Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OneNAND: Fix compiler warnings and add weak attribute to memcpy_16()

2008-11-07 Thread Stefan Roese
On Friday 07 November 2008, Scott Wood wrote: > Stefan Roese wrote: > > This patch adds memcpy_16_from_onenand() and memcpy_16_to_onenand() > > functions and defaults them to the already available memcpy_16() > > function. They are defined weak so that they can be overwritten by > > a board/platfor

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OneNAND: Bad block aware read/write command support

2008-11-07 Thread Stefan Roese
On Friday 07 November 2008, Scott Wood wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:01:13PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > > Update OneNAND command to support bad block awareness. > > Also change the OneNAND command style to better match the > > NAND version. > > Is there any chance that we could merge this c

Re: [U-Boot] Broken network for different u-boot compilation

2008-11-07 Thread Sriram Chadalavada
Dear Uboot community, I have a Cirrus Logic EDB7312 prototype evaluation board and want to port uboot to it. Is the newsgroup still functional? I was not able to access it via thunderbird. Regards, Ram On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Duy-Ky Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hello, >

Re: [U-Boot] AT91RM9200 boots from NOR Flash or not

2008-11-07 Thread Pink Boy
Martin Hejnfelt sez, > Message from Jens Scharsig, >> I am a little bit confused. We have designed a new AT91RM9200 >> based board. It should boot from 16-bit NOR Flash. I have read >> many relevant article in the forum, but I don't know , which >> board should I use as a base. I have look at

Re: [U-Boot] Broken network for different u-boot compilation

2008-11-07 Thread Duy-Ky Nguyen
Hello, I'm using u-boot 1.3.0 from the latest FreeScale Linux BSP MPC8313E-RDB. If I set TEXT_BASE = 0x100, so I could use BDI debugger to load into RAM and run it out of RAM. I'm ABLE to ping to the host from u-boot But, if I set TEXT_BASE=0xFE00, and burn the image it into Flash, recyc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OneNAND: Fix compiler warnings and add weak attribute to memcpy_16()

2008-11-07 Thread Scott Wood
Stefan Roese wrote: > This patch adds memcpy_16_from_onenand() and memcpy_16_to_onenand() > functions and defaults them to the already available memcpy_16() > function. They are defined weak so that they can be overwritten by > a board/platform specific version. > > This is needed for the vcth boa

[U-Boot] [PATCH] drivers/bios_emulator: Move conditional compilation to Makefile

2008-11-07 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/bios_emulator/Makefile |3 ++- drivers/bios_emulator/atibios.c |5 - drivers/bios_emulator/besys.c |4 drivers/bios_emulator/bios.c|4 drivers/bios_e

[U-Boot] [PATCH] drivers/usb: Move conditional compilation to Makefile

2008-11-07 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/usb/Makefile| 19 +-- drivers/usb/isp116x-hcd.c |4 drivers/usb/sl811_usb.c |3 --- drivers/usb/usb_ohci.c |4 drivers/usb/usbdcore_ep0.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OneNAND: Bad block aware read/write command support

2008-11-07 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:01:13PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > Update OneNAND command to support bad block awareness. > Also change the OneNAND command style to better match the > NAND version. Is there any chance that we could merge this code with cmd_nand.c? > +static struct mtd_info *mtd = &o

Re: [U-Boot] Broken network for different u-boot compilation

2008-11-07 Thread Duy-Ky Nguyen
Hello, I'm using u-boot 1.3.0 from the latest FreeScale Linux BSP MPC8313E-RDB. If I set TEXT_BASE = 0x100, so I could use BDI debugger to load into RAM and run it out of RAM. I'm ABLE to ping to the host from u-boot But, if I set TEXT_BASE=0xFE00, and burn the image it into Flash, recyc

[U-Boot] [PATCH RFC] at91sam9/at91cap: move common initialisation to cpu

2008-11-07 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- The idea is to reduce common code initialisation which is actually in board. as done on afeb9260 and Ronetix eval board for 9260 & 9263 Best Regards, J. board/afeb9260/afeb9260.c | 32 ++-- board/atm

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc8641: Try to detect old .dts files

2008-11-07 Thread Becky Bruce
Since we've changed the memory map of the board, be nice and add some checking to try to catch out-of-date .dts files. We do this by checking the CCSRBAR location in the .dts and comparing it to the CCSRBAR location in u-boot. If they don't match, a warning msg is printed. This isn't foolproof,

[U-Boot] [PATCH] OneNAND: Fix compiler warnings and add weak attribute to memcpy_16()

2008-11-07 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch adds memcpy_16_from_onenand() and memcpy_16_to_onenand() functions and defaults them to the already available memcpy_16() function. They are defined weak so that they can be overwritten by a board/platform specific version. This is needed for the vcth board support (still to come) which

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] OneNAND: Bad block aware read/write command support

2008-11-07 Thread Stefan Roese
Update OneNAND command to support bad block awareness. Also change the OneNAND command style to better match the NAND version. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- v2: - Removed the bad block marking when an erase/read/write access to a bl

Re: [U-Boot] broken lib_arm/boom.c/do_bootm_linux()

2008-11-07 Thread Kumar Gala
On Nov 7, 2008, at 5:07 AM, Ilko Iliev wrote: > Hi, > > There is a bug in lib_arm/boom.c/do_bootm_linux(): >if ((flag != 0) || (flag != BOOTM_STATE_OS_GO)) >return 1; > > The parameter "flag" is 0 and the above condition is always true. > > The result is - the boom command doesn't sta

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (cpu folder)

2008-11-07 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
"Antonio R. Costa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As we agreed with Haavard I'll try to make a general SDHC patch for all > Atmel platform soon. Note that there's a generic MMC framework in the works: http://www.nabble.com/-U-Boot---PATCH-00-10--Add-MMC-Framework-td20256840.html which we should p

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: add support for PM9261 board

2008-11-07 Thread Ilko Iliev
This patch adds support for the PM9261 board of Ronetix GmbH (www.ronetix.at) Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- MAKEALL |1 + Makefile|3 + board/ronetix/pm9261/Makefile | 60 + boa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/6] AT572D940HF-EB Support v2 (cpu folder)

2008-11-07 Thread Antonio R. Costa
Hi JC, I'm very sorry for the delayed answer. I'm pretty close to release a Linux patch for our platform so no time for now. Anyway by the end of the year I would like to launch the complete BSP for our platform so I would like to make all things tidy. As we agreed with Haavard I'll try to ma

[U-Boot] broken lib_arm/boom.c/do_bootm_linux()

2008-11-07 Thread Ilko Iliev
Hi, There is a bug in lib_arm/boom.c/do_bootm_linux(): if ((flag != 0) || (flag != BOOTM_STATE_OS_GO)) return 1; The parameter "flag" is 0 and the above condition is always true. The result is - the boom command doesn't start the kernel. Affected targets: all arm based. Maybe it sho

Re: [U-Boot] AT91RM9200 boots from NOR Flash or not

2008-11-07 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jens, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I can do this in few weeks. But I have only our costum board. So I can't > test the interaktion with other boards. I can test on the DK, and eventually on the cmc_pu2. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH,