Hello!
> I think there's a maximum line length specified in the RFC for SMTP
> transactions, but like any other header, you can add a line break and
> indent the next line to extend the header. So I guess there isn't a
> specific limit for this header.
For references (and large discussions) i
I think there's a maximum line length specified in the RFC for SMTP
transactions, but like any other header, you can add a line break and
indent the next line to extend the header. So I guess there isn't a
specific limit for this header.
Also, apart from the In-Reply-To and References headers,
Hello DZ-Jay,
Aha I get it. So if I wants to be compatible I include both of them,
just as your email reader does.
One more question, is there a max length fur these headers ?
---
Rgds, Wilfried
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 11:07, DZ-Jay wrote:
> The problem is that differ
The problem is that different mailers use different systems, so you
should consider as many as you can. One last thing you must consider
is for those mailers (very common!) who do not even include any
reference to the original, except the subject "Re: origina_subject".
dZ.
On Aug 30,
Hello,
If I want to reply on a mail and I want to have that the receiver of the
reply has the possibility to display in same thread like many mail
readers do, do I have to use the 'References' header or 'In-Reply-To'
header ?
It seems that both are sometime used, eg I see a thread here started
wi
