Hi Albert,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
wrote:
> Le 23/12/2011 12:30, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
>
>> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>>
>> In message<4ef452c7.1010...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Tom Warren has requested a pull of u-boot-tegra/next into
>>> u-boot-arm/master, which
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Érico Porto wrote:
> md 0 gives me in dmesg:
>
>
> [11753.433067] u-boot[4277]: segfault at 0 ip 0805283e sp bfb809f0
> error 4 in u-boot[8048000+1a000]
>
>
> On 12/23/11, Érico Porto wrote:
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Tried to do some memory display commands but got in
Hello all,
U-Boot v2011.12 has been released and is available from the git
repository and the FTP server.
ISSUES:
- We still have not found a new network custodian yet. I have neither
the competence nor the resources to help out much longer.
- Remy Bohmer has signalled that he has no longer
Hi Tom,
Le 23/12/2011 00:17, Tom Warren a écrit :
Alright, I hope I've gotten it right this time. I had already done a git fetch
of the u-boot-arm master (see my very first sentence below), but regardless, I
followed your 'always use commands' and I believe I've gotten a valid repo.
It's push
If CONSOLE_MUX is enabled, reevaluate console stdin when USB keyboard
device is detected.
Signed-off-by: Allen Martin
---
common/usb_kbd.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/usb_kbd.c b/common/usb_kbd.c
index e94bb7e..577a1eb 100644
--- a/common/
Dear Horst Kronstorfer,
In message <1324654820-24888-1-git-send-email-hkron...@frequentis.com> you
wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Horst Kronstorfer
> ---
> doc/mkimage.1 |4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software E
Dear Anatolij Gustschin,
In message <20111223170640.18cfe56f@wker> you wrote:
>
> > The code and comment disagreed: the comment claimed that r6...r31
> > were copied, and consequently the arrays for "src" and "dst" were
> > declared with 26 entries, but the actual code ("lmw r5,0(r3)" and
> > "st
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
In message <1324639752-26856-3-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
> The code and comment disagreed: the comment claimed that r6...r31
> were copied, and consequently the arrays for "src" and "dst" were
> declared with 26 entries, but the actual code ("lmw r5,0(r3)" and
> "st
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
In message <1324639752-26856-2-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Clean up and document the code:
>
> - get rid of unneeded code block
> - add comment which code is generated
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: Anatolij Gustschin
> Cc: Stefan Roese
> Cc: Kumar Gala
Dear Anatolij Gustschin,
In message <20111223133952.5e09a8b4@wker> you wrote:
>
> Looks good. A minor commend below.
...
> > -extern void cpu_post_exec_02 (ulong *code, ulong op1, ulong op2);
> > +extern void cpu_post_exec_02(ulong * code, ulong op1, ulong op2);
>
> IIRC checkpatch complains lik
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
In message <1324639752-26856-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: Anatolij Gustschin
> Cc: Stefan Roese
> Cc: Kumar Gala
> Cc: Kim Phillips
> Cc: Andy Fleming
>
> ---
> post/lib_powerpc/multi.c | 54 +
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
In message <1324564181-8949-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
> It appears that with recent versions of GCC the explicit
> "-mhard-float" command line option takes precedence over the
> ``asm(".gnu_attribute 4, 2");'' in the source file, so this no longer
> helps to avoid
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <4ef4b68d.9020...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>
> > If you have anything else queued up, then please send your pull
> > request ASAP. We skip the tegra stuff.
>
> Right now I have nothing left on master for you to pull.
>
> Accordingly, I'll pull the tegra repo into
The pointer to the registers used to control the Freescale ESDHC MMC
controller is not initialized correctly when using PIO mode. This is
fixed by initializing the pointer in the same way as all other sites
within the driver.
Examining the commit history shows that this was broken at introduction
From: Stefan
This patch adds support for D-Link DNS-325 ShareCenter NAS.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
Cc: prafu...@marvell.com
Cc: albert.u.b...@aribaud.net
---
MAINTAINERS |4 +
board/d-link/dns325/Makefile | 49 +
board/d-link/dns325/dns325.c
Le 23/12/2011 17:06, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Albert,
In message<4ef49931.7090...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
The branch is now correctly based above u-boot-arm/master, However, not
all commits are bug fixes. Can you reorganize so that all bugfixes are
in u-boot-tegra-master, and all non-bugf
Signed-off-by: Horst Kronstorfer
---
doc/mkimage.1 |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/mkimage.1 b/doc/mkimage.1
index 800aed4..39652c8 100644
--- a/doc/mkimage.1
+++ b/doc/mkimage.1
@@ -82,12 +82,12 @@ Set XIP (execute in place) flag.
.B Create FIT im
Hello Wolfgang,
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:45:42 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
...
> I have just pushed out -rc3, so we have two more days for testing
> before the release of v2011.12
>
> Please check that everythink looks as expected, and that all your
> important bug fixes have been merged.
Here is
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:29:41 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> It appears that with recent versions of GCC the explicit
> "-mhard-float" command line option takes precedence over the
> ``asm(".gnu_attribute 4, 2");'' in the source file, so this no longer
> helps to avoid the warnings we
Dear Albert,
In message <4ef49931.7090...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>
> The branch is now correctly based above u-boot-arm/master, However, not
> all commits are bug fixes. Can you reorganize so that all bugfixes are
> in u-boot-tegra-master, and all non-bugfixes are in .../next above
> .../mast
Hello Wolfgang,
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:29:12 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> The code and comment disagreed: the comment claimed that r6...r31
> were copied, and consequently the arrays for "src" and "dst" were
> declared with 26 entries, but the actual code ("lmw r5,0(r3)" and
> "stmw r5,0(r4)") c
Hi Tom,
Le 23/12/2011 00:17, Tom Warren a écrit :
Alright, I hope I've gotten it right this time. I had already done a git fetch
of the u-boot-arm master (see my very first sentence below), but regardless, I
followed your 'always use commands' and I believe I've gotten a valid repo.
It's push
Hi Erico,
Le 23/12/2011 15:03, Érico Porto a écrit :
md 0805283e
0805283e: 4489028b 1beba4bd 7502fb83 028b660d...D...u.f..
0805284e: 7d448966 c0b70fa4 028a09eb a43d4488f.D}.D=.
0805285e: 51c0b60f 75ff5047 90558994 059e2568...QGP.u..U.h%..
0805286e: aaefe808 558b 10c48
Hi Érico
Am 23.12.2011 14:19, schrieb Érico Porto:
> Thanks!
>
> Tried to do some memory display commands but got instant segmentation
> fault, and tried to run it as root - but then some bad things
> happened, so now I know no one should run it as root.
>
> I wanted to tryout a memory test algo
md 0805283e
0805283e: 4489028b 1beba4bd 7502fb83 028b660d...D...u.f..
0805284e: 7d448966 c0b70fa4 028a09eb a43d4488f.D}.D=.
0805285e: 51c0b60f 75ff5047 90558994 059e2568...QGP.u..U.h%..
0805286e: aaefe808 558b 10c48390 f739da01...U..9.
0805287e: f089b975 af0f
md 0 gives me in dmesg:
[11753.433067] u-boot[4277]: segfault at 0 ip 0805283e sp bfb809f0
error 4 in u-boot[8048000+1a000]
On 12/23/11, Érico Porto wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Tried to do some memory display commands but got instant segmentation
> fault, and tried to run it as root - but then some b
doing md 0805283e works
if I can change the base address now, every memory command should work
On 12/23/11, Érico Porto wrote:
> md 0 gives me in dmesg:
>
>
> [11753.433067] u-boot[4277]: segfault at 0 ip 0805283e sp bfb809f0
> error 4 in u-boot[8048000+1a000]
>
>
> On 12/23/11, Érico Porto wro
Thanks!
Tried to do some memory display commands but got instant segmentation
fault, and tried to run it as root - but then some bad things
happened, so now I know no one should run it as root.
I wanted to tryout a memory test algorithm I developed, but it seem
u-boot runs with no ram access. If
Hi Érico
On 23/12/11 23:46, Érico Porto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know if exists somekind of simulator to run u-boot in test mode?
Have a look at the sandbox 'board' - It allows U-Boot to be run as an
executable in Linux to test non hardware specific code
do:
make sandbox_config
make all
Hello,
Does anyone know if exists somekind of simulator to run u-boot in test mode?
I also have a spare qoriva platform (MPC5604B-TRK), which can't run
linux, but maybe could run uboot just to test some autoboot commands.
Thanks
--
Érico V. Porto
___
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:29:11 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Clean up and document the code:
>
> - get rid of unneeded code block
> - add comment which code is generated
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: Anatolij Gustschin
> Cc: Stefan Roese
> Cc: Kumar Gala
> Cc: Kim Phillips
> Cc: Andy
Hello Wolfgang,
Looks good. A minor commend below.
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:29:10 +0100
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: Anatolij Gustschin
> Cc: Stefan Roese
> Cc: Kumar Gala
> Cc: Kim Phillips
> Cc: Andy Fleming
> ---
> post/lib_powerpc/multi.c | 54 +++
---
arch/x86/cpu/start.S| 43 ++
arch/x86/include/asm/init_helpers.h |3 +
arch/x86/include/asm/u-boot-x86.h |2 -
arch/x86/lib/board.c| 87 ++
arch/x86/lib/init_helpers.c | 14 ++
arch/x86/
---
arch/x86/include/asm/init_helpers.h | 39 +
arch/x86/include/asm/init_wrappers.h | 42 +
arch/x86/lib/Makefile|2 +
arch/x86/lib/board.c | 289 +-
arch/x86/lib/init_helpers.c | 140
arc
---
arch/x86/lib/Makefile |1 +
arch/x86/lib/board.c| 113 ---
arch/x86/lib/relocate.c | 150 +++
3 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/relocate.c
diff --git a/a
It's not used for anything useful
---
arch/x86/include/asm/global_data.h |1 -
arch/x86/lib/board.c |4 +---
2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/global_data.h
b/arch/x86/include/asm/global_data.h
index 05a2139..ad15509 100644
-
---
arch/x86/lib/board.c |7 ---
arch/x86/lib/zimage.c |7 +++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/board.c b/arch/x86/lib/board.c
index 2b97b47..f201542 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/board.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/board.c
@@ -463,10 +463,3 @@ void h
---
arch/x86/lib/Makefile |1 +
arch/x86/lib/board.c| 27 ---
arch/x86/lib/cmd_boot.c | 64 +++
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/x86/lib/cmd_boot.c
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/Makefi
---
arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c|2 +-
arch/x86/cpu/interrupts.c |2 +-
arch/x86/cpu/start16.S| 54 +++-
3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c b/arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c
index 7ec0c12..70a864d 100644
--- a/
---
arch/x86/lib/bios.S| 134 +--
arch/x86/lib/realmode_switch.S | 61 +++
2 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/bios.S b/arch/x86/lib/bios.S
index ce8deb5..239aaa9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib
---
arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c | 20
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c b/arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c
index a8069ad..7ec0c12 100644
--- a/arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c
@@ -115,14 +115,6 @@ int cpu_init_r(void) __attribute__((weak,
Imported from Linux 3.1 with a few modifications to suit U-Boot
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 447 ++
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 216 ++
arch/x86/include/asm/mtrr.h | 203 +
3 files changed, 866 insertions
---
arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c| 16 +++-
arch/x86/include/asm/u-boot-x86.h |2 ++
arch/x86/lib/board.c |3 +++
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c b/arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c
index 61d0b69..a8069ad 100644
--- a/arch
---
arch/x86/cpu/start.S | 37 +++---
arch/x86/include/asm/u-boot-x86.h |1 +
arch/x86/lib/board.c | 76 +++-
3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/start.S b/arch/x86/cpu/start.S
i
The implementations of memcpy and memset are now the optimised versions
from glibc, so use them instead of simple copy loops
---
arch/x86/lib/board.c | 17 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/board.c b/arch/x86/lib/board.c
index d742fec.
Taken from glibc version 2.14.90
---
arch/x86/include/asm/string.h |2 +-
arch/x86/lib/string.c | 61 +
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/string.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/string.h
index 3aa6c11.
Merry Christmas everyone
After some positive feedback on my new x86 init sequence, I've reworked
it onto the tail end of some patches that have been sitting around in my
staging branch for the last few weeks.
Patches 1-8 should not be that interesting to most of you (although patch
3 is a precurs
Le 23/12/2011 12:30, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message<4ef452c7.1010...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
Tom Warren has requested a pull of u-boot-tegra/next into
u-boot-arm/master, which I assume is for inclusion into 2011.12. Once I
have checked that no major breakage is caused
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <4ef452c7.1010...@aribaud.net> you wrote:
>
> Tom Warren has requested a pull of u-boot-tegra/next into
> u-boot-arm/master, which I assume is for inclusion into 2011.12. Once I
> have checked that no major breakage is caused to the ARM boards, and if
> you're ok
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
Cc: Anatolij Gustschin
Cc: Stefan Roese
Cc: Kumar Gala
Cc: Kim Phillips
Cc: Andy Fleming
---
post/lib_powerpc/multi.c | 54 +
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/post/lib_powerpc/multi.c
Clean up and document the code:
- get rid of unneeded code block
- add comment which code is generated
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
Cc: Anatolij Gustschin
Cc: Stefan Roese
Cc: Kumar Gala
Cc: Kim Phillips
Cc: Andy Fleming
---
post/lib_powerpc/multi.c | 27 ---
1 fi
The code and comment disagreed: the comment claimed that r6...r31
were copied, and consequently the arrays for "src" and "dst" were
declared with 26 entries, but the actual code ("lmw r5,0(r3)" and
"stmw r5,0(r4)") copied _27_ words (r5 through r31), which resulted
in false "POST cpu Error at multi
Le 21/12/2011 20:45, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Hello everybody,
I have just pushed out -rc3, so we have two more days for testing
before the release of v2011.12
Please check that everythink looks as expected, and that all your
important bug fixes have been merged.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Wolfgan
Dear Wolfgang,
On 21.12.2011 20:45, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I have just pushed out -rc3, so we have two more days for testing
> before the release of v2011.12
avr32 is working again ... thanks
best regards
Andreas Bießmann
___
U-
54 matches
Mail list logo
