Re: [twsocket] Project proposal

2007-05-10 Thread Marco van de Voort
(Old msg, Francois dd 27-02-2007, just some simple IMH(O) opinions) > In my opinion, you will just sell nothing in the Linux world. (nobody said you have to) > Linux users wants free software (Not all users I sell Linux to are linux users) > That's the main problem. Do not start any > invest

Re: [twsocket] ICS on Lazarus

2007-02-27 Thread Marco van de Voort
> > does ICS work on Lazarus under Linux yet? > > I have no idea as I don't use Lazarus. But I made all the changes suggested > by Lazarus community to have ICS code compatible with it. Marco van de Voort > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is an active ICS user in that area. I&#x

Re: [twsocket] OnClientDisconnect on Linux

2006-12-30 Thread Marco van de Voort
(_very_ old msg, I played with a snapshot, thought I'd drop a mail about it, and then read the backlog of msgs on this list) > Does ICS work with FPC (Free Pascal Compiler) it is free and compiles to > Linux and Windows (plus others)? FPC also has a Delphi compatibility > mode so it will also c

Re: [twsocket] ICS-V6 supported compilers

2005-12-30 Thread Marco van de Voort
> > I prefer use Delphi 6 instead Delphi 7 but I think it should > > theorically work without changes isn't it ? > > With the current code, it would probably work with all 32 bit compilers > (Delphi 2 and up). But for making the code work with .NET without too much > conditional compil

Re: [twsocket] ICS and Free Pascal

2005-12-19 Thread Marco van de Voort
> So, console programs should compile. This is what I'm interested in. I will > give it a try. Where are the patches u mentioned? Already integrated in ICS since mid 2004 -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsock

Re: [twsocket] ICS and Free Pascal

2005-12-13 Thread Marco van de Voort
> > Is anyone have succesfully using ICS with FPC? I would like to write > > some programs in FP and as i am an ICS addicted user ... > > I never tested with FP, but Marco van de Voort ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) sent me some changes to make it compatible a

Re: Re[2]: [twsocket] Multithreaded http...

2005-04-17 Thread Marco van de Voort
> you are ritght because working with float is more CPU. But GetTickCount > roll over every 49 day... So without extra code the timeout can fail if > it is (by Murphy's law) just on the particular moment.. One can still use gettickcount then. One only has to combine it with your technique to keep

Re: Re[6]: [twsocket] NOFORMS and TWSocketServer

2005-04-15 Thread Marco van de Voort
[quoting fixed] > MvdV> . > MvdV> wsocketS imports unit controls without using it (or is it for the > USE_SSL?) > MvdV> anyway, it should be under IFDEF NOFORMS or USE_SSL or both. > MvdV> ... > MvdV> So simply putting controls under no_forms would probably fix it in an > older > Mv

Re: Re[4]: [twsocket] NOFORMS and TWSocketServer

2005-04-14 Thread Marco van de Voort
> > Only used. I even deleted all ICS dcu files. > > I created a new console mode application (D7), added NOFORMS in the project > defines. > Compilation gives a filesize: 39.424 Bytes. > Added WSocket to the uses clause: 91.136 Bytes. > Added WSocketS to the uses clause: 91.648 Bytes. > Removed

Re: Re[2]: [twsocket] udp broadcast on all interfaces?

2005-04-06 Thread Marco van de Voort
> No -1 is refused by most (if not all) routers. Normal because you then > could do a broadcase along _all_ IP around the world.. Yup, just tested this. I had made a few console versions of the UDP demoes, and couldn't get it working over localhost. I then later found out that the GUI demoes didn'

[twsocket] FPC status

2005-03-14 Thread Marco van de Voort
Hello, as probably noticed in Francois comments in new release announcements, there has been some movement on FPC compability in ICS recently. The con* demoes of the ICS distribution now compile unmodified on a standard FPC 1.9.8 - win32 install. Some GUI success was also reported, but that r