On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:27:30PM +1000, Graeme Russ wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:12:16PM +1000, Graeme Russ wrote:
> >> What does Linux do? i.e. if you boot Linux from coreboot, how does it
> >> o
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:12:16PM +1000, Graeme Russ wrote:
> >> > for two or three graphics chipsets. SeaBIOS can initialize any VGA
> >> > option ROM, but then you need SeaBIOS in the loop.
> >> > Option ROMs are ageold technology and stupid, but they are still
> >> > firmly entrenched in PC har
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:46:53AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Graeme Russ wrote:
> > >> Would be interesting to investigate implementing a stub in U-Boot to
> > >> initialise and use VGA option ROMs
> > >
> > > VGA option ROMs call BIOS functions. So, one needs a BIOS
> > > implementation (eg, Se
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:40:23AM +1000, Graeme Russ wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > VGA option ROMs call BIOS functions. So, one needs a BIOS
> > implementation (eg, SeaBIOS) or an emulator for them (eg, in
> > coreboot).
>
&g
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:11:41AM +1000, Graeme Russ wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > In message <4dc94cd4.2050...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> >> - coreboot payloads should be in ELF (linked to libpayload)
> >
> > Is this really necessary, assuming we have a self-co
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 09:44:00AM +1000, Graeme Russ wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > Graeme Russ wrote:
> >> - Do we care about legacy BIOS support (SeaBIOS) for now (I think
> >> not)?
> >
> > IMO it is not relevant to the integration of coreboot and U-Boot.
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:35:46PM +1000, Graeme Russ wrote:
> - I'm in the middle of re-writing the entire real-mode switch code and
> real-mode support in U-Boot. The new code allows you to write real-mode
> code in C - I even have the Linux real-mode printf ported :) This will make
> writing yo
7 matches
Mail list logo
