Ok. I see the point now.
Thanks,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Leech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Writing a transparent HTTP proxy
: Fastream Technologies wrote:
Fastream Technologies wrote:
>Not exactly. No real answer for my actual question...
>
>
I dont think you can support virtual hosts for http 1.0, is this what
you are saying. You could support http 1.0 if you had a public IP per
host if you really needed to.
>
>On 10/4/06, Kris Leech <[EMAIL P
Not exactly. No real answer for my actual question...
On 10/4/06, Kris Leech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, did you find the answer to this?
>
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >I have a few issues left for understanding how a transparent proxy works.
> I
> >talked with a frien
gards,
Anatoly Podgoretsky
- Original Message -
From: "Kris Leech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Writing a transparent HTTP proxy
> Hi, did you find the answer to this
Hi, did you find the answer to this?
Fastream Technologies wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have a few issues left for understanding how a transparent proxy works. I
>talked with a friend in an ISP how they configure them and he said they use
>Layer4 switches to redirect all HTTP port 80 traffic to the proxy
Hello,
I have a few issues left for understanding how a transparent proxy works. I
talked with a friend in an ISP how they configure them and he said they use
Layer4 switches to redirect all HTTP port 80 traffic to the proxy even
though the end user does not configures his browser settings for the
