> I may well have some more questions soon on another little project
> based on the Overbyte FTP Server demo program.
Just make sure you start with the V7 FTP server this time, there are
numerous improvements and new commands over V5 and V6. I run in on my
public web site: ftp://www.magsys.co.uk
4
To: twsocket@elists.org
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client
> When I get the FEAT response, where do I look for the results?
The results are parsed by the component into numerous ftpFeatxxx types so
applications know whether specific features are supported.
You
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client
Graham Powell wrote:
> When I get the FEAT response, where do I look for the results?
> Although I think this is irrelevant since I have found the spec for
> the server and the only FEAT supporte
> BTW: I think the OverbyteIcsFtpTst demo doesn't set
> the UTF-8 code page correctly. Some weeks ago I read
> in an FTP-RFC (cannot recall the number) that if the
> UTF-8 Feat is returned by the server and an OPTS
> UTF8 ON command failed it has to be assumed that UTF-8
> is already active on t
> When I get the FEAT response, where do I look for the results?
The results are parsed by the component into numerous ftpFeatxxx types so
applications know whether specific features are supported.
You need to log LastResponse to see them all as literals, but I'm sure
your program does that for
ems Ltd
> Sent: 08 March 2010 14:17
> To: twsocket@elists.org
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client
>
>> I thought strings were dynamic. The string was always cleared before
>> each FTP command.
>
> Strings are dynamic, but TWSocket re
] On
Behalf Of Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
Sent: 08 March 2010 14:17
To: twsocket@elists.org
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client
> I thought strings were dynamic. The string was always cleared before
> each FTP command.
Strings are dynamic, but TW
> I thought strings were dynamic. The string was always cleared
> before each FTP command.
Strings are dynamic, but TWSocket returns buffers not strings, and you
normally use MOVE to fill a string, which means increasing the size
manually.
> I shall investigate your MLST idea.
Can you post th
ocket-boun...@elists.org [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On
Behalf Of Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
Sent: 05 March 2010 11:11
To: twsocket@elists.org
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client
> I also mentioned previously that I have modified the FTP Client to
&g
e FTP client in Vancouver.
Graham
-Original Message-
From: twsocket-boun...@elists.org [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On
Behalf Of Arno Garrels
Sent: 06 March 2010 19:36
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client
Graham Powell wrote:
Graham Powell wrote:
> The directory listing contains a list of story identifiers which look
> something like this 123454678:12345678:12345678
> The date and time of the story is one of the fields. So the listing
> gives me the stories I need to download and the timestamp. When a
> story changes I
disappears from the list I delete it.
Regards
Graham
-Original Message-
From: twsocket-boun...@elists.org [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On
Behalf Of Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
Sent: 05 March 2010 11:40
To: twsocket@elists.org
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte
> As I have mentioned in previous posts some months ago I am
> interfacing to an Avid iNEWS newsroom server and polling by using
> the dirAsync command sent every 3 seconds.
Are you checking for changes to a specific file, or just looking for new
files in general? If the former, using the MLST o
> I also mentioned previously that I have modified the FTP Client to
> download to a String rather than a file or a Stream.
Unless you create a string that is hundreds of thousands of bytes long,
or continually extend it each time it's written, you risk overflowing a
string since they are not in
egards
Graham
-Original Message-
From: twsocket-boun...@elists.org [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On
Behalf Of Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd
Sent: 04 March 2010 10:31
To: twsocket@elists.org
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FPiette V2.108 vs Overbyte V7.07 - FTP Client
> Every time I up
Every time I upgrade from the old FPiette software to any of the Overbyte
versions
So my question to anybody in the know is this: Is there any fundamental
difference in the way these two FTPClient components work?
These are basically the same components. What you name "Overbyte versions"
is
> Every time I upgrade from the old FPiette software to any of the
> Overbyte versions I have been experiencing the occasional problem.
What problem? You need to supply detailed logs showing the specific
component versions being used, commands sent and received and the errors.
> the applicatio
Every time I upgrade from the old FPiette software to any of the Overbyte
versions I have been experiencing the occasional problem. I cannot reproduce
the problem in the office, but customers report odd effects. Each time the
finger starts to point to the FTP component. Bear in mind that the custom
18 matches
Mail list logo
