Re: [PATCH] [RFC] tools: fitmount: fuse mount fit images

2020-06-24 Thread selvamuthukumar v
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:47 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 06:01:38PM +0530, selvamuthukumar v wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:15 PM Selva Muthukumar > > wrote: > > > > > > Allow mounting of FIT images. If FIT images are used for firmwa

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] tools: fitmount: fuse mount fit images

2020-06-23 Thread selvamuthukumar v
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:15 PM Selva Muthukumar wrote: > > Allow mounting of FIT images. If FIT images are used for firmware upgrade > from linux, mouting can save space in comparison to using dumpimage. > Any comments on this? Is there any other way to get FIT image contents, without extractin

[U-Boot] Read a volume from a UBI image in RAM

2019-04-29 Thread selvamuthukumar v
Hi I've a UBI image having two volumes, kernel and rootfs. I can tftp the UBI image to RAM and then write to NAND. I want to validate the kernel (checksum and signature) before writing the UBI image to flash. Is there a command available to read a volume from a UBI image that is in RAM? Thanks. S

[U-Boot] [PATCH] [RFC] Make default environment available in fw_printenv

2009-02-28 Thread Selvamuthukumar
Include board configuration file in fw_printenv to get default environment variables. Signed-off-by: Selvamuthukumar --- I'm not sure whether this can be achived without any change in code, And howmany other things this change breaks, so marking it as RFC. tools/env/fw_env.c |4

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Align end of bss by 4 bytes

2008-11-01 Thread Selvamuthukumar
Wolfgang, > Most of the bss initialization loop increments 4 bytes > at a time. And the loop end is checked for an 'equal' > condition. Make the bss end address aligned by 4, so > that the loop will end as expected. Any update about this patch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Align end of bss by 4 bytes,

2008-10-27 Thread Selvamuthukumar
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:19 AM, Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Selvamuthukumar, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I wrote: >> >> > > Should we not perform this change globally, i. e. to *all* linker >> > > scripts? >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Align end of bss by 4 bytes.

2008-10-15 Thread Selvamuthukumar
tch: > Thanks for the review. I'll fix the errors and send v2 of this patch. -- Selvamuthukumar ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Align end of bss by 4 bytes,

2008-10-14 Thread Selvamuthukumar
expect a patch that touches all linker scripts, that does not do bss alignment? If so, I'll send it. -- Selvamuthukumar ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Fix the wrong comment.

2008-10-13 Thread Selvamuthukumar
--- cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c b/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c index 63aa8a4..697482c 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c +++ b/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c @@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ int checkcpu(void) * The 'dummy' variable is used to increment

[U-Boot] [PATCH] [Not for inclusion] Add support to verify UPM array

2008-10-08 Thread Selvamuthukumar
--- This function is not called anywhere within main tree. This is just for reference. Not to be included in main tree. cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c | 38 ++ 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c b/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c index 586

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Wait till UPM completes the write to array.

2008-10-08 Thread Selvamuthukumar
Reference manual states that MxMR[MAD] increment is the indication of write to UPM array is complete. Honour that. Also, make the dummy write explicit. Signed-off-by: Selvamuthukumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Ignore the previous patch. Sequence of doing things were wroing in that. cpu/m

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Wait till UPM completes the write to array.

2008-10-08 Thread Selvamuthukumar
Reference manual states that MxMR[MAD] increment is the indication of write to UPM array is complete. Honour that. Also, make the dummy write explicit. Signed-off-by: Selvamuthukumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Remove unwanted ';' at end of define.

2008-10-07 Thread Selvamuthukumar
Currently this is not creating any problem. But it will result in compilation error when used as below. printf("CFG_SDRAM_CFG2 - %08x\n", CFG_SDRAM_CFG2); Signed-off-by: Selvamuthukumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/configs/MPC8313ERDB.h |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Align end of bss by 4 bytes,

2008-10-06 Thread Selvamuthukumar
ned-off-by: Selvamuthukumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- cpu/mpc83xx/u-boot.lds |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/u-boot.lds b/cpu/mpc83xx/u-boot.lds index 99ad675..0d26937 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc83xx/u-boot.lds +++ b/cpu/mpc83xx/u-boot.lds @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ SE

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Align end of bss by 4 bytes,

2008-10-06 Thread Selvamuthukumar
bss initialization loop increments 4 bytes at a time. And the loop end is checked for an 'equal' condition. Make the bss end address aligned by 4, so that the loop will end as expected. --- cpu/mpc83xx/u-boot.lds |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/