Re: Status of the various RISC-V specification and policy

The following is the extension lifecycle. It includes the official names going forward for each phase. We are trying to resolve any confusion naming and numbering and are still in progress of this evolution: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1nQ5uFb39KA6gvUi5SReWfIQSiRN7hp6z7ZPfctE4mKk/edit?u

Re: Status of the various RISC-V specification and policy

Palmer, Thank you for your input. Our strong intention is to not change specs once frozen. I speak for the committees here and say that, in our opinion, declaring something frozen sets a very high bar for making any changes and is sufficient to allow code supporting an extension to be upstrea

Re: Status of the various RISC-V specification and policy

the words in this document : https://wiki.riscv.org/plugins/servlet/mobile?contentId=13098230#content/view/13098230 make it very clear when changes are allowed or not and likely or not. if you think the verbiage is somehow ambiguous please help us make it better. Mark sent from a mobi