Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <4af33815.4030...@windriver.com> you wrote:
>
Signed-off-by: Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye
>>> What is this? Are you sure this patch is properly attributed? Was
>>> Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye really the first to submit this patch?
>>>
>
Tom wrote:
> What is your
> $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc -v
> ?
> Tom
>
This is a home made toolchain. With same options with gcc-4.3.4,
gcc-4.4.1, no build error.
armel-linux-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: armel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
Configured with:
/usr/src/walsimou/embtoolkit-0.1.0-rc5/build/tool
>
> Alternatively, I have seen some unofficial u-boot ports for s3c24x0 cpu's that
> do support u-boot booting from NAND flash but I don't have the source code
> for them.
>
Kevin,
I think this[1] is the code you are talking about. I just give it a try
and it works like a charm when booting fro
Kevin,
This email seems to contain twice the same patch.
Cheers,
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
fluke56512 wrote:
> mini2440 is not cheap for a student in my country.
> 2009-09-05
>
>
I just want to say sorry for this mistake
Cheers,
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
lp!!
>
> Note 3: Most ARM systems also define this:
> PLATFORM_RELFLAGS +=$(call cc-option,-mshort-load-bytes,$(call
> cc-option,-malignment-traps,))
> I guess this can be unified and moved to lib_arm/config.mk, too, but I
> would like to handle this in a separate, later patch. This makes
> testing (and bisecting) easier, and it is a non-critical problem.
>
>
Tested-by: Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
I tested your patch against 7dedefdf749ff02c1086f7ddb8cb83a77b00d030
(latest revision at the moment of writing of u-boot.git).
My toolchain is a home-made toolchain and contains gcc-4.4.1,
binutils-2.19.1, eglibc-2.10.1, kernel headers 2.6.30.4, configured to
generate binaries f
Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> When trying to build U-Boot under Buildroot and OpenEmbedded,
> I run into a problem:
>
> When linking u-boot the linker seems to use the div0 from
> the C compiler libgcc instead of the u-boot div0.
>
Yes i had the same problem with a home made toolchain (eglibc-2.10,
g
Hello list and Kevin,
What about all these patches, did they apply with head?
I have a s3c2440 based board and will be happy to test them.
Thanks
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
9 matches
Mail list logo