The MSB of DMC1_MEM_CFG can be set to '1' for separate CKE control
for S3C6400. In the configuration of SMDK6400, however, two 16-bit
mDDR (SAMSUNG K4X51163) chips are used in parallel to form 32-bit
memory bus and there is no need to contorl CKE for each chip
separately. AFAIK, CKE1 is not at all
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear =?UTF-8?B?7J207Iq57ZiE?=,
>
> In message you
> wrote:
>
>> flash_sect_erase() displays message "Erased #N sectors" even when
>> there are some protected sectors found and command "erase" fail.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Seunghyeon Rhee
>> ---
>> com
r
LPM Technology Inc.
T +82-70-8255-6007 F +82-2-6442-6462
M +82-10-2790-0657
Minkyu Kang 쓴 글:
> Dear Seunghyeon Rhee,
>
> 2009/11/4 "Seunghyeon Rhee (이승현)" :
>
>> Move the definitions of DRAM parameters from SoC description
>> (s3c6400.h) to board descriptio
Move the definitions of DRAM parameters from SoC description
(s3c6400.h) to board description (smdk6400.h). DRAM parameters
are rather board-specific than SoC specific. According to the
current source, one may have to change the definitions in
s3c6400.h in addition to creating the new board descrip
This patch turns off MAC address mismatch warning when
optional eeprom programmed with MAC address is not available.
In that case, smc911x's MAC address register has its default
value ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff and it's not a valid address. This
makes eth_initialize() show the warning which has no
meani
Dear Minkyu Kang,
2009/11/2 Minkyu Kang :
> Dear Seunghyeon Rhee
>
> 2009/10/31 "Seunghyeon Rhee (이승현)" :
>> stack_setup is modified to initialize the stack on the correct address in
>> DRAM accroding to the typical memory configuration described in
>>
stack_setup is modified to initialize the stack on the correct address in
DRAM accroding to the typical memory configuration described in
README and the related CONFIG_* macro definitions. This makes macro
CONFIG_MEMORY_UPPER_CODE no longer necessry. This was introduced
and used only by this board
There were two patches submitted to add support for SMSC LAN9220 and
LAN9221.
The latter (more recent one) has been applied but the former hasn't yet.
Refer to the
following and check please.
Regards,
Seunghyeon Rhee
Thu Apr 23 07:36:25 CEST 2009
> Daniel Mack wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Mac
8 matches
Mail list logo