On 1/13/25 05:17, Manuela Friedrich wrote:
It seems that your commit 1ee9daa91818f5d4ab6937352453813fa333e105
fails with:
localtime.c(309): error C2099: initializer is not a constant
Thanks for reporting that. Which compiler are you using and what version
and what compiler flags are you using?
On 1/13/25 13:12, Carlos Raúl Perasso wrote:
Is it possible to include Paraguay's change in the next release?
Yes, we're planning a release soon, and it'll have the Paraguay change.
As far as I know, the only remaining item needing attention before a
release is the MSVC issue mentioned on the
Thanks Paul!
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 6:36 PM Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 1/13/25 13:12, Carlos Raúl Perasso wrote:
> > Is it possible to include Paraguay's change in the next release?
>
> Yes, we're planning a release soon, and it'll have the Paraguay change.
> As far as I know, the only remaining i
Hi,
Is it possible to include Paraguay's change in the next release? I
understand the "silly season" implications, but given the fact that the
change comes in the form of a Law, not a Decree, it's quite difficult for
it to revert before March.
https://silpy.congreso.gov.py/web/descarga/ley-144874
