Hello Markus,
With so small packets I think you will have them complete most at the
time.
---
Rgds, Wilfried [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Thursday, January 31, 2008, 19:43, Markus Humm wrote:
>> Hello Markus,
>>
>> Fragmentation has nothing
> Hello Markus,
>
> Fragmentation has nothing to do with ICS, it is IP issue and you cannot
> influence it.
Ok, understood. I just thought to have seen a flag somewhere
"don't fragment".
> I think if you send packets smaller than MTU then chance
> is lower that you get fragmentation. Also I thi
Hello Markus,
Fragmentation as other guys said is IP issue and you can do nothing
about it if any device between sender and receiver's machines cannot
bring packet the same size they have been sent from source.
IP protocol has come message system to ask for sender to resend packet
as fragmented
Hello Markus,
Fragmentation has nothing to do with ICS, it is IP issue and you cannot
influence it. I think if you send packets smaller than MTU then chance
is lower that you get fragmentation. Also I think on a busy network
chance is higher. But what is the problem? Wy take the risk? Just
concate
> So what about TCP fragmentation now? How often does it occur in this
> situation? Is it less likely to occur on a lan than on some internet
> connection? Can I influence it in any way?
IMO fragmentation is an IP issue, not an UDP nor TCP issue.
IP is the protocol below both TCP and UDP.
--
[E
Hello,
since the device I want to talk to does only support sending back the
UDP answerts to a predefined IP thus requiring a fixed IP adress on PC
side I have to experiment with TCP now.
I originally used UDP because it's fragmentation free because behind the
device I'm talking to sits anothe
