On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:31 PM Remi Pommarel wrote:
> I don't know if it worth being mentioned here, but there is also a
> reverse engineered effort on bl31 for gxl.
>
> Thus it should be possible to use a bl31 built from mainline branch of
> https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware.
(which is especially useful if you want to avoid requiring
32-bit x86 binaries in your build system).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake
Cc: Neil Armstrong
---
board/amlogic/p212/README.libretech-cc | 41 +++---
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> While looking at the old uboot from hardkernel, I'm curious about
> CONFIG_CLK_BUS_DMC_220_440, which is set by default. This appears to
> run the memory at a high speed, by writing certain registers in the
> Dynamic Memor
Hi Przemyslaw,
While looking at the old uboot from hardkernel, I'm curious about
CONFIG_CLK_BUS_DMC_220_440, which is set by default. This appears to
run the memory at a high speed, by writing certain registers in the
Dynamic Memory Controller (e.g. TIMINGROW), and clocking MPLL to
880MHz.
Your u
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Przemyslaw Marczak
wrote:
> So BL1, BL2 are running in iRAM(required small size), and u-boot is running
> from a RAM.
>
> The main reason for using existing BL1 and BL2 binaries is
> that bl1 and bl2 are just working proper.
Fair enough, I was just a bit worried/c
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> I'm getting some new errors though, and my initramfs fails to switch
> to real root, I'll get back to you with more details if this is
> something other than a problem this side.
Silly error this side. Now things are fine.
Hi,
Sorry for last blank mail.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Not sure if this would be expected even in that case, but it also
> reproduces with mem=256m passed as a kernel arg.
With v5 there are no more corruption errors, thanks!
I'm getting some new er
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Marek Szyprowski
> wrote:
>> Frankly right now I'm using the bl1, bl2 and secure firmware which came
>> on eMMC together with my Odroid (I've just replaced uboot with fastload
&
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
> Frankly right now I'm using the bl1, bl2 and secure firmware which came
> on eMMC together with my Odroid (I've just replaced uboot with fastload
> flasher). We will check if binaries differ from those linked by
> Przemyslaw.
They probabl
Hi,
Thanks a lot for working on getting ODROID support upstream in uboot.
I'm testing with v4 of your patches on uboot 2014.07 and ODROID-U2.
I'd like to understand the SPL/BL2 situation a bit better.
README.odroid says that we should use the blob from hardkernel.
However, as far as I can see, t
10 matches
Mail list logo
