So perhaps we should assume Services are more kernel-level than user-level
in terms of being able to crash Windows?!
Thanks,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket]
Hello,
Problem solved, IE wasn't setup for authentication for some reason.
Now to another problem in THttpSrv.
I really like to have an option to select which authentication
methods the server provides in its 401 response. I mean I want
to be able to provide any possible combination of the three
Francois PIETTE wrote:
>>Thanks for the pointer. Im guessing the API for the Delphi and Kylix
>>versions are the same so all we need to do is have the different ICS
>>libary on each platform to successfully compile without changing source
>>code.
>>
>>
>
>That was the goal of my Kylix port. St
> So perhaps we should assume Services are more kernel-level than
> user-level in terms of being able to crash Windows?!
There are service applications and service drivers, the latter are
obviously running at a lower level but can not be created using Delphi.
Service applications are no differ
Hello,
I think using a list/set of TAuthTypes is a cool idea. I am planning in the
GUI a checkbox scheme. The most complex one should have the biggest priority
(Digest then Basic instead of Basic then Digest in www-authenticate order
for example).
Best Regards,
SubZero
- Original Message
Hello,
I have not used regular expressions school and wonder what would be the
complexity of such code. Does anybody have any idea? Any offers to do the
job in Delphi or BCB 2006? (Delphi code must be tested in BCB in the end.)
Best Regards,
SubZero
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think using a list/set of TAuthTypes is a cool idea. I am planning
> in the GUI a checkbox scheme. The most complex one should have the
> biggest priority (Digest then Basic instead of Basic then Digest in
> www-authenticate order for example).
The only
> What do you think?
Agreed for V6.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author of ICS (Internet Component Suite, freeware)
Author of MidWare (Multi-tier framework, freeware)
http://www.overbyte.be
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, S
No problem for us as well.
- Original Message -
From: "Francois Piette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Webserv demo authentication
:> What do you think?
:
: Agreed for V6.
: --
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Auth
Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> I think using a list/set of TAuthTypes is a cool idea. I am planning in the
> GUI a checkbox scheme. The most complex one should have the biggest priority
>
> (Digest then Basic instead of Basic then Digest in www-authenticate order
In my debugging, I saw that clients favor the order provided that they
support the prior method. For example,
www-authenticate: Digest ...
www-authenticate: Basic ...
If digest is supported, by all three browsers, it is preffered.
Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Maurizio Lota
Scrive Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think using a list/set of TAuthTypes is a cool idea. I am planning
> > in the GUI a checkbox scheme. The most complex one should have the
> > biggest priority (Digest then Basic instead of Basic then Dige
Scrive Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In my debugging, I saw that clients favor the order provided that they
> support the prior method. For example,
>
> www-authenticate: Digest ...
> www-authenticate: Basic ...
>
> If digest is supported, by all three browsers, it is preffered.
Here is a URL that explains the concept under Apache:
http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/sitemanagement/urlrewriting.html
Best Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 12:57 PM
Subject: [
Hi,
Current code doesn't handle keep-alive in the
401 response.
What are the recommended keep-alive headers with
Basic as well as Digest?
M$ IIS sends always Connection: close in the first
401 header.
Currently I do the same.
Any veto?
---
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/o
Well, in our code, unless the client request type is close, we return
keep-alive if it is NOT HTTP/1.0 and 1.1.
Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 4:40 PM
Subject: [twsocket] Webserver
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Well, in our code, unless the client request type is close, we return
> keep-alive if it is NOT HTTP/1.0 and 1.1.
So, are you using your own copy with individual changes?
Default HTTP/1.1 is keep-alive, Default HTTP/1.0 is closing the connection.
I've done the follow
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Webserver AUTH keep-alive
: Fastream Technologies wrote:
: > Well, in our code, unless the client request type is close, we return
:
Hi,
Currently I don't need the old property AuthType at all.
I want to exchange AuthType by AuthTypes. That will make
virtually no problems, code can be updated very easy.
---
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
> Scrive Arno Garrels
Hello,
No, I hadn't seen your answer. Thanks for response once.
Now, I use the asynchronous model, when I send the mail, it executes
this code:
Smtp1.port := 'smtp';
Smtp1.FromName := name;
Smtp1.HdrFrom := mail1;
Smtp1.HdrTo:= destino;
Smtp1.RcptName.add(destino);
Smtp1.Rc
> This is bad design IMO.
OK, changed, at least it works, so I guess it's not wrong.
---
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
- Original Message -
From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, Septemb
Scrive Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Currently I don't need the old property AuthType at all.
> I want to exchange AuthType by AuthTypes. That will make
> virtually no problems, code can be updated very easy.
I try to explain it better.
If you drop the AuthType property (or any
In the end of the day, Windows under no condition reboot without user demand
because of user-mode code.
- Original Message -
From: "Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Need help with TServiceA
Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
> Scrive Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
>> Currently I don't need the old property AuthType at all.
>> I want to exchange AuthType by AuthTypes. That will make
>> virtually no problems, code can be updated very easy.
>
> I try to explain it better.
Scrive Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maurizio Lotauro wrote:
[...]
> > I try to explain it better.
> > If you drop the AuthType property (or any other published one) and an
> > application will recompiled without open the unit that contains the
> > component then you get an error at run ti
Hello,
We are producing javascript from within ICS web server/C++ and wonder if the
following is possible with JS,
- Creating an upload meter for File POSTs with Javascript
- Making multi-socket uploads with different content-ranges (server-side
will be coded by ourselves, we are looking for a so
Hi! I was just reading the press release about the Borland Turbo
products.. just started to download it (it's a lot!) but the Explore
Edition is free (I think even for commercial apps) and I was wondering
if anyone got their hands onto it before me! Any idea if the ICS will
work with it?
In
Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
> Hi! I was just reading the press release about the Borland Turbo
> products.. just started to download it (it's a lot!) but the Explore
> Edition is free (I think even for commercial apps) and I was wondering
> if anyone got their hands onto it before me! Any idea if the
Arno Garrels wrote:
> Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
>
>> Hi! I was just reading the press release about the Borland Turbo
>> products.. just started to download it (it's a lot!) but the Explore
>> Edition is free (I think even for commercial apps) and I was wondering
>> if anyone got their hands ont
I'm really sad for Borland another chance stupidly wasted... who
was the genius that "creates" the "non-extensibility idioturbo model"
Only for programmers that likes to run in a closet
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En
nombre de Maurizio Lotauro
You should, as it is done in the demo MailSnd, display the messages from the
server and also check for errors. Reading the messages and errors, you'll
understand what's going wrong.
--
Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyt
If you think about it, the whole point of having the free version
is to get people interested and get beginners started. Now they have to
create the components by code ... wise decision :) [OT]
> I'm really sad for Borland another chance stupidly wasted... who
> was the genius that "creates"
Scrive Mohit Sindhwani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi! I was just reading the press release about the Borland Turbo
> products.. just started to download it (it's a lot!) but the Explore
> Edition is free (I think even for commercial apps) and I was wondering
> if anyone got their hands onto it bef
> I'm really sad for Borland another chance stupidly wasted... who
> was the genius that "creates" the "non-extensibility idioturbo model"
>
> Only for programmers that likes to run in a closet
There are two Turbo versions: Explorer and Pro.
Explorer is free of charge but can't be extended w
You can create the ICS components at run-time and set properties as
needed. The only thing that usually causes problems is knowing event
signatures.
-Johnnie Norsworthy
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
>> Hi! I was just reading the press release about the Borland Turbo
>> products.. just started to download it (it's a lot!) but the Explore
>> Edition is free (I think even for commercial apps) and I was wondering
>> if anyone got their hands onto it before me! Any idea if the ICS will
>> work wi
Jack wrote:
> If you think about it, the whole point of having the free version
> is to get people interested and get beginners started. Now they have
> to create the components by code ... wise decision :) [OT]
I agree with you. Especially the beginners use to use plenty of
third party components
>> Hi! I was just reading the press release about the Borland Turbo
>> products.. just started to download it (it's a lot!) but the Explore
>> Edition is free (I think even for commercial apps) and I was wondering
>> if anyone got their hands onto it before me! Any idea if the ICS will
>> work wi
That's amazing! An excellent tool for "beginners" that requires a
(somewhat) deep knowledge only to use another set of components!!
Who pays for those marketing guys?? Microsoft?
Don't try the AI until u get ride of the NS!!
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
> That's amazing! An excellent tool for "beginners" that requires a
> (somewhat) deep knowledge only to use another set of components!!
The beginners are not expected to be creating complex applications
needing third party components with the 'free' version, they are
expected to buy Turbo Profe
Dear sir
Beginners DON'T CREATE COMPLEX COMMERCIAL APPS
You need freedom for create not "artificial" restrictions. Another tools
like Trolltech QT have two licenses modes and two 'packages'
But I'm afraid this is becoming a big offtopic so I'm done with it
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL P
I wonder why Overbyte does not give the ICS code to be included in the
standard package?
Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Pablo Harguindey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] [OT] Borland Turbo
: T
>> I'm really sad for Borland another chance stupidly wasted... Who
>> was the genius that "creates" the "non-extensibility idioturbo model"
I totally disagree. This is an awesome *FREE* deal for people who want to
start to develop their own apps, or create "quick-and-dirty" tools. The
c
> I wonder why Overbyte does not give the ICS code to be included in
> the standard package?
Borland will never package ICS in Delphi without proper documentation
and a full and up to date help file, and that's as far off as ever.
It should not even be on the companion disks without documentat
Hi,
I am wondering anybody here can give an example on how to build a password
protected web server using THttpServer.
I tried to setup a basic authentication for THttpServer. But it seems that
HttpServer1AuthGetPassword event always give an empty Password (I use
ShowMessage(Password) in C++ Buil
That is a reference variable parameter! You need to pass the correct
password for the user specified to the component by assigning to the
variable!
Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "xmedia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'ICS support mailing'"
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 8:30 AM
Thanks SZ. But where do I get the password user sent? Do you have any
example? Sorry but I am a bit lost here...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fastream Technologies
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:32 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject
xmedia wrote:
> Thanks SZ. But where do I get the password user sent? Do you have any
> example? Sorry but I am a bit lost here...
Look at the (OverbyteIcs)Websrv demo in latest beta, there are several
events and properties dealing with authentication.
Next version will also include NTLM support.
The error number is always 550. In IIS, it appears a connection but it
doesn't send anything.
Regards.
- Original Message -
From: "Francois PIETTE" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] SMTPClient
> You should,
49 matches
Mail list logo
