Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Origen: Set FIMD as the default display path

On 08/06/2013 08:29 AM, Minkyu Kang wrote: > Dear Tushar Behera, > > On 07/06/13 19:56, Tushar Behera wrote: >> On EXYNOS4210, there are three paths for display data to be processed, >> namely MIE, MDNIE and FIMD. On Origen board, FIMD display controller >> is used. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tushar Beh

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] arm: goni: remove config.mk file

Dear Lukasz Majewski, On 26/07/13 15:59, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:45:09 +0900 Minkyu Kang mk7.k...@samsung.com > wrote, > > Hi Minkyu, > >> Dear Lukasz, >> >> On 25/07/13 20:05, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:45:35 +0900 Minkyu Kang mk7.k...@samsung.com

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Origen: Set FIMD as the default display path

Dear Tushar Behera, On 07/06/13 19:56, Tushar Behera wrote: > On EXYNOS4210, there are three paths for display data to be processed, > namely MIE, MDNIE and FIMD. On Origen board, FIMD display controller > is used. > > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera > --- > This patch is rebased on master branch o

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/9] tegra: i2c: Enable new CONFIG_SYS_I2C framework

On 08/05/2013 02:08 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 01:21:50PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 07/30/2013 02:00 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: ... (discussion of >> instantiating/initializing I2C devices from device tree, and the >> fact U-Boot attempts to do that before .data or malloc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] wandboard: add pxe support, set default boot command like highbank

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Rob Herring, > > In message > you > wrote: >> >> > Maybe can be mkenvimage a solution (tools/mkenvimage) ? It creates an >> > environment image from a simple ASCII text. The resulting image could be >> > concatenated together with u-b

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On 08/05/2013 03:08 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:43:39 +0200 > Wolfgang Denk wrote: > >> Dear Dennis, >> >> In message <20130805145059.14c35...@adria.ausil.us> you wrote: >>> >>> right, but at the least it needs to be ext4 not all boards today >>> read ext4

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

Hi Wolfgang, On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:43:39 +0200 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Dennis, > > In message <20130805145059.14c35...@adria.ausil.us> you wrote: > > > > right, but at the least it needs to be ext4 not all boards today > > read ext4, btrfs may be something down the road also. u-boot doesnt

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:09:55PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/05/2013 03:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:49:58PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 08/05/2013 02:43 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: ... > >>> Please look into Tom's proposal to got the SPL / Falcon mode > >>

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On 08/05/2013 03:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:49:58PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 08/05/2013 02:43 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: ... >>> Please look into Tom's proposal to got the SPL / Falcon mode >>> way. I fully agre with him there. >> >> From my reading of doc/README.f

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/9] tegra: i2c: Enable new CONFIG_SYS_I2C framework

On 08/05/2013 02:08 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 01:21:50PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 07/30/2013 02:00 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: ... (discussion of >> instantiating/initializing I2C devices from device tree, and the >> fact U-Boot attempts to do that before .data or malloc

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:54:03PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:25:45 -0400 > Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:11:20PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:01:32 -0400 > > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 02:11:0

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:49:58PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/05/2013 02:43 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > ... > > Please look into Tom's proposal to got the SPL / Falcon mode way. I > > fully agre with him there. > > From my reading of doc/README.falcon, in order to use it, you still must >

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On 08/05/2013 02:26 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 12:48:25 -0600 > Stephen Warren wrote: > >> On 08/05/2013 12:39 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> ... >>> Note that I'm also in the process of pushing a project to github >>> that creates a few boot.scr that fit into this model. I've

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:25:45 -0400 Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:11:20PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:01:32 -0400 > > Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 02:11:04AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > [snip] > > > > bootz and raw initrd support.

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On 08/05/2013 02:43 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: ... > Please look into Tom's proposal to got the SPL / Falcon mode way. I > fully agre with him there. >From my reading of doc/README.falcon, in order to use it, you still must set everything up in order to do a full non-falcon boot, and then simply sav

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On 08/05/2013 02:11 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:01:32 -0400 > Tom Rini wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 02:11:04AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I wanted to start a discussion on defining a unified feature set >>> that makes it simpler for the differ

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] wandboard: add pxe support, set default boot command like highbank

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:36:09PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom, > > In message <20130805190949.GS5164@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > > Simon's proposal for text version of default environment is a move to > > > the right direction, it seems, as will easy reuse of environment > > > a

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

Dear Dennis, In message <20130805145059.14c35...@adria.ausil.us> you wrote: > > right, but at the least it needs to be ext4 not all boards today read > ext4, btrfs may be something down the road also. u-boot doesnt need to > care too much. it just needs to look in / and /boot Where exactly do yo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] wandboard: add pxe support, set default boot command like highbank

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:28:15PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom, > > In message <20130805160747.GP5164@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > > U-Boot is perfectly able to import such settings from text files (or > > > text blobs stored somewhere, even attached to the U-Boot image, if you > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] wandboard: add pxe support, set default boot command like highbank

Dear Tom, In message <20130805190949.GS5164@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > Simon's proposal for text version of default environment is a move to > > the right direction, it seems, as will easy reuse of environment > > among boards. > > I need to look at this again, I think the biggest problem /

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] wandboard: add pxe support, set default boot command like highbank

Dear Tom, In message <20130805160747.GP5164@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > U-Boot is perfectly able to import such settings from text files (or > > text blobs stored somewhere, even attached to the U-Boot image, if you > > want), so just use the text files separately, instead of hard > > compilin

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 12:48:25 -0600 Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/05/2013 12:39 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > ... > > Note that I'm also in the process of pushing a project to github > > that creates a few boot.scr that fit into this model. I've written > > the code, and hope to have IP approval to

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 03:11:20PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:01:32 -0400 > Tom Rini wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 02:11:04AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: [snip] > > > bootz and raw initrd support. not having to wrap kernels and initrds > > > really is a must. raw

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On 08/05/2013 01:50 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 12:39:03 -0600 Stephen Warren > wrote: >> On 08/03/2013 01:11 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>> I wanted to start a discussion on defining a unified feature set >>> that makes it simpler for the different distros to support ARM >>> s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/9] tegra: i2c: Enable new CONFIG_SYS_I2C framework

On 08/05/2013 02:12 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Stephen Warren > wrote: > > On 08/05/2013 09:40 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > ... > > Yes I think we should fix the problem properly rather than just > revert

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 01/20] Add functions for use with i.mx6 otg udc

On 8/4/2013 1:15 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Troy Kisky, In message <1375399657-25642-2-git-send-email-troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com> you wrote: Add functions for use with mx6 soc void otg_enable(void); void reset_usb_phy1(void); Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/soc

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 02:50:59PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 12:39:03 -0600 > Stephen Warren wrote: > > > On 08/03/2013 01:11 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: [snip] > > > when it comes to memory addressing a distro and user shouldn't need > > > to know anything. Ideally u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/9] tegra: i2c: Enable new CONFIG_SYS_I2C framework

Hi Stephen, On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/05/2013 09:40 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > ... > > Yes I think we should fix the problem properly rather than just revert. > > I will take a look. > > How long will fixing it properly take? > I expect to have a patch tomorro

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:01:32 -0400 Tom Rini wrote: > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 02:11:04AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I wanted to start a discussion on defining a unified feature set > > that makes it simpler for the different distros to support ARM > > systems using u-boot.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/9] tegra: i2c: Enable new CONFIG_SYS_I2C framework

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 01:21:50PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 07/30/2013 02:00 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > ... > (discussion of instantiating/initializing I2C devices from device tree, > and the fact U-Boot attempts to do that before .data or malloc can be > touched/used, which doesn't work)

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 12:39:03 -0600 Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/03/2013 01:11 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I wanted to start a discussion on defining a unified feature set > > that makes it simpler for the different distros to support ARM > > systems using u-boot. I have based

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/9] tegra: i2c: Enable new CONFIG_SYS_I2C framework

On 07/30/2013 02:00 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: ... (discussion of instantiating/initializing I2C devices from device tree, and the fact U-Boot attempts to do that before .data or malloc can be touched/used, which doesn't work) ... > It seems like much of U-Boot's initialization architecture simply w

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] wandboard: add pxe support, set default boot command like highbank

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 01:29:20PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >> Well, OE and Yocto allow to build fine-tuned target environments; they > >> really don't have any new requirements as "standard" distros like > >> Fedroa do. > > > > Yeah, and i

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 02:11:04AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to start a discussion on defining a unified feature set that > makes it simpler for the different distros to support ARM systems using > u-boot. I have based a lot of my thoughts on how calxeda ship their > sys

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On 08/05/2013 12:39 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: ... > Note that I'm also in the process of pushing a project to github that > creates a few boot.scr that fit into this model. I've written the code, > and hope to have IP approval to upload it very soon. Aside from the > example above, it also supports

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On 08/03/2013 01:11 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to start a discussion on defining a unified feature set that > makes it simpler for the different distros to support ARM systems using > u-boot. I have based a lot of my thoughts on how calxeda ship their > systems configured as

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/9] tegra: i2c: Enable new CONFIG_SYS_I2C framework

On 08/02/2013 09:55 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Stephen, > > Am 02.08.2013 23:43, schrieb Stephen Warren: >> On 08/01/2013 10:40 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>> Am 01.08.2013 22:32, schrieb Stephen Warren: >> ... Given how long this discussion is going on, can we please just revert t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/9] tegra: i2c: Enable new CONFIG_SYS_I2C framework

On 08/05/2013 09:40 AM, Simon Glass wrote: ... > Yes I think we should fix the problem properly rather than just revert. > I will take a look. How long will fixing it properly take? I've already received at least a couple reports from people outside NVIDIA and a couple from people inside NVIDIA w

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] nds32: fix the missing COBJS-y change

There is a missing in previous commit 951344b778d6ac67b94011d942a5a55da7202027 (nds32: Convert Makefiles to use COBJS-y style) will cause compile error. Signed-off-by: Kuan-Yu Kuo Cc: Macpaul Lin Cc: Andes --- board/AndesTech/adp-ag102/Makefile |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 dele

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] nds32: introduce DMA allocation API

U-Boot does not compile for the adp-ag101 boards since commit a8f9cd1893bef05b92f63242228607b45821c4a7 (net: update FTGMAC100 for MMU/D-cache support) The driver assumes that the DMA allocation API are provided by all architectures. This is not the case for nds32 and it causes a build error. This

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] wandboard: add pxe support, set default boot command like highbank

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> Well, OE and Yocto allow to build fine-tuned target environments; they >> really don't have any new requirements as "standard" distros like >> Fedroa do. > > Yeah, and it's also true that less per machine hacking you have to do > with each new bo

Re: [U-Boot] Unified u-boot feature set for simpler distro support

On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 11:08:57AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 3 August 2013 08:11, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > when it comes to memory addressing a distro and user shouldn't need to > > know anything. Ideally u-boot will auto allocate addresses based on the > > size of loaded objects. starting

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] wandboard: add pxe support, set default boot command like highbank

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 07:29:33AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Rob Herring, > > In message > you > wrote: > > > > > Maybe can be mkenvimage a solution (tools/mkenvimage) ? It creates an > > > environment image from a simple ASCII text. The resulting image could be > > > concatenated toge

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/10] am33xx: Move V_OSCK/V_SCLK to

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:40:29AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 05:26:56PM +0200, Lars Poeschel wrote: > > Am Montag, 5. August 2013, 17:17:32 schrieb Tom Rini: > > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 06:41:32AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote: > > > > Hello Tom, > > > > > > > > Am 02.08.201

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/9] tegra: i2c: Enable new CONFIG_SYS_I2C framework

Hi, On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Stephen, > > Am 02.08.2013 23:43, schrieb Stephen Warren: > > On 08/01/2013 10:40 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >> >>> Am 01.08.2013 22:32, schrieb Stephen Warren: >>> >> ... >> >>> Given how long this discussion is going on, can we

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/10] am33xx: Move V_OSCK/V_SCLK to

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 05:26:56PM +0200, Lars Poeschel wrote: > Am Montag, 5. August 2013, 17:17:32 schrieb Tom Rini: > > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 06:41:32AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote: > > > Hello Tom, > > > > > > Am 02.08.2013 22:26, schrieb Tom Rini: > > > >This detail belongs in the arch head

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/10] Introduce common config file for TI ARMv7 platforms

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/03/2013 12:51 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Tom, > > Am 02.08.2013 22:26, schrieb Tom Rini: >> Hey all, >> >> The following series cleans up am335x a bit, and then uses that >> to introduce a common config file that can be used on all of th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/10] am33xx: Move V_OSCK/V_SCLK to

Am Montag, 5. August 2013, 17:17:32 schrieb Tom Rini: > On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 06:41:32AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote: > > Hello Tom, > > > > Am 02.08.2013 22:26, schrieb Tom Rini: > > >This detail belongs in the arch header file, given how we are > > >structured today at least. > > > > > >Signed

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] wandboard: add pxe support, set default boot command like highbank

On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 12:11:47AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom, > > In message <20130804214743.GJ5164@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > > I am not that pessimistic. The tools are all available and in place. > > > "env import" (and other capabilities of the "env" command) allow to > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/10] am33xx: Move V_OSCK/V_SCLK to

On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 06:41:32AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Tom, > > Am 02.08.2013 22:26, schrieb Tom Rini: > >This detail belongs in the arch header file, given how we are structured > >today at least. > > > >Signed-off-by: Tom Rini > >--- > > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-am33xx/clocks_

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC V2 0/9] Refactor MAINTAINERS file

On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 04:24:08PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 23:37:06 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD > wrote: > > > This patch series aims at merging MAINTAINERS and boards.cfg into > > a single, easily processable file. > > > > There are not actually niine changes as such; they

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] arm, da850: add ipam390 board support

add the am1808 based ipam390 board from Barix. - 128MByte, DDR2, synchronous RAM 16bit databus to SDRAM interface - 128MByte, NAND Flash, 8bit databus to the NANDFlash Interface - Ethernet PHY Micrel KSZ8051R via RMII - Console on UART 0 - booting fron nand flash - spl falcon bootmode Signed-

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] arm/davinci/da850: add uart0_pins_rtscts and RMII_MHz_50_CLK in emac_pins_rmii pinmux

Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher Cc: Tom Rini --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/da850_pinmux.c | 6 ++ arch/arm/include/asm/arch-davinci/pinmux_defs.h | 3 ++- 2 Dateien geändert, 8 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 1 Zeile entfernt(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/da850_pinmux.c b/arch

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] bootstage: get more BOOTSTAGE_ID* in show_boot_progress()

In case CONFIG_BOOTSTAGE is not defined, call from bootstage_mark_name() show_boot_progress(), so get more BOOTSTAGE_ID* ids in show_boot_progress() if CONFIG_BOOTSTAGE is not defined. Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher Cc: Simon Glass Cc: Tom Rini Cc: Albert Aribaud --- include/bootstage.h | 1 +

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] arm, da850: add ipam390 board support

add the am1808 based ipam390 board from Barix. - 128MByte, DDR2, synchronous RAM 16bit databus to SDRAM interface - 128MByte, NAND Flash, 8bit databus to the NANDFlash Interface - Ethernet PHY Micrel KSZ8051R via RMII - Console on UART 0 - booting fron nand flash - spl falcon bootmode Needed

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] arm, da850: enable the correct uart in arch_cpu_init()

in arch_cpu_init() uart2 is fix enabled, without reference the setting from CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_COM1. Use the setting from CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_COM1 for enabling the console. Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher Cc: Albert ARIBAUD Cc: Tom Rini Cc: Christian Riesch --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/da8

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2]powerpc/fdt: Modify USB device-tree fixup for erratum-A006918

Erratum-A006918 prevents internal UTMI phy pll from starting sometimes. Workaround involves restarting phy pll maximum seven times with 1ms delay in each loop. If pll still fails to start after max retries, "status" property is set to "fail-erratum-a006918" to stop kernel from using this device Si

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2]powerpc/usb: Workaround for erratum-A006918

Erratum-A006918 prevents internal UTMI dual phy pll inside T4240 rev 1.0 from starting sometimes. Workaround involves restarting phy pll maximum seven times with 1ms delay in each loop Signed-off-by: Ramneek Mehresh Signed-off-by: Suresh Gupta --- Applies on git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git (branch

[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/usb: Depricate usb_phy_type and usb_dr_mode uboot env variables

Remove getting values of usb mode and phy_type from "usb_dr_mode" and "usb_phy_type" uboot env variables. Now, these are determined only from hwconfig string Signed-off-by: Ramneek Mehresh --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xxx/fdt.c | 22 -- 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH]fsl/usb: Move USB internal phy definitions to fsl_usb.h

fsl_usb.h file created to share data bewteen usb platform code and usb ip driver. Internal phy structure definitions moved to this file Signed-off-by: Ramneek Mehresh --- Applies on git://git.denx.de/u-boot.git (branch master) arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c | 7 +-- arch/powerpc/include

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, RFC] ext4fs: le32_to_cpu() used on a 16-bit field

Hi! > U-Boot 2013.07-rc3 [ELDK 5.2.1 / ELDK 5.3] > > Now I've started to use the new ext4 code. I need the "ext4write" command. > Though there seems to be several problems with the ext2/ext4 code. > > I am testing on an ml507 (PPC440, Big Endian). > There are some cases where the a field is 16-b