I am sorry about the format.
My questions are: How can I support wireless network card on U Boot?
I want to implement a wlan mini-pci driver, But when I see U Boot source tree,
there is no codes related to wireless, do you have any suggestion on how to add
wireless support on U Boot? Or is ther
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:26:11 -0800 (PST)
Ron Madrid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > TEXT_BASE doesn't differ between the two - can we rm these lines from
> > here and change the value of the one in the board's config.mk file? If
> > the board can't boot from anything but nand, might want to put
>
> TEXT_BASE doesn't differ between the two - can we rm these lines from
> here and change the value of the one in the board's config.mk file? If
> the board can't boot from anything but nand, might want to put
> CONFIG_NAND_U_BOOT elsewhere, too.
Would it be appropriate to put the CONFIG_NAND_U_B
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Makefile |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index e4a184f..005b637 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -3147,7 +3147,7 @@ mimc200_config: uncon
Ben Warren wrote:
> Matheos Worku wrote:
>> Ben Warren wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Matheos,
>>>
>>> Matheos Worku wrote:
>>>
>>>
Hi,
I was wondering if a uboot ethernet PHY driver for Broadcom
BCM5481 PHY exists?
>>> What are you connecting it to?
>>>
>>>
>> Ben,
>>
>>
Matheos Worku wrote:
> Ben Warren wrote:
>
>> Hi Matheos,
>>
>> Matheos Worku wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if a uboot ethernet PHY driver for Broadcom BCM5481
>>> PHY exists?
>>>
>>>
>> What are you connecting it to?
>>
>>
> Ben,
>
> The CPU I would be using is Freescale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Fix broken NAND ECC HW switch and invert logic of if(!hardware) for easier
> reading.
Acked-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Scott
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
apply after my precedent fix for cmd_bdinfo
Best Regards,
J.
common/Makefile |1 -
common/cmd_bdinfo.c | 447 ---
include/common.h| 15 ++
lib_arm/Makefil
We have a need to build and package at the very least 'mkimage' for SuSE 11.1
and since we have multiple board targets in mind (MPC8641D, MPC8610, MPC5121e)
it does not make any sense to pick any in particular or build the entire
u-boot.bin just for a few kilobytes we need to prep kernels and init
Ben Warren wrote:
>Hi Matheos,
>
>Matheos Worku wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I was wondering if a uboot ethernet PHY driver for Broadcom BCM5481 PHY
>>exists?
>>
>>
>>
>What are you connecting it to?
>
>
Ben,
The CPU I would be using is Freescale MPC85XX family (with built in
GIANFAR MAC).
Hi Matheos,
Matheos Worku wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if a uboot ethernet PHY driver for Broadcom BCM5481 PHY
> exists?
>
What are you connecting it to?
regards,
Ben
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/lis
Hi,
I was wondering if a uboot ethernet PHY driver for Broadcom BCM5481 PHY
exists?
Regards
Matheos
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:29:09AM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> The version (ver_id) was not stored in the onenand_chip structure and
> because of this the continuous locking scheme could be enabled on some
> chips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash/
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:28:53AM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> This patch has to be applied on top of the patch submitted by Kyungmin Park
> on 2008-11-04:
> [PATCH] [OneNAND] Sync with 2.6.27
>
> It replaces my patch "[PATCH] OneNAND: Fix c
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:55:06PM +0800, Dave Liu wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash/next.
-Scott
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:24:07AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> Sync with OneNAND kernel codes
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied to u-boot-nand-flash/next, minus one instance of trailing
whitespace.
-Scott
___
U-Boot mailing
Clean up coding style of board config files.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/configs/omap3_beagle.h | 204 ++---
include/configs/omap3_evm.h| 184 +++-
include/configs/omap3_overo.h | 189 ++
Update ARM's if then else logic.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Changes in v2:
- Make make happy regaring if then else logic "each if can only have one else".
Don't take examples from mailing list without testing ;)
Version v2 makes previous version v1 of this patch obsolete
All mpc8548-based boards should implement the suggested workaround
to CPU 2 errata. Without the workaround, its possible for the
8548's core to hang while executing a msync or mbar 0 instruction
and a snoopable transaction from an I/O master tagged to make
quick forward progress is present.
Signed
This change is needed for mgcoge because it uses two ethernet drivers.
Add a check for the presence of the PIGGY board on mgcoge. Without this
board networking cannot work and the initialization must be aborted.
Only allocate rtx once to prevent DPRAM exhaustion.
Initialize ether_scc.c and the
Update ARM's if then else logic.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
examples/Makefile |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: u-boot-arm/examples/Makefile
===
--- u-boot-arm.orig/exampl
Fix broken NAND ECC HW switch and invert logic of if(!hardware) for easier
reading.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/omap_gpmc.c | 21 -
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: u-boot-arm/drivers/mtd/nand/omap_gpmc.c
=
On 16:00 Tue 11 Nov , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Fix broken NAND ECC HW switch and invert logic of if(!hardware) for easier
> reading.
>
SOB missing
Best Regards,
J.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/
On 16:09 Tue 11 Nov , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Update ARM's if then else logic.
>
sob missing
Best Regards,
J.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On 16:11 Tue 11 Nov , Dirk Behme wrote:
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> diff --git a/common/cmd_bdinfo.c b/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
>> index 6675241..087eda7 100644
>> --- a/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
>> +++ b/common/cmd
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/common/cmd_bdinfo.c b/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
> index 6675241..087eda7 100644
> --- a/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
> +++ b/common/cmd_bdinfo.c
Subject mentions avr32/cmd_bdinfo while
Update ARM's if then else logic.
---
examples/Makefile |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: u-boot-arm/examples/Makefile
===
--- u-boot-arm.orig/examples/Makefile
+++ u-boot-arm/examples/Makefile
@@
Fix broken NAND ECC HW switch and invert logic of if(!hardware) for easier
reading.
---
drivers/mtd/nand/omap_gpmc.c | 21 -
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: u-boot-arm/drivers/mtd/nand/omap_gpmc.c
Marc Leeman wrote:
>> linux version. My question is: is it possible to implement a java virtual
>> machine working with that version u-boot linux? I would like to know
>
> /me wonders what the one has to do with the other.
They are buzzwords chained together in a sentence that sounds like
Englis
> linux version. My question is: is it possible to implement a java virtual
> machine working with that version u-boot linux? I would like to know
/me wonders what the one has to do with the other.
--
greetz, marc
Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away.
crichton 2.6.26
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
doc/README.mpc8572ds | 167 ++
1 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 doc/README.mpc8572ds
diff --git a/doc/README.mpc8572ds b/doc/README.mpc8572ds
new file mode 1
>
> diff --git a/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c b/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
> index 3a8aef2..1140010 100644
> --- a/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
> +++ b/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
> @@ -174,6 +174,19 @@ void cpu_init_f (void)
> {
> volatile ccsr_lbc_t *memctl = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_LBC_ADDR);
> exter
Steven,
On Tuesday 11 November 2008, 조기성 wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback
>
> I have another question.
> UART 0,1,2,3 works fine.
> UART3 TX works good, but UART RX is not working.
>
> TX data is success, but RX is not working .
> maybe you can point me to the right direction.
No real idea, so
De: Daniel Rodríguez Margareto
Enviado el: martes, 11 de noviembre de 2008 10:36
Para: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Asunto: java virtual machine on embedded systems
Hi,
I write you in order to ask several questions related to our embedded system.
Basically, the main part of it is a NetDCU r
Stefan,
Thank you for the feedback
I have another question.
UART 0,1,2,3 works fine.
UART3 TX works good, but UART RX is not working.
TX data is success, but RX is not working .
maybe you can point me to the right direction.
I use pcs440ep.h 's CONFIG_SYS_4xx_GPIO_TABLE ,
Best Regards.
St
Hi Ben,
Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >>
> > [snip]
> >
> >>> #if defined(CONFIG_ETHER_ON_SCC) && defined(CONFIG_CMD_NET)
> >>>
> >>>
> >> While you're mucking around wi
The version (ver_id) was not stored in the onenand_chip structure and
because of this the continuous locking scheme could be enabled on some
chips.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch has to be applied on top of the patch submitted by Kyungmin Park
on 2008-11-04:
[PATCH]
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This patch has to be applied on top of the patch submitted by Kyungmin Park
on 2008-11-04:
[PATCH] [OneNAND] Sync with 2.6.27
It replaces my patch "[PATCH] OneNAND: Fix compiler warnings and add weak
attribute to memcpy_16()". The weak method is
On Tuesday 11 November 2008, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> > I'm still new to OneNAND and I couldn't
> > find any reference to this continuous locking scheme in the OneNAND chip
> > used here. Do you have any idea why this is not working for us? Do you
> > know for sure if the KFG1216U2B (Dev-ID 0x25) rea
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Kyungmin,
>
> I'm experiencing a problem with one OneNAND device on our board:
>
> KFG1216U2B (512Mbit)
>
> Here the output from the U-Boot bootup:
>
> OneNAND 64MB 2.65/3.3V 16-bit (0x25)
> OneNAND version = 0x022e
Hi Kyungmin,
I'm experiencing a problem with one OneNAND device on our board:
KFG1216U2B (512Mbit)
Here the output from the U-Boot bootup:
OneNAND 64MB 2.65/3.3V 16-bit (0x25)
OneNAND version = 0x022e
Lock scheme is Continuous Lock
Scanning device for bad blocks
OneNAND: 64 MB
As you can see t
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 22:49 -0800, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> Michael,
>
> I tried to reproduce the bug you mentioned (multiple appearance of
> directories in ls output) using the script you provided, to no avail:
> ls correctly showed the top-level directory, both with and without
> CFG_JFFS2_SORT
42 matches
Mail list logo
