You should really consider making in freeware/opensource.
You'll gain something: other people will find bugs and make enhancements.
Your own applications will then be better. And you'll enter the hall of
fames :-)
Always been a bit skeptic about open source,
how do you make money from that :)
Hello ,
Anyone has any idea how to make OverbyteIcsSslMailSnd.exe send mails
through smtp.gmail.com? Whatever I try there, it just doesn't send.
What parameters and buttons order should be used?
--
Best regards,
Antol mailto:spama...@mail.ru
--
To unsubscribe or
Antol wrote:
> Hello ,
>
> Anyone has any idea how to make OverbyteIcsSslMailSnd.exe send mails
> through smtp.gmail.com? Whatever I try there, it just doesn't send.
> What parameters and buttons order should be used?
Either:
Host: smtp.googlemail.com / or smtp.gmail.com
Port: 25
SSL-Type:
> Anyone has any idea how to make OverbyteIcsSslMailSnd.exe send
> mails through smtp.gmail.com?
Goggle only support SSL, so you must use a mail demo supporting SSL.
Angus
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailm
Arno Garrels wrote:
> Antol wrote:
>> Hello ,
>>
>> Anyone has any idea how to make OverbyteIcsSslMailSnd.exe send
>> mails through smtp.gmail.com? Whatever I try there, it just
>> doesn't send. What parameters and buttons order should be used?
>
> Either:
>
> Host: smtp.googlemail.com / or
Arno Garrels wrote:
> Arno Garrels wrote:
>> Antol wrote:
>>> Hello ,
>>>
>>> Anyone has any idea how to make OverbyteIcsSslMailSnd.exe send
>>> mails through smtp.gmail.com? Whatever I try there, it just
>>> doesn't send. What parameters and buttons order should be used?
>>
>> Either:
>>
>
A kind of related note - if you are downloading mail from Gmail (using POP3)
Gmail does not behave as usual servers where you issue RETR command and
deletes message only after you issue DELE command but instead it uses
settings from Gmail account and seems to ignore DELE command completely. If
you
Hello Arno,
Tuesday, February 22, 2011, 3:42:39 PM, you wrote:
>> Ah forgot the button-sequence on the left.
>> Connect | Ehlo | StartTLS | Ehlo | Auth |..as usual
It says:
RequestDone Rq=0 Error=SSL Handshake failed EIcsSsleayException File not found:
SSLEAY32.DLL
It seems that I don't hav
When I looked at Indy and Ararat Synapse they both prefer blocking sockets
to connect to text-based protocols like HTTP, POP, SMTP, FTP etc.
The reason - because communication is flowed - you send command, you wait
reply, if reply does not match you handle error. It is all nice line-by-line
inline
See:
http://wiki.overbyte.be/wiki/index.php/ICS_Download
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
I much prefer non-blocking. While receiving data from a httpcli f.e or over
a slow connection etc, my app keeps running while waiting for data. without
having to complicate it all with extra threads for everything.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Zvone wrote:
> When I looked at Indy and Ararat
Abstraction classes, events and complexity are consulting bargains ;-)
-Message d'origine-
From: Zvone
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 2:26 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: [twsocket] Why ICS prefers non-blocking sockets?
So I am wondering why ICS prefers events when the code i
Zvone wrote:
> When I looked at Indy and Ararat Synapse they both prefer blocking
> sockets to connect to text-based protocols like HTTP, POP, SMTP, FTP
> etc.
The main advantage of non-blocking is that you do not need one thread
per connection. Writing multi-threaded applications is not easy and
Let's say you are writing a multi-socket HTTP downloader such as the one in
the ICS demo. With sync/blocking sockets, you would have to launch multiple
threads per file. Why would you launch 4 threads for a 4Mbps DSL download
with thread syncronization hassle?
We use ICS async logic in our IQ Prox
> So I am wondering why ICS prefers events when the code is so much
> simpler without them?
ICS does not prefer events, it offers both blocking synchronous and
non-blocking async versions of most high level component methods.
So developers can make their own choice depending on application nee
> It is all much better explained here why blocking is better:
> http://www.ararat.cz/synapse/doku.php/about
I would not say that blocking is "better". Programming with synchronous
functions needs less callbacks and thus gives more compact code at the cost
of performance. If this is OK depends on
It is all much better explained here why blocking is better:
Maybe you should not believe everything you read on a web page...
Maybe you should use one of those libraries...
So I am wondering why ICS prefers events when the code is
so much simpler without them?
That's simply wrong.
Event d
Hello Zvone,
Thanks all, finally it works!
Tuesday, February 22, 2011, 4:28:23 PM, you wrote:
Z> See:
Z> http://wiki.overbyte.be/wiki/index.php/ICS_Download
--
Best regards,
Antolmailto:spama...@mail.ru
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mail
Hi !
Every ICS user is invited to be part of ICS-group on Linked-In.
See http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/136245
Why ?
Just to have a little bit more visibility for everyone of us and for ICS.
There is another one on FaceBook:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/ICS-Internet-Component-Suite/394936221
19 matches
Mail list logo
