Hello!
>> I wrote a write-buffering stream. Anyone interested? Adding read and seek
>> support and extending it so it can write to other streams shouldn't be
>> difficult.
>>
> I thought windows buffered writes anyway? Is this so you can have a
> larger
> buffer or something completely different
- Original Message -
From: "Piotr Dalek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FTPClient speeds
> Hello!
>
> I wrote a write-buffering stream. Anyone interested? Adding read
Hello!
>> I could but...don't remember where is my stop-time watch I just bought
>> around the corner to make it pause life-time for next 10 years :-)
> However, most high level components would benefit from such a buffered
> stream,
> highly efficient, and don't forget "I am programming, therefo
Dod wrote:
> Hello Arno,
>
> I could but...don't remember where is my stop-time watch I just bought
> around the corner to make it pause life-time for next 10 years :-)
However, most high level components would benefit from such a buffered stream,
highly efficient, and don't forget "I am programm
Hello Arno,
I could but...don't remember where is my stop-time watch I just bought
around the corner to make it pause life-time for next 10 years :-)
AG> Dod wrote:
>> Also remember that if you use xDSL connection your upload bandwidth
>> much smaller than download one.
AG> Yes I know, I was
Dod wrote:
> Also remember that if you use xDSL connection your upload bandwidth
> much smaller than download one.
Yes I know, I was just wondering whether file caching can make such a big
difference.
BTW: I already suggested last year to write/implement a tiny buffered stream
class, that woul
Also remember that if you use xDSL connection your upload bandwidth
much smaller than download one.
>> Is GET faster than PUT?
>> In my tests GET performs seven times faster than PUT.
FP> Considering the transport, there is no reason to have a speed difference.
>> Server caches files, is that
> Is GET faster than PUT?
> In my tests GET performs seven times faster than PUT.
> Server caches files, is that the reason?
Yes, reading a file will always be much faster than writing one,
particularly on a heavily loaded web server where much of the content
is coming from memory, and stuff is
> Is GET faster than PUT?
> In my tests GET performs seven times faster than PUT.
Considering the transport, there is no reason to have a speed difference.
> Server caches files, is that the reason?
That helps have high performance.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
--
To unsubscribe
Is GET faster than PUT?
In my tests GET performs seven times faster than PUT.
Server caches files, is that the reason?
Arno Garrels
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overb
10 matches
Mail list logo
