Re: [twsocket] Re Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822

2006-07-19 Thread Arno Garrels
DZ-Jay wrote: > On Jul 19, 2006, at 03:52, Arno Garrels wrote: > >> kaythorn wrote: > Is there something I can do to pacify X-Spam? Remove that space (the one between Roland and Couvela). >>> >>> Shall we modify function GenerateMessageID? Something like: >>> > > I don't think we

Re: [twsocket] Re Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822

2006-07-19 Thread DZ-Jay
On Jul 19, 2006, at 03:52, Arno Garrels wrote: > kaythorn wrote: Is there something I can do to pacify X-Spam? >>> >>> Remove that space (the one between Roland and Couvela). >> >> Shall we modify function GenerateMessageID? Something like: >> I don't think we should modify the function. X

Re: [twsocket] Re Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822

2006-07-19 Thread Arno Garrels
kaythorn wrote: >>> Is there something I can do to pacify X-Spam? >> >> Remove that space (the one between Roland and Couvela). > > Shall we modify function GenerateMessageID? Something like: > > > .but wouldn't it be simpler to use SignOn if it exists, then it > would be under the control

[twsocket] Re Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822

2006-07-18 Thread kaythorn
>> Is there something I can do to pacify X-Spam? > > Remove that space (the one between Roland and Couvela). Shall we modify function GenerateMessageID? Something like: .but wouldn't it be simpler to use SignOn if it exists, then it would be under the control of the application and also ma