Hi kumar,
We are having QUAD MPC8640D based System on which all the
processors are sharing the same boot code which is residing on the 32bit
boot flash memory. i don't find any problem with this. But i just want to
know whether it will create any problem. My configuration is Processo
Hi denx,
Is there any support for LM90 temperature sensor on u-boot? Any
patches
Regards,
T.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi,
If you use the gmail, Select the raw message, and copy and paste
Others are similar.
Don't copy html format to your text file.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Tuma wrote:
> Hi, Kyungmin Park!
> Thank you for patch!
> But I have a question - how should I apply it?
>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:17:49AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>> After OneNAND IPL updated, apollon boot code exceeds 1KiB size,
>>
>> This patch reduces the apollon boot code
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
>
> Should this go through NAND
Hi
why the line 354 not include by ifndef CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH.
I defined CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH in my board head file (qi_lb60.h).
this line make compile error.
thanks for help.
in the lib_mips/board.c
--
347 #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH
348 /* configure available FLASH banks */
Hi,
I am a rookie as far as NAND boot debugging is concerned. I have
remote gdb working just fine. I wish to single step from the point the
macro for nand load starts(assembly code). (nand_load).
To do that, i set a instruction breakpoint on BDI3000 using the "BI"
command. looks like the cpu enter
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:10 AM, wrote:
> Thanks for 1) and 2).
> For 3), both results show GP register is modified.
> the result of ${CROSS_COMPILE}objdump --source cpu.o is:
>
> void flush_cache(ulong start_addr, ulong size)
> {
> 7c: 3c1c lui gp,0x0
> 80: 279c
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Andrew Dyer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:10 AM, wrote:
>> Thanks for 1) and 2).
>> For 3), both results show GP register is modified.
>> the result of ${CROSS_COMPILE}objdump --source cpu.o is:
>>
>> void flush_cache(ulong start_addr, ulong size)
>> {
>>
Dear Ben Warren,
In message <4ad18093.3070...@gmail.com> you wrote:
> Wolfgang,
>
> With this pull, I believe all net-related changes for 2009.11 are in.
>
> The following changes since commit cd77dd109c4a439519a78c32eddc42bdebc7a61f:
> Wolfgang Denk (1):
> Merge branch 'reloc'
>
> ar
Dear "Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU",
In message
you
wrote:
>
> > To clarify, you're saying that the patch linked above
> > just needs to be applied, right?
>
> Yes, I applied it asis.
> I tested it on mpc8572ds with ATI Radeon video card.
>
> > Was there a reason the patch wasn't applied back
commit 0e870980a64584a591af775bb9c9fe9450124df9 ("8xxx: Removed
CONFIG_NUM_CPUS from 85xx/86xx") breaks U-Boot on various boards,
namely the ones that call get_sys_info() from board_early_init_f().
get_sys_info() calls cpu_numcores(), which depends on probecpu()
being called before. But probecpu()
Hi Tom,
Sorry for not responding to this series very fast, because I wanted to
look into it carefully.
Below my comments on this patch
2009/9/28 Tom Rix :
> The header files usb.h and usbdescriptors.h have the same or
> similarly named structure definitions for
>
> usb_device_descriptor
> usb_str
From: Peter Tyser
>
>> From: Edward
>>
>> This patch fixes it:
>>
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/48103
>>
>> I still get this crash with latest head (u-boot
>> 2009.08-00338-gcd77dd1).
>
> Thanks Ed,
> To clarify, you're saying that the patch linked above
> just
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:30 -0700, Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU wrote:
> From: Edward
> > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:05 AM
> > To: Wolfgang Denk; Peter Tyser
> >
> > With -m relocatable, x86emu crashes because the op codes
> > tables are forced to GOT2 section:
> >
> > Video: ATI Radeo
From: Edward
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:05 AM
> To: Wolfgang Denk; Peter Tyser
>
> With -m relocatable, x86emu crashes because the op codes
> tables are forced to GOT2 section:
>
> Video: ATI Radeon video card (1002, 5b60) found @(6:0:0)
> videoboot: Booting PCI video card bus 6, fu
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:15:51PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
[...]
> >#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE1
> > ft_fsl_pci_setup(blob, "pci1", &pcie1_hose);
> >#endif
> >+fdt_fixup_esdhc(blob, bd);
>
> ft_cpu_setup() calls fdt_fixup_esdhc() for us now.
Fixed, thanks.
> >+fdt_board_fixup_esdhc(blob, bd)
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:18:16PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 19, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> >This patch sets memory window for Serial RapidIO on MPC8569E-MDS
> >boards.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov
> >---
> >board/freescale/mpc8569mds/law.c |1 +
> >1 file
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:17:04PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
[...]
> >+/* Chip select 3 - NAND */
> >+#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE0xFC00
>
> Is it possible to have it at 0xffa0 so we match other FSL boards?
No, not without reshuffling all the mappings. On MPC8569E-MDS NOR
f
Hello
A question regarding the next u-boot -rc.
What is the approximate time frame when the next u-boot -rc is expected
to be released?
Kind Regards
Poonam
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:17:49AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> After OneNAND IPL updated, apollon boot code exceeds 1KiB size,
>
> This patch reduces the apollon boot code
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
Should this go through NAND or ARM?
-Scott
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Steve Sakoman wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
>>
>>> Compile and run test of the Overo build was fine with Tobi card.
>>> Later today I will try some of the other daughter cards to make sure
>>> it works with
> Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
> >> The offset to the chip select is incorrect.
> >>
> >> The change 187af954cf7958c24efcf0fd62289bbdb4f1f24e,
> >>
> >> omap3: embedd gpmc_cs into gpmc config struct
> >>
> >> introduced a problem with the serial gpmc setup.
> >>
> >> This patch reverts the chip select
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:28:01 -0500
Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:31:25PM +0200, Roland Lezuo wrote:
> >> The following patch is needed to correctly assign the IRQs for the
> >> gianfar driver on the MPC8313ERDB-revc boards. E
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:01:32 +0530
Dudhat Dipen-B09055 wrote:
> > On Oct 9, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Dipen Dudhat wrote:
> >
> >> +void initsdram(void)
> >> +{
> >> +
> >> + volatile ccsr_ddr_t *ddr= (ccsr_ddr_t
> > *)CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_DDR_ADDR;
> >> + int d_init, dbw;
> >> + volatile ccsr_gpio_t *
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:47 -0500, "Andrew Dyer" wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:27 PM, wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:16 -0500, "Andrew Dyer" wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:21 AM, wrote:
> >> > I think I found a problem in cpu/mips/start.S.
> >> >
> >> > gp register is used to
Steve Sakoman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
>
>> Compile and run test of the Overo build was fine with Tobi card.
>> Later today I will try some of the other daughter cards to make sure
>> it works with all of them.
>
> Heh, I spoke too soon!
>
> U-boot appeared
Yes, that's what we're currently using, but the problem is a little
broader: I should answer to CAN messages in at most 100-200ms from
powerup, and that can be done in u-boot.
However, handing CAN transmission control over to Linux is quite
complicated nowadays, since it would involve passing st
Did you try "setenv bootdelay 0" in uboot?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Fortini Matteo wrote:
> Hi all,
> we've been working on a PPC512x board booting with u-boot + linux 2.6.24.6,
> and one major issue for our application is boot time.
>
> Right now, we went down to less than 6s boot time (
Hi
2009/10/12 akshay ts :
> Hi,
> I want to know what is the instruction for sleeping in ARM Cortex A8.
> I did execute a WFI instruction seems to be a NOP.
> void cpu_idle()
> {
> unsigned long tmp = 0;
> asm("b 1f\n\t"
> ".align 5\n\t"
> "1:\n\t"
> "mcr p15
Hi,
I want to know what is the instruction for sleeping in ARM Cortex A8.
I did execute a WFI instruction seems to be a NOP.
void cpu_idle()
{
unsigned long tmp = 0;
asm("b 1f\n\t"
".align 5\n\t"
"1:\n\t"
"mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 5\n\t"
"mcr
Hi all,
we've been working on a PPC512x board booting with u-boot + linux
2.6.24.6, and one major issue for our application is boot time.
Right now, we went down to less than 6s boot time (i.e. time from power
off to launch of the user app), even with some drivers installed, i.e.:
* CAN bus
Eric Benard wrote:
> nand_util.c:45:2: warning: #warning Please define CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF
> for correct output!
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Benard
> ---
> include/configs/cpu9260.h |1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/configs/cpu9260.h b/incl
Eric Benard wrote:
> main.c: In function 'abortboot':
> main.c:122: warning: too few arguments for format
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Benard
> ---
> include/configs/cpuat91.h |4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/configs/cpuat91.h b/include/configs
Eric Benard wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Benard
> ---
> board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c b/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c
> index 0b4f0d4..af8a4a2 100644
> --- a/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu92
Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> The following changes since commit 617da90c1dcf65428ddfb63fef897439950bc915:
> Tom Rix (1):
> Merge branch 't-next-marvell' into t-next-at91
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung master
>
I will merge thi
Hi, Kyungmin Park!
Thank you for patch!
But I have a question - how should I apply it?
Sorry, I'm not very skilled in UNIX/Linux.
I've saved all code from:
diff --git a/common/cmd_onenand.c b/common/cmd_onenand.c
index 9090940..2b8f01b 100644
to:
if (arg_off_size(argc - o
main.c: In function 'abortboot':
main.c:122: warning: too few arguments for format
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard
---
include/configs/cpuat91.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/cpuat91.h b/include/configs/cpuat91.h
index 0d3acf6..8746f70 100
nand_util.c:45:2: warning: #warning Please define CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF for
correct output!
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard
---
include/configs/cpu9260.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/cpu9260.h b/include/configs/cpu9260.h
index 4ef8566..
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard
---
board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c b/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c
index 0b4f0d4..af8a4a2 100644
--- a/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c
+++ b/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu
Dear Tom,
The following changes since commit 617da90c1dcf65428ddfb63fef897439950bc915:
Tom Rix (1):
Merge branch 't-next-marvell' into t-next-at91
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung master
Minkyu Kang (5):
s5pc1xx: support Samsung s5pc1xx
Hi Alemao,
Alemao schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> I have used UPM in a MPC83xx with LBC running at 64MHz.
>
> Now I have a MPC85xx, with LBC at 41MHz.
>
> It only works if I put a delay in drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c :
> nand_write_buf(), otherwise I lost one byte. But it takes t long
> writing, whic
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:00:15 -0500
Tom Rix wrote:
> I have merged arm/next into arm/master.
>
> There are new warnings in
> CPU9260 , CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF
> CPU9G20 , CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF
> GPUAT91 , CONFIG_NET_MULTI,
> davinci_dm355evm , CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF, generic_set_bit
>
Now OneNAND handles block operation only.
With this patch OneNAND handles all read/write size.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
---
diff --git a/common/cmd_onenand.c b/common/cmd_onenand.c
index 9090940..2b8f01b 100644
--- a/common/cmd_onenand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_onenand.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static inl
43 matches
Mail list logo
