Re: [U-Boot] u-boot for rsk7203

Hi, Fabio. 2010/7/14 Fabio Giovagnini : > Hi nobuhiro san. > Is it running really on rsk7203 u-boot? > > in the directory  board/renesas/rsk7203 > the file > lowlevel_init.S > > defines > PDCRL4_A > > but do not ise it. > So if the port are not set as Data bus, how the sysstem can boot? > I dont

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] [U-BOOT] Unify serial_device for zoom2 and zoom3.

From: Aldo Brett Cedillo Martinez Instead of using "struct serial_device zoom2_serial_device0" and "struct serial_device zoom3_serial_device0", we now use a single "struct serial_device zoom_serial_device0". Signed-off-by: Aldo Brett Cedillo Martinez --- board/logicpd/zoom2/zoom2_serial.h |

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] [U-BOOT] Zoom3: Add support for OMAP3630 Zoom3 board.

From: Aldo Brett Cedillo Martinez This patch gives basic functionality to OMAP3630 Zoom3 board. Signed-off-by: Aldo Brett Cedillo Martinez --- MAINTAINERS|4 + MAKEALL|1 + board/logicpd/zoom3/Makefile | 54 +++ board/logi

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2 v5][U-BOOT] Zoom3: Add support for OMAP3630 Zoom3 board.

From: Aldo Brett Cedillo Martinez This patch set gives basic functionality to Omap3630 Zoom3 board. And unifies serial_devices for zoom2 and zoom3 since both use the same struct. Thanks Wolfgang for your comments, the modifications done were: - Added entry to MAINTAINERS in proper order. - Macro

[U-Boot] [PATCH-V2 2/3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access

* convert meesc board to use c stucture SoC access * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax * moved CONFIG_SYS_HZ below board and cpu defines (purely cosmetic) Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint board/esd/meesc/meesc.c | 11

[U-Boot] [PATCH-V2 1/3] at91: Defined main clock frequency on esd at91 boards

Autodetection is undesired now Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint include/configs/meesc.h |3 ++- include/configs/otc570.h |1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/meesc.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH-V2 3/3] at91: Enabeling USB host on meesc board

There was an redesign, so USB is available now. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: Nothing changed but commit message Note: This patch depends on 'at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access' patch! board/esd/meesc/meesc.c |6 +- include/configs/meesc.h | 13

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 v2] AM35X: Add musb support

> These patches add support for musb in AM35x. > Changes from v1: > - Moved SCM definitions to am35x specific file am35x_def.h > > Patches have been created against uboot-ti/master tree (as on 9th July) > but they also apply cleanly to both denx/master and uboot-usb/master > as there is no i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 15/28] SPEAr : spear1300 SoC support added

On 7/16/2010 3:34 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Vipin KUMAR, > Dear Wolfgang, > In message <1279084204-3263-16-git-send-email-vipin.ku...@st.com> you wrote: >> From: Vipin KUMAR >> >> SPEAr1300 SoC support contains basic spear1300 support along with the >> usage of following drivers > > Are

[U-Boot] [PATCH] common: add a grepenv command

u-boot environments, esp. when boards are shared across multiple users, can get pretty large and time consuming to visually parse. The grepenv command this patch adds can be used in lieu of printenv to facilitate searching. grepenv works like printenv but limits its output only to environment stri

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] [U-BOOT] Zoom3: Add support for OMAP3630 Zoom3 board.

Dear Aldo Cedillo, In message <1279231344-16448-1-git-send-email-aldo.cedi...@ti.com> you wrote: > From: Aldo Brett Cedillo Martinez > > This patch gives basic functionality to OMAP3630 Zoom3 board. > > This version has been rebased againts u-boot-ti > > Signed-off-by: Aldo Brett Cedillo Marti

Re: [U-Boot] [PULL] U-Boot-pxa

Dear "Paulraj, Sandeep", In message <0554bef07d437848af01b9c9b5f0bc5d9f3e6...@dlee01.ent.ti.com> you wrote: > > Just curious to know > > Who will send the ARM pull request? The officiating ARM custodian,of course :-) [i. e. me] Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/p4080: Add support for the P4080DS board

Add support for the P4080DS board, with the following features: * 36-bit only * Boots from NOR flash * FMAN drivers NOT supported * SPD & fixed sdram DDR Signed-off-by: Ed Swarthout Signed-off-by: Emil Medve Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder S

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/p4080: Add support for initializing SERDES

Add support for initializing the SERDES blocks on CoreNet style QoriQ devices and the p4080 specific SERDES tables to know which actual componetns are enabled. Additionally, split out the Frame Manger (FMAN) into its specific ethernet ports instead of gross level of the full FMAN. Signed-off-by:

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/p4080: Add workaround for errata SERDES8

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood Signed-off-by: Emil Medve Signed-off-by: Ed Swarthout Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cmd_errata.c |4 + arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fsl_corenet_serdes.c | 283 + arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fsl_corenet_serdes.h |

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] powerpc/p4080: Add workaround for erratum CPU22

Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cmd_errata.c |4 +++- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c |7 +++ arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/release.S|6 ++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h |1 + 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 28/28] SPEAr1310 : spear1310 support added

Dear Vipin KUMAR, In message <1279084204-3263-29-git-send-email-vipin.ku...@st.com> you wrote: > This patch adds the support for spear1310 SoC. Currently spear1310 uses the > following drivers > - UART (PL011) > - designware i2c > - st smi (Serial Memory Interface) > - designware usb device > - de

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 27/28] SPEAr : Ethernet issue workaround is not needed when uboot is acting as flashing

Dear Vipin KUMAR, In message <1279084204-3263-28-git-send-email-vipin.ku...@st.com> you wrote: > From: Vipin KUMAR > > Ethernet/UHC issue workaround which resets the SoC has an unexpected effect > while using uboot as flashing utils firmware. So, excluding the changes for > uboot built as usbtty

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 25/28] SPEAr : Enabling GPT clock explicitly

Dear Vipin KUMAR, In message <1279084204-3263-26-git-send-email-vipin.ku...@st.com> you wrote: > From: Vipin KUMAR > > uboot needs gpt for timer operations. This clock was enabled from previous > level > booting software until now. This patch enables it in uboot explicitly Please note: the cor

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 24/28] SPEAr : Network support configuration

Dear Vipin KUMAR, In message <1279084204-3263-25-git-send-email-vipin.ku...@st.com> you wrote: > From: Vipin KUMAR > > This patch implements the review feedbacks provided by Ben according to which > board_eth_init routine should not return -1. Instead, it should handle the > errors itself (by pr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 21/28] Enable high speed support for usb device framework and usbtty

Dear Vipin KUMAR, In message <1279084204-3263-22-git-send-email-vipin.ku...@st.com> you wrote: > From: Vipin KUMAR > > This patch adds the support for high speed in usb device framework and usbtty > driver. This feature has been kept within a macro CONFIG_USBD_HS, so the board > configuration fi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 15/28] SPEAr : spear1300 SoC support added

Dear Vipin KUMAR, In message <1279084204-3263-16-git-send-email-vipin.ku...@st.com> you wrote: > From: Vipin KUMAR > > SPEAr1300 SoC support contains basic spear1300 support along with the > usage of following drivers Are you here adding support for a SoC or for a board??? Looks more like boar

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] [U-BOOT] Zoom3: Add support for OMAP3630 Zoom3 board.

From: Aldo Brett Cedillo Martinez This patch gives basic functionality to OMAP3630 Zoom3 board. This version has been rebased againts u-boot-ti Signed-off-by: Aldo Brett Cedillo Martinez --- MAINTAINERS|4 + MAKEALL|1 + board/logicp

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 14/28] SPEAr : Basic spear1300 architecture support added

Dear Vipin KUMAR, In message <1279084204-3263-15-git-send-email-vipin.ku...@st.com> you wrote: > From: Vipin KUMAR > > SPEAr1300 is an ARMCortexA9 dual core based SoC which supports > multiple peripherals such as ... > + printf("System is going to reboot ...\n"); > + > + /* > + * Th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 13/28] SPEAr : Supporting various configurations for spear3xx and spear6xx boards

Dear Vipin KUMAR, In message <1279084204-3263-14-git-send-email-vipin.ku...@st.com> you wrote: > From: Vipin KUMAR > > spear3xx and 6xx boards can be compiled in following configurations > 1. Environment placed in NAND > 2. console on usb device > 3. console on usb device with environment placed

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/28] SPEAr : FSMC driver support added

Dear Vipin KUMAR, In message <1279084204-3263-9-git-send-email-vipin.ku...@st.com> you wrote: > From: Vipin KUMAR > > Flexible static memory controller is a peripheral provided by ST, > which controls the access to NAND chips along with many other > memory device chips eg NOR, SRAM. > > This pa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/28] SPEAr : macb driver support added for spear310 and spear320

Dear Vipin KUMAR, In message <1279084204-3263-8-git-send-email-vipin.ku...@st.com> you wrote: > From: Vipin KUMAR > > SPEAr310 and SPEAr320 SoCs have an extra ethernet controller. The > driver for this device is already supported by u-boot, so configuring > board configuration file and defining

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access

Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, In message <12785794723562-git-send-email-daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu> you wrote: > * convert meesc board to use c stucture SoC access > * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax > * moved CONFIG_SYS_HZ below board and cpu defines (purely cosmetic) > > Signed-off-by: Daniel

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] at91: Defined main clock frequency on esd at91 boards

Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, In message <12785794721539-git-send-email-daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu> you wrote: > Autodetection is undesired now > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski > --- > include/configs/meesc.h |9 + > include/configs/otc570.h |1 + > 2 files changed, 6 insertions

Re: [U-Boot] Usage of bi_env ?

Dear Dirk Behme, In message <4c349814.2000...@googlemail.com> you wrote: > With U-Boot 2010.03 on an ARM board, the output of 'bdinfo' command gives: > > ... > env_t = 0x > ... > > The code in common/cmd_bdinfo.c for this is > > bd_t *bd = gd->bd; > ... > print_num ("env_t", (ulong)bd->

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] 8xx, kup4: add FDT support

Dear Heiko Schocher, In message <4c34853d.3060...@denx.de> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher > --- > board/kup/kup4k/kup4k.c | 59 > +++ > include/configs/KUP4K.h |4 +++ > 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) ... > +int fd

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] 8xx, kup4: minor configuration changes

Dear Heiko Schocher, In message <4c348537.4010...@denx.de> you wrote: > - nfs-options removed > - hda->sda changed > - mtd parts added > - loadaddress changed > - cmd-line length increased > - lcd stuff removed > - code cleanup > > Signed-off-by: Klaus Heydeck ... > + clrbits_be16 (&immap->i

Re: [U-Boot] [PULL] U-Boot-pxa

> Dear Marek Vasut, > > In message <201007142341.38179.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > Please merge into -master. > > > > The following changes since commit > d6f324d03d7829a1da1dee8b60f91b173a3976f0: > > > > Merge branch 'next' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nios (2010-07-14 > 22:07:41 > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PULL] U-Boot-pxa

Dear Marek Vasut, In message <201007142341.38179.marek.va...@gmail.com> you wrote: > Please merge into -master. > > The following changes since commit d6f324d03d7829a1da1dee8b60f91b173a3976f0: > > Merge branch 'next' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nios (2010-07-14 22:07:41 > +0200) > > are avai

[U-Boot] Please Pull u-boot-ti master

Wolfgang, Please pull u-boot-ti/master I ran MAKEALL and saw no issues. Regards, Sandeep The following changes since commit dce6538f5d21a0def8a4df5328d536abed3e136a: Nick Thompson (1): Davinci: SPI: add the missing v2 patch changes are available in the git repository at: git://git.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] da850 evm: Fix definition of 'pinmux' macro

> > Usage of parenthesis in pinmux macro definition changes the > definition of the macro and raises the precedence of '&' > operator inadvertently over '[]'. > > Signed-off-by: Prakash PM > --- > board/davinci/da8xxevm/da850evm.c | 22 +++--- > 1 files changed, 11 insertions

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] musb: fix compilation warning

> > Fixes below compilation warning > omap3.c: In function 'musb_platform_init': > omap3.c:123: warning: implicit declaration of function > 'omap3_evm_need_extvbus' > > CC: Remy Bohmer > Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta > --- Got an ACK from Remy offline Pushed to u-boo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] da830 evm: Fix checkpatch error on 'pinmux' macro

> > Existing code returns checkpatch error on pinmux macro definition for > not enclosing the definition in parenthesis. The error can be observed in > the patch generated from commit id > bdc9c6c7f77a9a63349ecb9f54b20ad34033a2ae. > So macro implementation is modified to fix the error. > > Sign

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: Add basic gpmc initialization for OMAP4

> > This patch adds a gpmc_init function for OMAP4 and adds calls to > > gpmc_init for existing OMAP4 boards: panda and sdp4430 > > > > Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman > > --- > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/Makefile |1 + > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/mem.c | 45 > > +

[U-Boot] Confirm...

Your email id has won ￡2,500,000.00 GBP.For claims,FullName, Address, Tel, Age, Occupation. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] ubifsmount fails after booting linux

On 07/09/2010 05:21 PM, Karl Krach wrote: > Hello, > Just for documentation: U-boot/mtdparts detected only the first 512Mb of the dual component flash chip while Linux (through the device tree) used the full 1024Mb. It seems that mounting a 1024Mb mtd device, which was created as 512Mb partiti

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91SAM9260/9XE: add support for MultiMedia Card Interface (MCI)

William C. Landolina wrote: > What is the status of this patch for getting MCI working on SAM9 CPUs? I am > working on a new AT91SAM9G45 board and would like to incorporate it if it is > ready for prime time. It is not clear to me who should be signing off on > this patch and if they have done

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AT91SAM9260/9XE: add support for MultiMedia Card Interface (MCI)

What is the status of this patch for getting MCI working on SAM9 CPUs? I am working on a new AT91SAM9G45 board and would like to incorporate it if it is ready for prime time. It is not clear to me who should be signing off on this patch and if they have done so. If there is work to be done on

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

Dear "Dennis Ruffer", In message <00ba01cb244a$629a4b90$27cee2...@com> you wrote: > > > Why would you want to do that? We don't use any FP code in U-Boot > > anyway. > > We have actually seen issues with the post memory tests using the -mfpu=neon > and -ftree-vectorize under gcc 4.4.1. So, I wou

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

> -Original Message- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot- > boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Denk > Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:58 AM > To: Vipin KUMAR > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Shiraz HASHIM > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with > USE_P

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

Dear Vipin KUMAR, In message <4c3eecdb.7000...@st.com> you wrote: > > Since this option -msoft-float is passed from arch/arm/cpu/config.mk, and it > is common for all arm configurations. Is there a good way to pass > -mhard-float.. Why would you want to do that? We don't use any FP code in U-Bo

[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Add support to initialize LIODN registers and portals

On the new QorIQ/CoreNet based platforms we need to initialize the "portals" as access into the Data Path subystem as well as Logical IO Device Numbers (LIODN) that are used for the IOMMU (PAMU). Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala Signed-off-by: Scott Wood Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips Signed-off-by: Kuma

[U-Boot] Unable to save environment variable in NOR Flash

Hi, I am having a board which is using PXA270 controller and connected to the PC48F4400P0VT00 Intel Strataflash. I am using the u-boot which is in the devel branch (version: PXA: Toradex Colibri PXA270 support

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: Add basic gpmc initialization for OMAP4

> > This patch adds a gpmc_init function for OMAP4 and adds calls to > gpmc_init for existing OMAP4 boards: panda and sdp4430 > > Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman > --- > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/Makefile |1 + > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/mem.c | 45 > +

[U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/p4080: Add support for CPC(Corenet platform cache) on CoreNet platforms

The CoreNet style platforms can have a L3 cache that fronts the memory controllers. Enable that cache as well as add information into the device tree about it. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala Signed-off-by: Dave Liu Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce Signed-off-by: Roy Zang Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi Signe

Re: [U-Boot] Support for SD/MMC for davinci boards ?

> > -- > > Regards, > > Rupesh Gujare > > > > Some time back there was an OMAP MMC patch which was ACKED but not > > applied. > > > > So I went ahead and added it to u-boot-ti. > > > > I had some days back agreed to take the DaVinci driver into u-boot ti > > but when > > > > I had a look at this

Re: [U-Boot] Unable to save environment variable in NOR Flash

Dne Čt 15. července 2010 14:20:04 StephenPaulraj Chinnadurai-ERS,HCLTech napsal(a): > Hi, > > I am having a board which is using PXA270 controller and connected to the > PC48F4400P0VT00 flash. > > I am using the u-boot which is in the devel branch (version: PXA: Toradex > Colibri PXA270 > suppor

[U-Boot] Question on non-muxed eLBC at Freescale PQ II/III

All, during schematic design of a MPC8377 based board I stumbled over an issue with the local bus holding various Nor-/Nand-Flash and SRAM devices. Freescale's eLBC Controller supports muxed and non-muxed addressing modes. All FSL reference schematics are using muxed mode utilizing an address lat

[U-Boot] Dataflash timeout error when changing clock speed

I have been using uboot with an AT91SAM9G20 processor. I use AT bootstrap to setup then uboot to load the kernel and start linux. This has been working perfectly until I tried to change my crystal from the default 18.432 Mhz to a 12Mhz. I am getting the following error when trying to load th

Re: [U-Boot] (imp) uboot image size

i am working on Powerpc. sorry for the late response. -SAgar On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 15/07/2010 00:35, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : > > Le 14/07/2010 23:49, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > >> Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > >> > >> why not keeping the list on Cc:? > > > > Wrong

[U-Boot] Does u-boot support CFI for NOR flash interleaving?

Hello, I checked the linux mtd drivers and found handling of interleaving. But I couldn't figure out any related or similar code in u-boot. So does u-boot support NOR flash interleaving when using CFI? Best regards, Alexander ___ U-Boot mailing list U

Re: [U-Boot] U-boot and AT91SAM9263-EK

Hello Alexander, i made a mistake in configuration (i did'n run mkconfig), uBoot 2010-06 works correctly. Sorry for the confusion. Best regards Radiovan Vapenik > Původní zpráva > Od: Alexander Stein > Předmět: Re: [U-Boot] U-boot and AT91SAM9263-EK > Datum: 14.7.201

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

On 7/15/2010 2:43 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Vipin KUMAR, > Dear Wolfgang, > In message <4c3ed008.1080...@st.com> you wrote: >> >>> ok, so the only way is to select the source file containing the fuction >>> from >>> libgcc and include at source level into your source u-boot tree. >>> I di

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

something like u-boot-sh$ make USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes Right? Ok Thanks a lot In data giovedì 15 luglio 2010 12:22:43, Wolfgang Denk ha scritto: : > Dear Fabio Giovagnini, > > In message <201007151151.58747.fabio.giovagn...@aurion-tech.com> you wrote: > > I did USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes modifing

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

Dear Fabio Giovagnini, In message <201007151151.58747.fabio.giovagn...@aurion-tech.com> you wrote: > > I did USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes modifing directly the makfile. > Is iot possible to specify this in board dependent config file? Why? Just pass it on the command line, or set it as envrionment var

[U-Boot] Nor Flash SST39VF6402B cfi compliant support

Hi all, In my experience the SST39VF6402B has become full compliant with CFI mtd interface just few linux kernel ago. In linux 2.6.17 it was not. I'm developing on U-Boot 2010.06-rc2-07985-g53f7677-dirty (lug 15 2010 - 11:41:21) is it compliant with SST39VF6402B Is among of you other people usi

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

Just for my info. I did USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes modifing directly the makfile. Is iot possible to specify this in board dependent config file? I'll send my patches as soon as i'll finish the porting on my boadl called mlcd7203 Regards In data giovedì 15 luglio 2010 11:13:08, Wolfgang Denk ha s

Re: [U-Boot] Support for SD/MMC for davinci boards ?

Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > > Hi Sandeep, > > Any plan to merge SD/MMC support patches [1] for davinci boards? > > I dont see these patches in u-boot-ti. git tree [2], Please correct me > if I am wrong or I have missed any discussions on these patches. > > [1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

Dear Vipin KUMAR, In message <4c3ed008.1080...@st.com> you wrote: > > > ok, so the only way is to select the source file containing the fuction > > from > > libgcc and include at source level into your source u-boot tree. > > I did the same but I started from the lib dir of linux kernel > > Hmm

Re: [U-Boot] mkconfig "arch" link generation

Dear Matteo Facchinetti, In message <4c3eb5b4.1050...@sirius-es.it> you wrote: > > > > Which code are you talkign about? There is no target mpc5121_config > > supported in mainline... > > > yes, No. > I've started from mpc5121ads_config but mpc5121ads_rev2_config is the same. > U-boot head ma

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

On 7/15/2010 2:34 PM, Fabio Giovagnini wrote: > Ciao Vipin, Ciao Again, > ok, so the only way is to select the source file containing the fuction from > libgcc and include at source level into your source u-boot tree. > I did the same but I started from the lib dir of linux kernel > Hmmm, I was

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/8] powerpc/85xx: Add memory test feature for mpc85xx.

Dear Timur Tabi, In message you wrote: > > > NAK. > > > > Please do not reinvent the wheel and add yet another meory test. Use > > one of the existing memory tests we already have - > > post/drivers/memory.c comes to mind. > > That code is not capable of testing more than 2GB of RAM. It assum

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

Ciao Vipin, ok, so the only way is to select the source file containing the fuction from libgcc and include at source level into your source u-boot tree. I did the same but I started from the lib dir of linux kernel Regards In data giovedì 15 luglio 2010 10:59:52, Vipin KUMAR ha scritto: : > C

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

Ciao Fabio, On 7/15/2010 1:45 PM, Fabio Giovagnini wrote: > I had a similar problem with sh2a 7203 based board and gcc version 4.4.1 > (Sourcery G++ Lite 4.4-206) > Verify if the undefined symbols are of libgcc. > They must be, because I can compile the source without USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes op

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

I had a similar problem with sh2a 7203 based board and gcc version 4.4.1 (Sourcery G++ Lite 4.4-206) Verify if the undefined symbols are of libgcc. Regards In data giovedì 15 luglio 2010 09:01:43, Vipin KUMAR ha scritto: : > Hello, > > While building uboot-2010.03 for any arm board, with USE_PR

Re: [U-Boot] mkconfig "arch" link generation

Matteo Facchinetti wrote: > Hi Stefano, Hi Matteo, > Yes, you're rigth, > but I'm tring to write nand_spl driver for add nand boot support for my > TWR-MPC5125 evaluation board. > In first step I take what I need from LTIB (freescale) and then I > adjust the code for uboot mainline. > The part

Re: [U-Boot] mkconfig "arch" link generation

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Matteo Facchinetti, > > In message <4c3d83f3.1040...@sirius-es.it> you wrote: > >> I'm updating my uboot to mainline and I have a question about a link >> generate from mkconfig (with mpc5121_config). >> > > Which code are you talkign about? There is no target m

[U-Boot] u-boot-2010.03 build errors with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes option

Hello, While building uboot-2010.03 for any arm board, with USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes is throwing the following errors. Any help would be appriciated net/libnet.a(net.o): In function `ip_to_string': /data/csd_sw/spear/drives_os/vipink/spear/uboot/u-boot/net/net.c:1886: undefined reference to `__bs