From: Bryan Wu
We should check the return of usb_new_device() so that if no USB device is
found, we print out the right message rather than always saying "new usb
device found".
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
this is against u-boot-usb.git ... apparently that has a l
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD ??:
> On 17:59 Fri 16 Jan , Jacky Lam wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Could anyone kindly tell me if u-boot supports itself as a mass storage
>> device?
> no, maybe MTP will be simplest to implement
>> Or if u-boot main stream support the a protocol so call USB
>> DFU
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Abraham, Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi Bryan,
>
> Sorry for the delayed reply. The sequence 'usb start' -> 'usb stop' -> 'usb
> start' works fine on Davinci and OMAP platforms.
>
Thanks for the reply. And 2 more questions:
- there is no timeout control in the wait_until_
Hi Arun,
> I want to configure my board as a PCI target, its based on
> mcf548x processor. What are the things to be taken care to
> configure a board as a PCI agent in u-boot?
>
> My processor can act as a PCI master as well as a target.
> I don't want master interface at all. I want to make my
>
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
v2
- tweak long unsigned vs size_t pointed out by Scott Wood
common/cmd_nand.c|4 ++--
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c | 12 ++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd_nand.c b/common/cmd_nand.c
On Thursday 15 January 2009 16:33:20 Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:32:37AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ int nand_write_skip_bad(nand_info_t *nand, size_t
> > offset, size_t *length, size_t write_size;
> >
> > if (nand_block_isbad (nand, offset &
On Monday 05 January 2009 03:17:00 Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > From: Brad Bozarth
> >
> > Higher spi flash layers expect to be given back a pointer that was
> > malloced so that it can free the result, but the lower layers return a
> > pointer that is in the middle of the
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD schrieb:
> for the next release we will introduce a weak function that allow you to add
> your own init and example to board at91 from nor
>
> please search on the ML Ronetix patch
Is a git repository with that patch available?
Michael Roth
__
On Sunday 18 January 2009 15:54:12 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> v2009.01-rc3 has just been released.
>
> Please help testing. If no new bugs are found and/or other urgent
> stuff needs to get pulled I plan to release v2009.01 on Wednesday,
> January 21.
thanks for your work !
btw, is the wiki page all
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Jerry Van Baren,
>
> In message <20090117230126.ga26...@cideas.com> you wrote:
>> Please pull u-boot-fdt.git to pick up a bugfix for 2009-01.
>
> And I thought we'd have a release this WE...
Sorry, I was a slow getting the patch in and a pull request out.
:-( :-( :-(
Hi everybody...
v2009.01-rc3 has just been released.
Please help testing. If no new bugs are found and/or other urgent
stuff needs to get pulled I plan to release v2009.01 on Wednesday,
January 21.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Z
Dear Jerry Van Baren,
In message <20090117230126.ga26...@cideas.com> you wrote:
>
> Please pull u-boot-fdt.git to pick up a bugfix for 2009-01.
And I thought we'd have a release this WE...
> The following changes since commit fadad1573fb16c90025f08a2861d6047d093cba7:
> Mike Frysinger (1):
>
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <1232217162-6888-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> The x86 based version of Darwin behaves the same quirky way as the powerpc
> Darwin, so only check HOSTOS when setting up Darwin workarounds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
> ---
> config.mk |
Hi all,
I want to configure my board as a PCI target, its based on mcf548x processor.
What are the things to be taken care to configure a board as a PCI
agent in u-boot?
My processor can act as a PCI master as well as a target. I don't want
master interface
at all. I want to make my board as a PC
On 22:09 Thu 04 Dec , Stefan Althoefer wrote:
>
>
> The patch is against "latest" u-boot git-repository
>
> Please (still) be patient if style of submission or patches are
> offending.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Althoefer
>
hi,
will you send a new updated patch series?
Best Regards,
15 matches
Mail list logo