Hi.
I'm trying the new UEFI-app mode where I rely on EFI services to give me
access to things like block devices etc. I'm currently using
2022.04-rc1. So far so good. I can start U-boot and the efi block device
works just fine.
But I'm not succeeding in booting a regular bzImage.
This kernel (5.1
: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Christian Melki
> ---
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Add new patch to set the correct link flags for the 64-bit EFI app
>
> arch/x86/config.mk | 15 ---
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/co
On 12/4/21 16:56, Simon Glass wrote:
> That script is not intended for use with EFI, so update the logic to avoid
> using it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Christian Melki
> ---
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Add new patch to avoid using the 64-bit lin
On 8/13/21 2:36 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 8/12/21 11:49 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
+Heinrich Schuchardt too
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 08:35, Christian Melki
wrote:
I was hoping that U-boot would detect BLOCK_IO devices provided by UEFI
automatically. But I can't see anything att
I was hoping that U-boot would detect BLOCK_IO devices provided by UEFI
automatically. But I can't see anything attached under lsblk or find
some other information about this.
For example, Barebox works just fine on both Virtualbox and real
hardware in this regard.
Barebox does not have an emm
Simon. Sorry for the late reply.
Tested on Virtualbox and on real hardware (DFI GHF51).
Works for me.
On 7/11/21 5:15 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> This is a revert of a recent logic change in setup_zimage(). We do
> actually need to install this information always. Change it to install
> from the Core
On 6/11/21 3:40 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> +Heinrich Schuchardt
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2021 at 07:30, Christian Melki
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have been trying to boot a bzImage with zboot from a VirtualBox UEFI
>> instance ->
On 6/9/21 8:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 11:20:47AM +0200, Christian Melki wrote:
>
>> A newer toolchain will emit udivmoddi4 for certain divide + modulo
>> operations instead of a separate divide and modulo operation.
>> AFAIU, this would be suffici
Signed-off-by: Christian Melki
---
disk/part_dos.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/disk/part_dos.c b/disk/part_dos.c
index 60addc6e00..9e29aa6583 100644
--- a/disk/part_dos.c
+++ b/disk/part_dos.c
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ int write_mbr_partitions(struct blk_desc
A newer toolchain will emit udivmoddi4 for certain divide + modulo
operations instead of a separate divide and modulo operation.
AFAIU, this would be sufficient.
Signed-off-by: Christian Melki
---
arch/x86/lib/div64.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/div64.c
10 matches
Mail list logo