Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mpc83xx: Fix comments on map_flash_by_law1

2010/4/11 Wolfgang Denk : > Dear Gao Ya'nan, > > In message <1270944532-2050-1-git-send-email-abutter@gmail.com> you wrote: >> --- >>  cpu/mpc83xx/start.S |    4 ++-- >>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > When reposting patche

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mpc83xx: {acr, spcr, sccr}_mask take more left-shifted values

--- cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c | 36 ++-- 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c b/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c index 75b4522..f3b67ae 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c +++ b/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c @@ -65,16 +65,16 @@ void

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mpc83xx: Fix comments on map_flash_by_law1

--- cpu/mpc83xx/start.S |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S index 68bb620..d7b03a9 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S +++ b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ map_flash_by_law1: ori r4, r4, (CONFIG_SYS_F

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] {ACR,SPCR,SCCR}_XXX have left-shifted values

--- cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c | 36 ++-- 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c b/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c index 75b4522..f3b67ae 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c +++ b/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu_init.c @@ -65,16 +65,16 @@ void

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] Fix comments for map_flash_by_law1

--- cpu/mpc83xx/start.S |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S index 68bb620..d7b03a9 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S +++ b/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ map_flash_by_law1: ori r4, r4, (CONFIG_SYS_F

Re: [U-Boot] Is there any full story about how to take advantage FDT function ?

2009/9/10 Scott Wood : > Gao Ya'nan wrote: >> >> 2009/9/10 Scott Wood : >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 02:41:19PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm not up on 8xx, but it may not have been pulled forward into the >

Re: [U-Boot] Is there any full story about how to take advantage FDT function ?

is where linux/u-boot started using the FDT. > > 8xx is supported in arch/powerpc. Yes, I have add CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT and CONFIG_OF_BOARD_SETUP for the FDT support which is missing in U-Boot-v2009.08, and it works well, but I found none complete document on how to write a dts file and add s

Re: [U-Boot] Is there any full story about how to take advantage FDT function ?

Hi, Jerry. 2009/9/6 Jerry Van Baren : > Gao Ya'nan wrote: >> >> And how to configure the kernel to minimize the code modification ? >> >> I am porting U-Boot and Linux to a new board with a MPC875 processor >> and two serial chips,  and U-Boot runs well no

Re: [U-Boot] lib_generic/zlib.c breaks when DEBUG are defined

code and found that the DEBUG macro in zlib.c conflict with my global DEBUG macro, and the DEBUG of zlib.c in U-boot-v2009.06 is DEBUG_ZLIB. And I'm thinking whether it is right to add a global DEBUG macro in PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS. Thanks. 2009/9/2 Wolfgang Denk : > Dear "Gao Ya'na

[U-Boot] lib_generic/zlib.c breaks when DEBUG are defined

== 84 /* Diagnostic functions */ 85 #ifdef DEBUG 86 #include == And == 1992 #ifdef DEBUG 1993 1994 #ifndef verbose 1995 #define verbose 0 1996 #endif == ___ U-Boot mailing

[U-Boot] Is there any full story about how to take advantage FDT function ?

And how to configure the kernel to minimize the code modification ? I am porting U-Boot and Linux to a new board with a MPC875 processor and two serial chips, and U-Boot runs well now. I hear that the FDT function can tell the kernel devices information more flexibly and reduce the code modificat

Re: [U-Boot] Where can I find some material about Xenomai/SOLO's usage and limit?

Sorry, I forgot it. And thanks for your tips. 2009/8/18 Wolfgang Denk : > Dear "Gao Ya'nan", > > In message you > wrote: >>  And is there any successful stories about Xenomai/SOLO? > > This is the U-Bootmailing list - you are off topic here. > >

[U-Boot] Where can I find some material about Xenomai/SOLO's usage and limit?

And is there any successful stories about Xenomai/SOLO? Thanks ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] Where is the GPR30 register in PowerPC arch as GOT pointer of C code documented?

this usage or it is just GCC's flavor? 2009/8/12 Kumar Gala : > > On Aug 12, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Gao Ya'nan wrote: > >> I find nothing about this in (E)ABI specification(perhaps some old), >> so, where is it? > > You want the ABI that is available here: >

[U-Boot] Where is the GPR30 register in PowerPC arch as GOT pointer of C code documented?

I find nothing about this in (E)ABI specification(perhaps some old), so, where is it? Thanks. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] Where is the GPR30 register in PowerPC arch as GOT pointer of C code documented?

I find nothing about this in (E)ABI specification(perhaps some old), so, where is it? Thanks. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] Where is the GPR30 register in PowerPC arch as GOT pointer documented?

I find nothing about this in (E)ABI specification(perhaps some old), so, where is it? Thanks. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot