Hi
On 9 January 2011 10:14, seedshope wrote:
> On 01/08/2011 11:15 PM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>
>> Dear seedshope,
>>
>> On 8 January 2011 00:53, seedshope wrote:
>>>
>>> From: seedshope
>>>
>>> Modify u-boot.lds from nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400.
>>>
>>> start.o: In function `clbss_l':
>>> nand
On Saturday, January 08, 2011 18:56:03 Thomas Chou wrote:
> + */
> +#include
space between comment and includes
> +#include
> +#define TINY_SPI_RXDATA 0
space between includes and defines
> +static struct tiny_spi_host tiny_spi_host_list[] =
CONFIG_SYS_TINY_SPI_LIST;
i think you only read t
On 01/08/2011 11:17 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 08/01/2011 16:10, seedshope a écrit :
>> On 01/08/2011 01:55 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>>> Le 07/01/2011 16:53, seedshope a écrit :
From: seedshope
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR point the last PHY of IRAM
and substract the global size
On 01/08/2011 11:15 PM, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear seedshope,
>
> On 8 January 2011 00:53, seedshope wrote:
>> From: seedshope
>>
>> Modify u-boot.lds from nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400.
>>
>> start.o: In function `clbss_l':
>> nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400/start.S:357: undefined reference to
This patch adds support for OpenCores tiny_spi.
http://opencores.org/project,tiny_spi
Signed-off-by: Thomas Chou
---
drivers/spi/Makefile |1 +
drivers/spi/oc_tiny_spi.c | 241 +
2 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mod
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Aneesh V wrote:
> John,
> On Saturday 08 January 2011 12:16 PM, John Rigby wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 28 December 2010 06:17 AM, John Rigby wrote:
Signed-off-by: John Rigby
+
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
Am 08.01.2011 um 13:18 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
> Le 08/01/2011 11:49, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
>
>>> In my investigations for 'NULL fixup' (-> see
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/89864/focus=89906)
>>> pointed out that only symbols in 'absolute fix
>
> Le 08/01/2011 11:49, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
>
> >> In my investigations for 'NULL fixup' (-> see
> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/89864/focus=89906)
> >> pointed out that only symbols in 'absolute fixup' loop could be 'NULL'
> >> if there is a not aliased/empty weak
Le 08/01/2011 16:10, seedshope a écrit :
> On 01/08/2011 01:55 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> Le 07/01/2011 16:53, seedshope a écrit :
>>> From: seedshope
>>>
>>> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR point the last PHY of IRAM
>>> and substract the global size.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: seedshope
>> Please fix the F
Dear seedshope,
On 8 January 2011 00:53, seedshope wrote:
> From: seedshope
>
> Modify u-boot.lds from nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400.
>
> start.o: In function `clbss_l':
> nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400/start.S:357: undefined reference to
> `coloured_LED_init'
> nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk64
On 01/08/2011 01:55 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 07/01/2011 16:53, seedshope a écrit :
>> From: seedshope
>>
>> CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR point the last PHY of IRAM
>> and substract the global size.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: seedshope
> Please fix the From: line in all patches in this set; it should not
On 01/08/2011 02:14 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi seedshope,
>
> Le 07/01/2011 16:53, seedshope a écrit :
>> From: seedshope
>>
>> Modify u-boot.lds from nand_spl/board/samsung/smdk6400.
> You're also modifying start.S. If you mention files in the patch
> summary, then please mention them all.
ok
On 01/08/2011 02:04 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Le 07/01/2011 16:53, seedshope a écrit :
>> From: seedshope
>>
>> Remove u-boot-nand.lds from board/samsung/smdk6400 and
>> use the common u-boot.lds of arm1176 cpu layer. This
>> patch also fix the building errors:
>>
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/s3c64xx/
Le 08/01/2011 14:17, Aneesh V a écrit :
>> Why use pointers here rather than weak functions?
>
> In fact, I hadn't thought about it. Maybe I was biased by the Linux
> implementation.The only reason I can think of is that pointer gives the
> flexibility of doing this assignment at run-time. Let's s
On Saturday 08 January 2011 12:06 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
Pressed the Send button too fast last time. Missed answering the last
few questions.
>> +
>> +void invalidate_dcache_all(void)
>> +{
>> +v7_maint_dcache_all(ARMV7_DCACHE_INVAL_ALL);
>> +if (v7_outer_cache.inval_all)
Le 08/01/2011 11:49, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
>> In my investigations for 'NULL fixup' (-> see
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/89864/focus=89906)
>> pointed out that only symbols in 'absolute fixup' loop could be 'NULL'
>> if there is a not aliased/empty weakly linked sym
Dear "MrGates",
please always keep the mailing list on cc:
In message you wrote:
> >> These indicate that in start.S,first instruction:b reset not jump success
> >
> > What do you mean by that statement?
> I am sorry that i have no clear.
> I mean that "b reset"statement does not jump t
Le 08/01/2011 11:32, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
> Dear Minkyu Kang,
>
> Am 27.12.2010 um 11:27 schrieb Minkyu Kang:
>
>> There is possibility that pointers set to NULL before relocation.
>> In this case, system is hang, because of r0 is invalid location in RAM.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
>> -
Dear Minkyu Kang,
Am 27.12.2010 um 11:27 schrieb Minkyu Kang:
> There is possibility that pointers set to NULL before relocation.
> In this case, system is hang, because of r0 is invalid location in RAM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Minkyu Kang
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.S |3 +++
> 1 files chan
Hi Albert,
On Saturday 08 January 2011 12:06 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> Le 22/12/2010 12:54, Aneesh V a écrit :
>> - Add a framework for layered cache maintenance
>> - separate out SOC specific outer cache maintenance from
>>maintenance of caches known to CPU
>>
>> - A
I'm working on adding EHCI support for our chips to U-Boot and I'm a bit
confused. In our case I have to replace the ehci_read/writel macros since all
of our EHCI registers are located starting at 0x800016F000400 (notice it's
a 64-bit address).
Anyway, to get back to my comment, it seems th
Hi Albert,
On Saturday 08 January 2011 12:34 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> Le 22/12/2010 12:54, Aneesh V a écrit :
>> 1. make sure that page table setup is not done multiple times
>> 2. flush_dcache_all() is more appropriate while disabling cache
>> than a range flush on the enti
Le 08/01/2011 07:36, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/config.mk
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/config.mk
>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
>>PLATFORM_RELFLAGS += -fno-common -ffixed-r8 -msoft-float
>>
>># Make ARMv5 to allow more compilers to work, even though its v7a.
>> -PLATFORM_CPP
John,
On Saturday 08 January 2011 12:16 PM, John Rigby wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> On Tuesday 28 December 2010 06:17 AM, John Rigby wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: John Rigby
>>> +
>>> +void board_init_f(unsigned long bootflag)
>>> +{
>>> + nand_
Hi Albert,
On Saturday 08 January 2011 12:24 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
>
> Le 22/12/2010 12:54, Aneesh V a écrit :
>> - Enable I-cache on bootup
>> - Enable MMU and D-cache immediately after relocation
>> - Do necessary initialization before enabling d-cache and MMU
>> - Changes
Le 04/01/2011 09:04, Alexander Holler a écrit :
> Am 04.01.2011 08:47, schrieb Alexander Holler:
>
>> Only CONFIG_CMD_SHA1SUM should have been used.
>> ---
>>README |2 +-
>>common/cmd_mem.c |4 ++--
>>2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>
> Sorry, have f
26 matches
Mail list logo
