Re: [U-Boot] Question re: Bluewater Systems Snapper 9260 and 9G20 modules patch

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 04/06/2011 20:47, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Reinhard, > > > > I have been asked to have a quick look at this patch, which is showing > > accepted here: > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/81422/ > > > > The diffstat on pa

Re: [U-Boot] Question re: Bluewater Systems Snapper 9260 and 9G20 modules patch

Hi Eric, Thanks - but the bigger problem is that snapper9260.c isn't even in the repository! Regards, Simon On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Eric Bénard wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 04/06/2011 20:47, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Reinhard, > > > > I have been asked to have a quick look at this patch,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mx31ads: Use the new relocation scheme

Hi Felix, On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Felix Radensky wrote: ... > I've tested your patch on mx31ads. Unfortunately it bricks the board. > There are no messages on console. The latest u-boot version that > works on this board is 2010.09. I've compiled u-boot using ELDK-4.2. Thanks for testing

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mx31ads: Use the new relocation scheme

Hi Fabio, On 01/-10/-28163 09:59 PM, wrote: > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com > --- > Changes since v2: > - Use PHYS_SDRAM_1 in get_ram_size > - Remove local config.mk > > Changes since v1: > > - Fixed lines over 80 characters. > > Build tested only. > > Do not have the

Re: [U-Boot] Question re: Bluewater Systems Snapper 9260 and 9G20 modules patch

Hi Simon, On 04/06/2011 20:47, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Reinhard, > > I have been asked to have a quick look at this patch, which is showing > accepted here: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/81422/ > > The diffstat on patchwork is: > > MAINTAINERS |5 + > b

[U-Boot] Question re: Bluewater Systems Snapper 9260 and 9G20 modules patch

Hi Reinhard, I have been asked to have a quick look at this patch, which is showing accepted here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/81422/ The diffstat on patchwork is: MAINTAINERS |5 + board/bluewater/snapper9260/Makefile | 53 board/bluewat

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] dreamplug: include in 'make all'

From: Jason Cooper Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper --- MAKEALL |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/MAKEALL b/MAKEALL index d592374..35fc5b7 100755 --- a/MAKEALL +++ b/MAKEALL @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@ LIST_ARM9=" \ edb9315a\

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] dreamplug: switch from NAND flash to SPI flash.

From: Jason Cooper MPP._SPI_ configuration copied from boards/Marvell/mv88f6281gtw_ge/mv88f6281gtw_ge.c Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper --- board/Marvell/dreamplug/dreamplug.c | 18 +- board/Marvell/dreamplug/kwbimage.cfg |4 +--- include/configs/dreamplug.h |2

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] dreamplug: Initial support.

From: Jason Cooper Copied files from boards/Marvell/guruplug/ and did s/GURUPLUG/DREAMPLUG/g s/guruplug/dreamplug/g Also, added MACH_TYPE_DREAMPLUG 3550 registered with at http://www.arm.linux.co.uk/developer/machines/ Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper --- arch/arm/include/asm/mach-

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] RFC: Dreamplug support

From: Jason Cooper This is my first attempt at adding the Marvell Dreamplug to U-Boot. It compiles clean, and I've loaded it via JTAG and used it to dump the existing bootloader out of the SPI flash. I have _not_ used it to burn itself to the flash yet. I'm looking for comments before I try th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] build/mkconfig: Add EXTRA_OPTS argument to make to modify build

Dear McClintock Matthew-B29882, In message you wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > I see absolutely no sense in this, =A0We already have a way to specify > > such arguments, as you write yourself in your commit message. =A0Your > > new way is just more complicated,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] nand_spl/spiboot/sdboot: Add ability to have smaller middle loader

Dear y...@right.am.freescale.net, In message <1307042852-10385-3-git-send-email-y> you wrote: > > This patch allows some boards do define CONFIG_BOOTSTRAP to let them > build a MPL or middle program loader to setup the board before booting > to the full u-boot build. The advantage is that we are

Re: [U-Boot] (no subject)

I am requesting for your partnership in re-profiling funds I will give the details, but in summary, the funds are coming via Bank Of Taipei Taiwan.Contact me for further details (wen.le...@9.cn) Wen Lee. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de h

[U-Boot] [PATCH] SMDKV310: Enable device tree support

From: Thomas Abraham Enable passing a flattened device tree to the kernel. Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham --- include/configs/smdkv310.h |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/smdkv310.h b/include/configs/smdkv310.h index a7f5850..ca4e15c 1006

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] build/mkconfig: Add EXTRA_OPTS argument to make to modify build

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > I see absolutely no sense in this,  We already have a way to specify > such arguments, as you write yourself in your commit message.  Your > new way is just more complicated, more typing effort, and as such just > useless overhead. Did you no

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] build/mkconfig: Add EXTRA_OPTS argument to make to modify build

Dear Matthew McClintock, In message <1307131671-22745-1-git-send-email-...@freescale.com> you wrote: > Allow users to pass in extra defines via make so they can > modify the build. Example > > make P1022DS EXTRA_OPTS=NAND > > is equivalent to > > make P1022DS_NAND I see absolutely no sense in