S support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Proposal for new feature in OverbyteIcsSmtpProt.pas
Bjørnar Nielsen wrote:
> I did not know of this header-field.
>
> Why not add properties for both? The xautogeneratedreply works for my purpose
> and the mailservers I have testet agains
Bjørnar Nielsen wrote:
> I did not know of this header-field.
>
> Why not add properties for both? The xautogeneratedreply works for my purpose
> and the mailservers I have testet against.
>
> Regards Bjørnar
Well, because delivery loops are a server problem, and a mail user agent
not only sho
:07
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Proposal for new feature in OverbyteIcsSmtpProt.pas
Hello:
I don't think this is necessary. First, this headers should be
handled by the application (and indeed can easily be done as you
pointed out). Second, there is a convention
Hello:
I don't think this is necessary. First, this headers should be
handled by the application (and indeed can easily be done as you
pointed out). Second, there is a conventional "X-Loop" header used and
supported by many MTAs.
http://www.ninebynine.org/IETF/Messaging/draft-klyne
New property:
property XAutoGeneratedReply : Boolean read FXAutoGeneratedReply
{Bjørnar}
write FXAutoGeneratedReply; {Bjørnar}
The reason for using this is to tell the receiving mailserver tha
