Francois PIETTE wrote:
>> I think I got it, please try:
>>
>> procedure TIcsBufferHandler.DeleteAllData;
>> var
>> Buf : TIcsBuffer;
>> begin
>> Buf := FInUseList.RemoveFromListHead;
>> while Assigned(Buf) do begin
>> add =>Buf.WrCount := 0;
>> add =>Buf.RdCount := 0;
>
> I think I got it, please try:
>
> procedure TIcsBufferHandler.DeleteAllData;
> var
> Buf : TIcsBuffer;
> begin
> Buf := FInUseList.RemoveFromListHead;
> while Assigned(Buf) do begin
> add =>Buf.WrCount := 0;
> add =>Buf.RdCount := 0;
> FFreeList.AddToListHead(B
Yes sir, you really got it! :)
Thanks!
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug report for TFTPServer
:I think I got it,
]
>> http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
>>
>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "ICS support mailing"
>>> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 10:1
gt; ---
> Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
> http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
>
>
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "ICS support mailing"
> > Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 10:18 PM
ICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing"
> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 10:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug report for TFTPServer
>
Yes. I tried with a 2-years-old version.
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug report for TFTPServer
: Fastream Technologies wrote:
: > Wh
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> What about the PASV ports being mixed up? Could this be possible? The
> ICS code for old versions prior to manual passive ports -seemed to-
> work fine here!
Please check that out. Are such older ICS versions realy working fine?
Thanks
---
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
ht
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> It is best observed with file sizes > 100kb. Do you agree?
I do not know, my test files were 3.750 KB.
The file offset seemes to be set correctly in ClientRetrSessionConnected,
CuteFTP seems to create a temp-file for each part and merges them later.
In some of those
What about the PASV ports being mixed up? Could this be possible? The
ICS code for old versions prior to manual passive ports -seemed to-
work fine here!
Regards,
SZ
On 10/22/06, Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > It is best observed with file sizes > 100k
upport mailing"
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug report for TFTPServer
: Fastream Technologies wrote:
: > What comes to my mind: since it only occurs with non-first files and
: > with at least 4 connections per file, I believe there is something
It is best observed with file sizes > 100kb. Do you agree?
Regards,
SZ
On 10/21/06, Arno Garrels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > What comes to my mind: since it only occurs with non-first files and
> > with at least 4 connections per file, I believe there is somethi
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> What comes to my mind: since it only occurs with non-first files and
> with at least 4 connections per file, I believe there is something
> wrong with the state-machine.
That's not true it happens as well with two files and even sometimes
the first file gets corrupte
What comes to my mind: since it only occurs with non-first files and
with at least 4 connections per file, I believe there is something
wrong with the state-machine. It simply loses its state after the
first request is complete and second is started. Also the problem
occurs in the non-first connect
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Anyway, the problem PERSISTS on your code as well! Please download
> the trial CuteFTP Pro and see.
That's true, only I cannot find anything buggy in the ICS FTP Server.
When you select Multi-Part Download (Max n parts) Cute FTP connects
n clients. Each client star
Saturday, October 21, 2006 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug report for TFTPServer
: Fastream Technologies wrote:
: > I,
: >
: > - back up'ed
: > - overwrote the files in VC32
: > - it gave compiler errors in SSL code! (ftpImplicitSSL not defined!)
:
: There was a simple t
.
>
> Could you privately send me the SSL code as well? We are contributors
> to SSL project.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> SZ
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "ICS support mailing&quo
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Bug report for TFTPServer
: Fastream Technologies wrote:
: > TFtpServer REST/PASV is simply unreliable.
:
: Please try: http://www.duodata.de/misc/delphi/new-ics6-2006092
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> TFtpServer REST/PASV is simply unreliable.
Please try: http://www.duodata.de/misc/delphi/new-ics6-20060920.zip
This is still unofficial, make a backup first before you overwrite
your old files, read the comment sections, rebuild your package.
Does it solve the prob
Hello,
- Compile the latest FTP Server demo
- w/o SSL and compression, do this:
- download CuteFTP Pro 8.0 from www.cuteftp.com
- place at least 5 jpgs to c:\Temp
- Use the CuteFTP Pro's Multi-part downloads with at least 4 parts (MAX--as
it is called in CuteFTP)
- You will see that the first -fe
20 matches
Mail list logo
