Le 03/09/2010 23:03, DZ-Jay a écrit :
Fabrice, I do not have Delphi available at this moment, so could you
test the code below to see if it is treated as spam by SpamAssassin?
Hello,
There is a tools to check SpamAssassin score here :
http://www.mailingcheck.com/
Best regards,
-
Fabrice
Le 03/09/2010 23:03, DZ-Jay a écrit :
Fabrice, I do not have Delphi available at this moment, so could you
test the code below to see if it is treated as spam by SpamAssassin?
Hello,
There is a tools to check SpamAssassin score here :
http://www.mailingcheck.com/
Best regards,
--
Fabrice V
On Sep 04, 2010, at 13:14, Arno Garrels wrote:
> DZ-Jay wrote:
>> On Sep 04, 2010, at 11:40, Arno Garrels wrote:
>>
>>> Hello DZ-Jay,
>>>
>>> At least Firebird provides 5 priorities so why should we remove this
>>> feature from ICS?
>>
>> It's not standard, most clients assume there's only "lo
DZ-Jay wrote:
> On Sep 04, 2010, at 11:40, Arno Garrels wrote:
>
>> Hello DZ-Jay,
>>
>> At least Firebird provides 5 priorities so why should we remove this
>> feature from ICS?
>
> It's not standard, most clients assume there's only "low," "normal,"
> and "urgent". In any case, setting TSmtpCl
On Sep 04, 2010, at 11:40, Arno Garrels wrote:
> Hello DZ-Jay,
>
> At least Firebird provides 5 priorities so why should we remove this
> feature from ICS?
It's not standard, most clients assume there's only "low," "normal," and
"urgent". In any case, setting TSmtpCli to use only three values
Arno Garrels wrote:
> Isn't it just the high priority itself, that scores?
Or most likely the existence of the word "Priority", may it be low or
high? But I cannot remember when I saw the last spam mail with a high
priority.
--
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSo
Hello DZ-Jay,
At least Firebird provides 5 priorities so why should we remove this
feature from ICS?
It's likely that X-MSMail-Priority can be removed, however my OE v6
still uses it, XP SP3.
Isn't it just the high priority itself, that scores?
--
Arno Garrels
> On 09/03/2010 15:09, Arno G
er 03, 2010 11:03 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] TSmtpCli and bad spam score
On 09/03/2010 15:09, Arno Garrels wrote:
Does that mean that you or DZ-Jay will check in this change?
I'm currently not up to date with the SMTP RFCs.
But I wonder why "Priority" and "X-MSMail-Priority&qu
On 09/03/2010 15:09, Arno Garrels wrote:
Does that mean that you or DZ-Jay will check in this change?
I'm currently not up to date with the SMTP RFCs.
But I wonder why "Priority" and "X-MSMail-Priority" are no
longer required?
Arno,
I did a little more research (I haven't kept up with these R
Francois PIETTE wrote:
>> I suggest a better solution would be as follows, which more closes
>> adheres to conventions. These values have been empirically
>> >discovered testing with Apple Mail, MS Outlook, and Mozilla
>> Thunderbird. They are also described in various suggested
>> >standards. N
I suggest a better solution would be as follows, which more closes adheres
to conventions. These values have been empirically >discovered testing
with Apple Mail, MS Outlook, and Mozilla Thunderbird. They are also
described in various suggested >standards. Notice that "Normal Priority"
is ty
On Sep 03, 2010, at 06:53, Fabrice Vendé wrote:
> if FHdrPriority < smtpPriorityNormal then begin
>FHdrLines.Add('Priority: urgent');
>FHdrLines.Add('X-MSMail-Priority: High');
>end
>else if FHdrPriority = smtpPriorityNormal then be
Hello,
I have found something which give a very bad spam score in
OverbyteIcsSmtpProt.pas.
Tested with SpamAssassin for example in all version of ICS ans Delphi.
I have found a solution in OverbyteIcsSmtpPro.pas :
Change :
procedure TCustomSmtpClient.Data;
...
if FHdrPriority < s
13 matches
Mail list logo
