Hi,
Here is a short announcement about a change in the U-boot ColdFire
custodian.
It is unfortunately that I have less time to take care of the ColdFire
custodianship for some time now, and I was looking for right candidate
to take over this ColdFire custodianship. Jason (Jin Zhengxiong) has
expe
Acked.
Best Regards,
TsiChung
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de]
On Behalf Of Wolfgang Wegner
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 12:21 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Wolfgang Wegner
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add missing PCS3 for MCF5
Acked.
Best Regards,
TsiChung
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de]
On Behalf Of Wolfgang Wegner
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 12:20 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Wolfgang Wegner
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add CONFIG_SYS_FEC_NO_SHAR
Wolfgang,
As long as you are not using only one FEC's mdio/mdc to communicate the
both PHY at address 1.
Best Regards,
TsiChung
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de]
On Behalf Of w.weg...@astro-kom.de
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1
Wilfried,
5235 does not have internal flash.
Alternative, you can use FlexBus-NAND, Or SPI-MMC.
Best Regards,
TsiChung
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de]
On Behalf Of Wilfried Busalski
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 6:11 AM
To
Philippe,
The error that you encountered only happen when using linux cross
compiler; however, if choosing uclinux cross compiler this will not be
an issue.
Anyway, is an acked for me so that both compiler can be used without
causing the problem.
Best Regards,
TsiChung
-Original Message---
Hi Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit
d3870bd2d832ea2048b7cb2bbb9d642585b137cf:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'next' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-net into next
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-coldfire.git next
TsiChung Liew (2):
Wolfgang,
Yes, I will do that for the next merging window. Ignore this patch.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
TsiChung
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de]
On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 4:59 PM
To: TsiChung Liew
C
Michal,
Looks good to me.
Best Regards,
TsiChung
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Matt,
What are the settings for SW1[5] and SW1[6]? Should be SW1[5]-on and
SW1[6]-off. After programmed the Intel flash from Atmel flash, did you
flip the switch boot from Intel flash (SW1[3]-off)? Is your network
100Tbase or 10Tbase?
If you able to perform the same task in Atmel boot, you should
: Matthew Lear [mailto:m...@bubblegen.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 7:59 AM
To: Liew Tsi Chung-R5AAHP; u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: mcf5445x watchdog support in U-Boot
Hi TsiChung et al,
I was wondering if there are plans to support and utilise the watchdog
in the mcf5445x devices within U
Ben,
You missed this:
Date: Jun 1
[U-Boot] [PATCH] Standardize the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP as a udelay(1)
loop counter
Best Regards,
TsiChung
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de]
On Behalf Of Ben Warren
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009
Hi Wolfgang,
Please pull this change for u-boot-coldfire/next into your next branch:
The following changes since commit
9f2b981c3b47a12f8e2691b68776c4fbe0fb1394:
Stefan Roese (1):
ppc4xx: Remove PCI async bootup message if PCI is not used
are available in the git repository at:
git:
Richard,
Agree.
Best Regards,
TsiChung
-Original Message-
From: Richard Retanubun [mailto:richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com]
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 7:52 AM
To: u-boot Mailing List
Cc: Liew Tsi Chung-R5AAHP
Subject: coldFire: net: Question about the use of MCFFEC_TOUT_LOOP
Hi TC,
I
; Liew Tsi Chung-R5AAHP
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Ping on Coldfire patch status
Dear Richard,
In message <49fb6965.2010...@ruggedcom.com> you wrote:
>
> Hi TC and John,
>
> sorry if I'm being neurotic :) any chance the patches in the original
thread be merged in on 2009.06 ?
&g
Message-
From: Richard Retanubun [mailto:richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 4:28 PM
To: u-boot Mailing List
Cc: Liew Tsi Chung-R5AAHP
Subject: Coldfire: Compiler warnings when building M5271EVB
Tsi-Chung:
Sorry for the delay. I've posted the M5271 patches to the ma
Scott,
I do have -i8 included. So, which one I should edit by hand? The
" }," or " . =".
Regards,
TsiChung
-Original Message-
From: Wood Scott-B07421
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 12:01 PM
To: Liew Tsi Chung-R5AAHP
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen; U-Boot; Rigb
Haavard,
> Looks good to me, except...
>> +static const struct stmicro_spi_flash_params
stmicro_spi_flash_table[] = {
>> +{
>> + .idcode1 = STM_ID_M25P16,
>> + .page_size = 256,
>> + .pages_per_sector = 256,
>> + .nr_sectors = 32,
>> + .name = "M25P16",
>> + },
>> +
Haavard,
>> - * Copyright 2008, Network Appliance Inc.
>> + * Network Appliance Inc.
> why do you do this?
It must be accidentally deleted which is not intended to, I will resend
it again.
Mail-archive:
> ...which means that you can make these operations cheaper by using
> shift and mask instead
19 matches
Mail list logo
