Hi Simon.
> On Aug 3, 2020, at 11:01 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 at 12:54, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:43:59PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> I do see some progress with PowerPC migration but it seems to be very
>>>
> On Aug 1, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
>
> Dear Tom,
>
> In message <20200731185425.GK6965@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
>>
>> Which particular area are you worried about currently? I believe we've
>> had another good sized removal of PowerPC platforms and everything
>> that's le
On Jan 15, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> ….. so we will keep it all,
> and just throw out the offending boards.
Cool! :) I'll have to dig out some old boards and see if they still work.
Thanks.
-- Dan
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-
On Sep 15, 2012, at 4:40 PM, J.Hwan Kim wrote:
Is there limitation of the kernel size which u-boot loads?
No.
My kernel is very big, because I included the ramdisk into the kernel.
My kernel size is over 40MB.
When I load the kernel through u-boot, the prcedure hangs in the
boot step.
Th
On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> "You can please all the people some of the time and some of the people
> all of the time but you can't please all the people all of the time."
Yes, I'm sometimes pleased :-)
> My current thinking is to introduce something like .
Well
Hi Wolfgang.
On Dec 8, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> If you want to make this switchable at runtime, then we should
> probably use an environment setting.
I experimented with this, but could never determine the
best way to cover all behavior. Do we have a variable that
indicates "do
On Dec 8, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> Probably want to complain to the user if reg is invalid and not
> zero/missing.
I think you guys are making this too complicated.
There are many ways to pass stupid mistakes via
a device tree, don't get carried away trying to single
out this one
On Aug 10, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Hi Dan! I'm glad you're reading as you're one of the use-cases I was
> thinking about. :-)
Hi Grant. Yeah, it's me, the "special" case :-)
> ... but I
> gather from your comment that even that causes problems in your
> use-case.
The /ch
On Aug 10, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> . At the
> moment, I think firmware should be restricted to only touching the
> /chosen node, the /memory node,
I don't even want it updating these, except maybe for the processor
clock speeds.
I'm trying to use device trees as a mechanis
On Oct 15, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Selvamuthukumar wrote:
> Most of the bss initialization loop increments 4 bytes
> at a time. And the loop end is checked for an 'equal'
> condition. Make the bss end address aligned by 4, so
> that the loop will end as expected.
IMHO, this is a bad programming practi
On Aug 15, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Does anyone have suggestions/comments? Any chance this feature
> could make
> it into mainline U-Boot?
Are going to take on the challenge of making this work with
processors that use CPM/QE devices for serial ports? :-)
Thanks.
-- Da
11 matches
Mail list logo
