Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx:fix pcie configuration space read/write

hi , Sergei 2011/1/16 Sergei Shtylyov : > Hello. > > On 15-01-2011 14:22, Baidu Boy wrote: > >> This patch fix a problem for the pcie enumeration when the mpc83xx pcie >> controller is >> connected with switch or we use both of the two pcie controller.

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] mpc83xx:fix pcie configuration space read/write

This patch fix a problem for the pcie enumeration when the mpc83xx pcie controller is connected with switch or we use both of the two pcie controller. Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- Changes for V2: - code refine arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c | 20 +++- include

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] bugfix: image header pointer change.

Hi, maintainers: 2010/11/28 Baidu Boy : > This patch is to avoid potential issue when we still use the pointer > images->legacy_hdr_os after the kernel un-compressed. > > in function boot_get_kernel(): > we should let the images->legacy_hdr_os point to the new copied im

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] mpc83xx: fix pcie configuration space read/write

Hi,Scott 2011/1/12 Scott Wood : > On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 19:51:41 +0800 > Baidu Boy wrote: > >> Hi, Scott >> >> 2011/1/11 Scott Wood : >> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:42:28 +0800 >> > Baidu Boy wrote: >> > >> >> This patch fix a proble

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx:fix pcie configuration space read/write

This patch fix a problem for the pcie enumeration when the mpc83xx pcie controller is connected with switch or we use both of the two pcie controller. Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c | 19 ++- include/pci.h |2 ++ 2 files

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc8378emds: correct the CS0 setting

The original CS0 OR configuration sets the reserved field. This patch is to correct the setting. Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- include/configs/MPC837XEMDS.h |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/MPC837XEMDS.h b/include/configs/MPC837XEMDS.h

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3] mpc83xx: fix pcie configuration space read/write

Hi, Scott 2011/1/11 Scott Wood : > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:42:28 +0800 > Baidu Boy wrote: > >> This patch fix a problem for the pcie enumeration when the mpc83xx pcie >> controller is >> connected with switch or we use both of the two pcie controller >

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3] mpc83xx: fix pcie configuration space read/write

This patch fix a problem for the pcie enumeration when the mpc83xx pcie controller is connected with switch or we use both of the two pcie controller Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- Changes for V2: - Avoid line wrap in the patch Changes for V3 - Add space between ) and { arch

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3] mpc83xx: fix pcie configuration space read/write

This patch fix a problem for the pcie enumeration when the mpc83xx pcie controller is connected with switch or we use both of the two pcie controller Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- Changes for V2: - Avoid line wrap in the patch Changes for V3 - Add space between ) and { arch

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] mpc83xx: fix pcie configuration space read/write

This patch fix a problem for the pcie enumeration when the mpc83xx pcie controller is connected with switch or we use both of the two pcie controller. Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- Changes for v2: - Avoid line wrap in the patch arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c |8 ++-- 1 files

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: fix pcie configuration space read/write

This patch fix a problem for the pcie enumeration when the mpc83xx pcie controller is connected with switch or we use both of the two pcie controller. Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a

Re: [U-Boot] powerpc unlock cache difference between e300 and e500

2011/1/6 YiChao Ma : > hi: >  My question is why e500 unlock_ram_in_cache in board.c ,and e300 > unlock_ram_in_cache in bootm.c? > > I also find this weeks ago.Maybe we can conmbine them. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] mpc83xx:pcie:bugfix for mpc83xx pcie enumeration

2010/11/28 Kim Phillips : > doesn't apply: > > Applying: mpc83xx:pcie:bugfix for mpc83xx pcie enumeration > fatal: corrupt patch at line 13 > > please resubmit. > > Thanks, > > Kim > > Please use this one http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/73424/ My mailer wrap the long line in the V2 patch. Than

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4] mpc83xx:pcie:bugfix for mpc83xx pcie enumeration

ion mpc83xx_pcie_register_hose(). Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- Changes for v2: - Add some description for the patch Changes for V3: - Avoid line wrap in the patch Changes for V4: - There are some errors in V3, resubmit the patch --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c | 12 ++-- 1 files changed

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3] mpc83xx:pcie:bugfix for mpc83xx pcie enumeration

ion mpc83xx_pcie_register_hose(). Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- Changes for v2:      - Add some description for the patch Changes for V3: - Avoid line wrap in the patch arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c |   12 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3] bugfix: image header pointer change.

ritten in the kernel un-compressed process. This is a potential problem. Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- changes for V2: - Avoid unrelated syntax changes changes for V3: - Add some description for this patch. common/cmd_bootm.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff -

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] mpc83xx:pcie:bugfix for mpc83xx pcie enumeration

ion mpc83xx_pcie_register_hose(). Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- Changes for v2: - Add some description for the patch. arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c | 12 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c index 1771

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] bugfix: image header pointer change.

Hi,Walfgang: 2010/11/27 Wolfgang Denk : > Dear Baidu Boy, > > Comments like the "changes for V2" gor _below_ the "---" ine, not > above. > > And you still don't mention anything abut the problem you are fixing > in the commit message. > we should

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] bugfix: image header pointer change.

Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy changes for V2: - avoid unrelated syntax changes --- common/cmd_bootm.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/cmd_bootm.c b/common/cmd_bootm.c index 1a024f1..8f9e5f1 100644 --- a/common/cmd_bootm.c +++ b/common/cmd_bootm.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: pcie.c enumeration for mpc83xx/pcie.c

Dear Wolfgang: 2010/11/27 Wolfgang Denk : > Would you please explain what this paych is trying to do? Are you > fixing a bug (if so, how does it manifest and hoiw can we test that > your patch really fixes the bug), or are you adding a new feature? > (which one?) > > On which board(s) has this pat

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: pcie.c enumeration for mpc83xx/pcie.c

Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c | 12 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c index 1771c48..46a706d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/pcie.c +++ b/arch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] bugfix: image header pointer change.

I get your point. So I need to re-send a patch? 2010/11/27 Mike Frysinger : > On Friday, November 26, 2010 20:08:07 Baidu Boy wrote: >> Hi,Mike: > > please do not top post > >> the purpose of below code is to copy the image header to the static > > please read t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] bugfix: image header pointer change.

10/11/27 Mike Frysinger : > On Friday, November 26, 2010 18:59:42 Baidu Boy wrote: >> -             show_boot_progress (6); >> +             show_boot_progress (6); > > this doesnt seem to actually be changing anything.  you should avoid unrelated > syntax cha

[U-Boot] [PATCH] bugfix: image header pointer change.

images.legacy_hdr_os should point to the new copied structure, not the original structure which may be over written. Signed-off-by: Baidu Boy --- common/cmd_bootm.c |5 ++--- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/cmd_bootm.c b/common/cmd_bootm.c index 1a024f1

[U-Boot] the d-cache is not unlocked

Dear buddies: For the e300 core, we can see the d-cache is locked as SRAM for the stack in start.S file by calling the function lock_ram_in_cache: --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_LOCK bl lock_ram_in_cache sync #endif --- But we