Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] usb/ehci: Add USB support for the MX6Q

2012-02-10 Thread Marek Vasut
> > Currently, only USB Host 1 is supported. > > Hi, > > this resembles mx28 USBH ... or am I wrong? Can't these be coalesced > together? > > btw Fabio, do we support mx6q USB host in mainline Linux ? To make this even creepier ... the mx6q GPMI NAND interface is also taken from mx28. So basi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] usb/ehci: Add USB support for the MX6Q

2012-02-10 Thread Marek Vasut
> Currently, only USB Host 1 is supported. Hi, this resembles mx28 USBH ... or am I wrong? Can't these be coalesced together? btw Fabio, do we support mx6q USB host in mainline Linux ? > > Cc: Remy Bohmer > Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger > --- > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/clock.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] EXYNOS: SMDK5250: Support all 4 UARTs

2012-02-10 Thread Marek Vasut
> This properly configures the mux to enable the right UART depending on > the setting of CONFIG_SERIALX. > > This also fixes things so that we don't configure balls XUCTSN_1 and > XURTSN_1 as UART1 configuration (RTS/CTS), since they aren't > connected. > > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson > --- >

Re: [U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

2012-02-10 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Mike, On 02/11/2012 07:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > waving your hands around and saying "doing XXX is more secure and therefore > we > should do it" is theater. i'm not against passwords or ASLR or anything else Agreed - I've already said as much in the ASLR thread > in u-boot, but lik

Re: [U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

2012-02-10 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Frans, In message you wrote: > > > If you want security, then don;t allow access to U-Boot at all, and > > run an OS. There you can do fancy things, including password > > protection. > > The issue is mainly that we would like a service engineer to upgrade > if for some reason the os goes

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] EXYNOS: SMDK5250: Add support for DDR3 memory.

2012-02-10 Thread Doug Anderson
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Hatim Ali wrote: > SMDK5250 development boards have different memory variants like > DDR3, LPDDR2 and LPDDR3. This patch adds supports for DDR3. > The DDR3 is configured for 667Mhz and is being enabled by default. One other note: the SDRAM doesn't appear to be stab

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/master

2012-02-10 Thread Tom Rini
Hello, The following changes since commit ca849aa4b86b282f837c58a0b129460ebfad2239: David Müller (ELSOFT AG) (1): ARM: activate DISPLAY_CPUINFO for VCMA9 + SMDK2410 board are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ti.git master Aneesh V (1): OMAP4460: Red

[U-Boot] [PATCH] EXYNOS: SMDK5250: Support all 4 UARTs

2012-02-10 Thread Doug Anderson
This properly configures the mux to enable the right UART depending on the setting of CONFIG_SERIALX. This also fixes things so that we don't configure balls XUCTSN_1 and XURTSN_1 as UART1 configuration (RTS/CTS), since they aren't connected. Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson --- board/samsung/smdk5

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/28] net: Make the MAC-seeded random number generator available to /net

2012-02-10 Thread Joe Hershberger
Hi Mike, On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 19 January 2012 19:53:07 Joe Hershberger wrote: >> --- a/net/bootp.c >> +++ b/net/bootp.c >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_BOOTP_RANDOM_DELAY >> +#include "net_rand.h" >> +#endif > > let's push this CONFIG_xxx check into net_rand.h

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] da850evm: add support to read mac address from SPI flash

2012-02-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 10 February 2012 01:22:24 Manjunath Hadli wrote: > --- a/board/davinci/da8xxevm/da850evm.c > +++ b/board/davinci/da8xxevm/da850evm.c > > +#define CFG_MAC_ADDR_SPI_BUS 0 > +#define CFG_MAC_ADDR_SPI_CS 0 > +#define CFG_MAC_ADDR_SPI_MAX_HZ CONFIG_SF_DEFAULT_SPEED > +#define CFG_MAC_AD

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] RFC: Let linker create phy array

2012-02-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 10 February 2012 15:57:50 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 10/02/2012 21:32, Mike Frysinger a écrit : > > On Friday 10 February 2012 14:39:12 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >> Le 07/02/2012 16:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit : > >>> On Monday 06 February 2012 16:01:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 06/02/

Re: [U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

2012-02-10 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
2012/2/10 Wolfgang Denk : > Dear Frans Meulenbroeks, > > In message > you > wrote: >> Generally speaking there is a use case for a password. > > Of course there is.  The question is if the oot loader is the right > place for it. > >> E.g. if you deliver boards/systems with u-boot on it and you d

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 5/5] i.mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Update the network configuration

2012-02-10 Thread Troy Kisky
On 2/7/2012 5:08 PM, Troy Kisky wrote: Define CONFIG_PHY_MICREL, and minimize the tx clock delay. There is an issue with 1000 baseTx mode on early revs of the SabreLite boards. The center tap pin 9 of the mag RJ45 USB combo was connected to the 3.3 filtered supply. Letting this pin float solved

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] RFC: Let linker create phy array

2012-02-10 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 10/02/2012 21:32, Mike Frysinger a écrit : On Friday 10 February 2012 14:39:12 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Le 07/02/2012 16:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit : On Monday 06 February 2012 16:01:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Le 06/02/2012 21:57, Mike Frysinger a écrit : Is there a keep attribute like the link

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/17] arm: Add control over cachability of memory regions

2012-02-10 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Simon, Le 15/01/2012 01:47, Simon Glass a écrit : Add support for adjusting the cachability of an L1 section by updating the MMU. The mmu_set_region_dcache() function allows drivers to make these changes after the MMU is set up. It is implemented only for ARMv7 at present. This is needed fo

Re: [U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

2012-02-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 10 February 2012 15:29:05 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 10 February 2012 09:12:10 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > > E.g. if you deliver boards/systems with u-boot on it and you do not > > want customers to enter u-boot (e.g. by accident or because they want > > to hack the board), but you

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 22/28] net: Fix net buffer initialization

2012-02-10 Thread Joe Hershberger
Hi Mike, On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 19 January 2012 19:53:25 Joe Hershberger wrote: >> @@ -627,6 +639,12 @@ NetSendUDPPacket >> >> +     /* make sure the NetTxPacket is initialized (NetInit() was called) */ >> +     if (NetTxPacket == NULL) { >> +        

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] RFC: Let linker create phy array

2012-02-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 10 February 2012 14:39:12 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 07/02/2012 16:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit : > > On Monday 06 February 2012 16:01:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > >> Le 06/02/2012 21:57, Mike Frysinger a écrit : > Is there a keep attribute like the linker has for sections? > >>> > >>>

Re: [U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

2012-02-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 10 February 2012 09:12:10 Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > E.g. if you deliver boards/systems with u-boot on it and you do not > want customers to enter u-boot (e.g. by accident or because they want > to hack the board), but you would allow authorized service personnel > to access the board.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v8] arm926ejs: add NXP LPC32x0 cpu series support

2012-02-10 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Vladimir, Le 10/02/2012 21:14, Vladimir Zapolskiy a écrit : Hi Albert, On 10.02.2012 20:00, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Vladimir, Le 13/01/2012 01:42, Vladimir Zapolskiy a écrit : diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/cpu.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/cpu.c new file mode 100644 i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v8] arm926ejs: add NXP LPC32x0 cpu series support

2012-02-10 Thread Vladimir Zapolskiy
Hi Albert, On 10.02.2012 20:00, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Vladimir, Le 13/01/2012 01:42, Vladimir Zapolskiy a écrit : diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/cpu.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/cpu.c new file mode 100644 index 000..e29e130 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Convert spear3xx and spear6xx boards to boards.cfg

2012-02-10 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
(possibly duplicated, sorry) Hi Amit, Le 09/02/2012 12:02, Stefan Roese a écrit : On Thursday 09 February 2012 11:25:33 Amit Virdi wrote: Signed-off-by: Amit Virdi I have the same patch sitting in my queue. So, Acked-by: Stefan Roese Thanks, Stefan -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH,

Re: [U-Boot] please pull u-boot-samsung/master

2012-02-10 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Minkyu, Le 10/02/2012 02:01, Minkyu Kang a écrit : Dear Albert, The following changes since commit ca849aa4b86b282f837c58a0b129460ebfad2239: ARM: activate DISPLAY_CPUINFO for VCMA9 + SMDK2410 board (2012-02-06 22:47:25 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request for u-boot-marvell.git

2012-02-10 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Prafulla, Le 08/02/2012 10:57, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit : Dear Albert Please kindly pull The following changes since commit ca849aa4b86b282f837c58a0b129460ebfad2239: David Müller (ELSOFT AG) (1): ARM: activate DISPLAY_CPUINFO for VCMA9 + SMDK2410 board are available in the gi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] edminiv2: add hush parser, cmdline editing and long help

2012-02-10 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 08/02/2012 10:51, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit : Applied to u-boot-marvell.git master branch Thanks! Regards.. Prafulla . . . Amicalement, -- Albert. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] RFC: Let linker create phy array

2012-02-10 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 07/02/2012 16:20, Mike Frysinger a écrit : On Monday 06 February 2012 16:01:56 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Le 06/02/2012 21:57, Mike Frysinger a écrit : The would give me compiler warnings for unused variables. How does that help? does gcc issue warnings ? doesn't seem to do so for me. Some d

[U-Boot] [PATCH] cam_enc_4xx: Rename 'images' to 'imgs'

2012-02-10 Thread Tom Rini
To avoid a conflict with common/cmd_bootm.c's 'images' (which is exposed as part of the Linux SPL series), rename the board-specific 'images' to 'imgs'. Cc: Heiko Schocher Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- board/ait/cam_enc_4xx/cam_enc_4xx.c | 48 +- 1 files changed,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V13 01/12] Add cmd_spl command

2012-02-10 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: >>> From: Simon Schwarz >>> >>> This adds a spl command to the u-boot. >>> >>> Related config: >>> CONFIG_CMD_CPL >>>        activate/dea

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V13 01/12] Add cmd_spl command

2012-02-10 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: >> From: Simon Schwarz >> >> This adds a spl command to the u-boot. >> >> Related config: >> CONFIG_CMD_CPL >>        activate/deactivate the command >> CONFIG_CMD_SPL_NAND_OFS >>        Offs

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V13 01/12] Add cmd_spl command

2012-02-10 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > From: Simon Schwarz > > This adds a spl command to the u-boot. > > Related config: > CONFIG_CMD_CPL >        activate/deactivate the command > CONFIG_CMD_SPL_NAND_OFS >        Offset in NAND to use > > Signed-off-by: Simon Schwarz > CC: Tom

Re: [U-Boot] Formatting bootable SD, freescale platform

2012-02-10 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Joe Kulikauskas wrote: > Hello, > > Does anybody happen to know a reference with _details_ of how to format and > mkfs an SD card to be bootable for freescale platform? > > Background:  I'm using a freescale utility ( > https://github.com/kergoth/boot-format), but i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v8] arm926ejs: add NXP LPC32x0 cpu series support

2012-02-10 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Vladimir, Le 13/01/2012 01:42, Vladimir Zapolskiy a écrit : diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/cpu.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/cpu.c new file mode 100644 index 000..e29e130 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/cpu.c @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +/* + * Copyright (C) 20

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/9] tegra: Enhance clock support to handle 16-bit clock divisors

2012-02-10 Thread Tom Warren
Simon, > -Original Message- > From: Simon Glass [mailto:s...@chromium.org] > Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 6:14 PM > To: U-Boot Mailing List > Cc: Tom Warren; Stephen Warren; linux-te...@vger.kernel.org; Simon Glass > Subject: [PATCH v3 3/9] tegra: Enhance clock support to handle 16-bit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] davinci: cleanup davinci_sync_env_enetaddr() fucntion

2012-02-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx35: generic: Let get_reset_cause be defined only when CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is selected

2012-02-10 Thread Stefano Babic
On 10/02/2012 16:34, Fabio Estevam wrote: > get_reset_cause() function is only used inside print_cpuinfo(), so let it be > defined only when CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is selected. > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- Acked-by: Stefano Babic Tested-by: Stefano Babic -- ===

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] mx35pdk: Remove duplicate CPU revision and reset cause information

2012-02-10 Thread Stefano Babic
On 10/02/2012 17:29, Fabio Estevam wrote: > MX35PDK board does not need to print CPU revision and reset cause in board > file > because this is printed by common code when CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is selected > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- Acked-by: Stefano Babic Tested-by: Stefano Babic

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] mx35pdk: Remove duplicate CPU revision and reset cause information

2012-02-10 Thread Fabio Estevam
MX35PDK board does not need to print CPU revision and reset cause in board file because this is printed by common code when CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is selected Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- Changes since v1: - Introduce \n. board/freescale/mx35pdk/mx35pdk.c | 27 +--

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mx35pdk: Remove duplicate CPU revision and reset cause information

2012-02-10 Thread Stefano Babic
On 10/02/2012 16:34, Fabio Estevam wrote: > MX35PDK board does not need to print CPU revision and reset cause in board > file > because this is printed by common code when CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is selected > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- Hi Fabio, > /* Print board revision */ >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mx35pdk: Remove duplicate CPU revision and reset cause information

2012-02-10 Thread Stefano Babic
On 10/02/2012 16:34, Fabio Estevam wrote: > MX35PDK board does not need to print CPU revision and reset cause in board > file > because this is printed by common code when CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is selected > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > --- > Stefano, > > I don't have a mx35pdk board handy

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] mx35: generic: Let get_reset_cause be defined only when CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is selected

2012-02-10 Thread Fabio Estevam
get_reset_cause() function is only used inside print_cpuinfo(), so let it be defined only when CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is selected. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx35/generic.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/m

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mx35pdk: Remove duplicate CPU revision and reset cause information

2012-02-10 Thread Fabio Estevam
MX35PDK board does not need to print CPU revision and reset cause in board file because this is printed by common code when CONFIG_DISPLAY_CPUINFO is selected Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam --- Stefano, I don't have a mx35pdk board handy to try this. board/freescale/mx35pdk/mx35pdk.c | 25

Re: [U-Boot] Build u-Boot for NAND boot on i.MX53x platform

2012-02-10 Thread Stefano Babic
On 10/02/2012 16:05, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On 2/10/12, Stefano Babic wrote: > >> The mkimage tool supports the generation of the image that can be loaded >> into a NAND flash. However, the main problem is that at the moment there >> is no NAND driver for MX53. The mxc_nand.c driver does not supp

Re: [U-Boot] Build u-Boot for NAND boot on i.MX53x platform

2012-02-10 Thread Fabio Estevam
On 2/10/12, Stefano Babic wrote: > The mkimage tool supports the generation of the image that can be loaded > into a NAND flash. However, the main problem is that at the moment there > is no NAND driver for MX53. The mxc_nand.c driver does not support MX5 SOCs. Yes, but the internal boot mode ca

Re: [U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

2012-02-10 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Frans Meulenbroeks, In message you wrote: > Generally speaking there is a use case for a password. Of course there is. The question is if the oot loader is the right place for it. > E.g. if you deliver boards/systems with u-boot on it and you do not > want customers to enter u-boot (e.g.

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

2012-02-10 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear "Jason Markley (ggsg)", In message <4f351fdc.5010...@ggsg.cisco.com> you wrote: > > Again, what about the U-boot API feature? I want to use the API > feature, and have U-boot 'stick around' for more than 'a few > milliseconds' as you put it. In production mode, when using the API > feature

Re: [U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

2012-02-10 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
Generally speaking there is a use case for a password. E.g. if you deliver boards/systems with u-boot on it and you do not want customers to enter u-boot (e.g. by accident or because they want to hack the board), but you would allow authorized service personnel to access the board. For this case

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

2012-02-10 Thread Jason Markley (ggsg)
On 2/10/12 2:07 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jason, > > please keep the ML on Cc: > > In message <4f33e93e.5070...@ggsg.cisco.com> you wrote: >> Do you happen to have a reference to that presentation? I'm very >> interested, as i thought ASLR was in place to make it harder. I've done >>

Re: [U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

2012-02-10 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Marek, In message <201202101330.14119.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > Yes, but if you don't allow setting of environment variables from the host > > OS, how can you change the settings if you need to > > You usually don't want to frob with ie. CPU speed of your Xray :-D Medical devi

Re: [U-Boot] Build u-Boot for NAND boot on i.MX53x platform

2012-02-10 Thread Stefano Babic
On 08/02/2012 05:16, Bud Miljkovic wrote: > Can someone clue me in how one goes about a NAND bootable u-Boot? The mkimage tool supports the generation of the image that can be loaded into a NAND flash. However, the main problem is that at the moment there is no NAND driver for MX53. The mxc_nand.c

Re: [U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

2012-02-10 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Graeme Russ, In message <4f3505f8.1070...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > We already have such protection, even if it's very simplistic: see > > doc/README.autoboot (search for CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_DELAY_STR, > > CONFIG_AUTOBOOT_STOP_STR resp. "bootdelaykey" and "bootstopkey"). > > OK, so the though

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] Added NAND flash pin configuration

2012-02-10 Thread Robert Deliën
> So I can lean back ... I can even send you a patch of what I have, if that helps you out... ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] Added NAND flash pin configuration

2012-02-10 Thread Matthias Fuchs
On 10.02.2012 13:42, Robert Deliën wrote: >> Do you plan to post a patch to enable NAND on the EVK as well? > > Yes, I do. It's all tested and working in my workspace. But the first > samples of our own board have arrived a couple of days ago and I'm > currently in the process of bringing it up an

Re: [U-Boot] Enabling Cache in SPL - how to speed up booting from SPL

2012-02-10 Thread Stefano Babic
On 10/02/2012 13:28, Marek Vasut wrote: >> Hi, >> >> because we are fast able to boot the kernel directly from SPL, I am >> experimenting now how we can speed up the process. Mainly my focus is >> how to make copy from storage (=NAND) to RAM faster. >> >> There are two approaches I can see: using D

[U-Boot] Add SPL support

2012-02-10 Thread Prabhakar Lad
Hi folks, How to add SPL support for evm's that normally takes DSP secondary user boot loader (UBL) , Arm secondary UBL and then the U-boot. how to nullify this DSP secondary user boot loader (UBL) and add support for SPL in it? Regards, --Prabhakar Lad __

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] Added NAND flash pin configuration

2012-02-10 Thread Robert Deliën
> Do you plan to post a patch to enable NAND on the EVK as well? Yes, I do. It's all tested and working in my workspace. But the first samples of our own board have arrived a couple of days ago and I'm currently in the process of bringing it up and that has priority over everything else, hence the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] Added NAND flash pin configuration

2012-02-10 Thread Matthias Fuchs
Do you plan to post a patch to enable NAND on the EVK as well? That shouldn't be a big deal. Matthias On 07.02.2012 17:52, rob...@delien.nl wrote: > From: Robert Delien > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Delien > --- > board/freescale/mx28evk/iomux.c | 24 > 1 files chang

Re: [U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

2012-02-10 Thread Marek Vasut
> Hi Wolfgang, > > On 02/10/2012 10:38 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Graeme Russ, > > > > In message you wrote: > >> As an adjunct to a recent discussion, I wonder if there would be much > >> point in password protecting access to the U-Boot command line. The > >> password could be saved in

Re: [U-Boot] Enabling Cache in SPL - how to speed up booting from SPL

2012-02-10 Thread Marek Vasut
> Hi, > > because we are fast able to boot the kernel directly from SPL, I am > experimenting now how we can speed up the process. Mainly my focus is > how to make copy from storage (=NAND) to RAM faster. > > There are two approaches I can see: using DMA in NAND driver, or/and > enabling cache. I

Re: [U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

2012-02-10 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Wolfgang, On 02/10/2012 10:38 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Graeme Russ, > > In message > you > wrote: >> >> As an adjunct to a recent discussion, I wonder if there would be much >> point in password protecting access to the U-Boot command line. The >> password could be saved in an enviro

Re: [U-Boot] Does U-boot support ASLR?

2012-02-10 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jason, In message <4f3451de.3050...@ggsg.cisco.com> you wrote: > > Agreed, but in the grand scheme of things, does that mean the > maintainers of U-boot will ONLY allow patches in that fix the biggest > security hole that currently exists? If someone desires to patch a > small hole because

Re: [U-Boot] Password protection of U-Boot command line

2012-02-10 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Graeme Russ, In message you wrote: > > As an adjunct to a recent discussion, I wonder if there would be much > point in password protecting access to the U-Boot command line. The > password could be saved in an environment variable as an MD-5 or SHA-256 > hash. We already have such protec

[U-Boot] Enabling Cache in SPL - how to speed up booting from SPL

2012-02-10 Thread Stefano Babic
Hi, because we are fast able to boot the kernel directly from SPL, I am experimenting now how we can speed up the process. Mainly my focus is how to make copy from storage (=NAND) to RAM faster. There are two approaches I can see: using DMA in NAND driver, or/and enabling cache. I have not yet pa

[U-Boot] [PATCH][v3]powerpc/8xxx:Add MPH controller support in USB device-tree fixup

2012-02-10 Thread Ramneek Mehresh
Add support for fixing usb mode and phy type for MPH(Multi Port Host) USB controllers in device-tree nodes. Required for socs like P3060, P5020, etc having MPH USB controller Signed-off-by: Ramneek Mehresh --- Changes for v3: - removed const* type cast for node_type - used CONFIG_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] usb/mx6q: USB EHCI support for MX6Q boards

2012-02-10 Thread Dirk Behme
On 09.02.2012 09:33, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: v1 was bad, sorry. v2 fixes various issues reported by Dirk and Fabio. The patches are based on head of Stefano's "u-boot-imx" tree. Wolfgang Wolfgang Grandegger (2): usb/ehci: Add USB support for the MX6Q mx6qsabrelite: add and enable USB Hos