Re: [twsocket] New ICS-V6andICS-SSL-V6 availableBCBCOMPATIBILITYWARNING

2007-06-27 Thread Fastream Technologies
pport mailing" Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] New ICS-V6andICS-SSL-V6 availableBCBCOMPATIBILITYWARNING > Ok, I tried to rename and what's even stranger is no unit compile > complained! > > For instance, Sendto: > > function WSocket_Sy

Re: [twsocket] New ICS-V6andICS-SSL-V6 availableBCBCOMPATIBILITYWARNING

2007-06-27 Thread Fastream Technologies
From: "Fastream Technologies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 2:49 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] New ICS-V6andICS-SSL-V6 availableBCBCOMPATIBILITYWARNING >I wonder how would Delphi guys evaluate the correctness of the below in &

Re: [twsocket] New ICS-V6andICS-SSL-V6 availableBCBCOMPATIBILITYWARNING

2007-06-27 Thread Fastream Technologies
ielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'ICS support mailing'" Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 9:46 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] New ICS-V6andICS-SSL-V6 availableBCBCOMPATIBILITYWARNING Now I'm not sure if I had to call send directly. But I had a derived class and I set the c

Re: [twsocket] New ICS-V6andICS-SSL-V6 availableBCBCOMPATIBILITYWARNING

2007-06-26 Thread Veit Zimmermann
Hello Faststream Technologies Excuse me, but this is becoming a little bit annoying. Could you please shorten the quotation of your messages? I mean, is it really necessary to quote 300 lines for only line of text: Fastream Technologies wrote: > I am now 100% sure it is a ICSv6 vs. BCB issue. >

Re: [twsocket] New ICS-V6andICS-SSL-V6 availableBCBCOMPATIBILITYWARNING

2007-06-26 Thread Fastream Technologies
I am now 100% sure it is a ICSv6 vs. BCB issue. - Original Message - From: "Bjørnar Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'ICS support mailing'" Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 9:46 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] New ICS-V6andICS-SSL-V6 availableBCBCOMPATIBILIT