[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-sh

2009-03-14 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Dear Wolfgang, Please pull u-boot-sh master branch. Best regards, Nobuhiro The following changes since commit 3c92217732edfc0016c3cbdc828471d013d23a36: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx are available in the git repository at: git://git.de

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx.git

2009-03-14 Thread Kim Phillips
Hello WD, Please pull a couple of fixes for mpc83xx: The following changes since commit 3c92217732edfc0016c3cbdc828471d013d23a36: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc83xx.git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Add bank configuration to FSL spd_sdram.c

2009-03-14 Thread Kim Phillips
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:59:20 -0600 "Liu Dave-R63238" wrote: > > From: Jerry Van Baren [mailto:gvb.ub...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 11:40 PM > > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Phillips Kim-R1AAHA; Liu Dave-R63238 > > Subject: [PATCH v2] Add bank configuration to FSL spd_sdram.c > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 83xx: correctly set encryption and I2C bus 0 clock

2009-03-14 Thread Kim Phillips
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:58:14 +0100 Norbert van Bolhuis wrote: > OK, no problem. > Eventually I'll get it right :-) > 3rd (and hopefully final) attempt: something is still wrong with the way you are submitting this patch: Applying: mpc83xx: correctly set encryption and I2C bus 0 clock error: pat

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] example/standalone: introduce STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR

2009-03-14 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <20090314124556.ga23...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > > the value could be exported to the environment to reduce the user mistake > > > when they try to use example's standalone application > > > > i dont really understand what you're trying

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] example/standalone: introduce STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR

2009-03-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 14 March 2009 09:19:01 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 09:12 Sat 14 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 14 March 2009 08:45:56 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > On 07:37 Sat 14 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Saturday 14 March 2009 07:13:0

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] example/standalone: introduce STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR

2009-03-14 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 09:12 Sat 14 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 14 March 2009 08:45:56 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > On 07:37 Sat 14 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Saturday 14 March 2009 07:13:02 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > that could be overwrite in follow

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] example/standalone: introduce STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR

2009-03-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 14 March 2009 08:45:56 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 07:37 Sat 14 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 14 March 2009 07:13:02 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > that could be overwrite in following order > > > ARCH > > > CPU > > > SOC > > > BOARD > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] example/standalone: introduce STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR

2009-03-14 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 07:37 Sat 14 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 14 March 2009 07:13:02 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > that could be overwrite in following order > > ARCH > > CPU > > SOC > > BOARD > > > > via the corresponding config.mk > > the idea sounds fine to me ... > > > the value

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2] example/standalone: introduce STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR

2009-03-14 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 14 March 2009 07:13:02 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > that could be overwrite in following order > ARCH > CPU > SOC > BOARD > > via the corresponding config.mk the idea sounds fine to me ... > the value could be exported to the environment to reduce the user mistake > when

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] example/standalone: introduce STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR

2009-03-14 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
that could be overwrite in following order ARCH CPU SOC BOARD via the corresponding config.mk the value could be exported to the environment to reduce the user mistake when they try to use example's standalone application Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD --- V2: fix a typo on the

Re: [U-Boot] At91 mass storage device

2009-03-14 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello, > I decided to do some digging and I see the not responding error reported > below. > I added a wait of 2ms to the  *dl_reverse_done_list(ohci_t *ohci) > loop. I'm not sure > how this affects everything else. > However, although I did not get the no response error, I did get the > STALL PI

Re: [U-Boot] At91 mass storage device

2009-03-14 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hello, > One thing I never understood is that after a power cycle with a usb > memory stick plugged in, > I always have to start and restart the usb probe to recognize the > storage device. > This happened in a previous version of u-boot (like 1.2.0) and it's > also the case with the current sourc