Markus Humm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> afaik pointers are still present in next gen compiler but shouldn't be
> used as liberately as in the past. Only use them when necessary for
> certain APIs etc.
>
> But where do you have this information from?
It's my guess from current XE3 source code. Take a loo
Hello,
afaik pointers are still present in next gen compiler but shouldn't be
used as liberately as in the past. Only use them when necessary for
certain APIs etc.
But where do you have this information from?
Greetings
Markus
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
p
This is where things like Eureka Log come in very handy.
(or various other Exception Handlers)
Matt
-Original Message-
From: twsocket-boun...@elists.org [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On
Behalf Of RTT
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 12:14 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [tw
On 22-10-2012 19:04, LeNif wrote:
My problem is when I disconnect the socket and I immediately reconnects, I get
an error EStackOverflow
And if the reconnect is not "immediately" (you wait more time), the
error does not occur?
Have you checked the stack trace, in that stack overflow condition
> I would take a look as lazarus 1.x could handle ICS no problem.
You are welcome to try ICS with lazarus and make the changes required to
support Lazarus. If you do, please be sure to start with ICS-V8, the latest
version and take the source code directly out of the SVN repository.
--
francois
> I already try, after reading the Wiki, the Shutdown(1) procedure, anyway, the
> result is the same. I try close, shutdown, abort ... etc.
Make a stripped down version of your application and mail it to me. Be sure to
include a complete project with only the code required to reproduce the error
What about lazarus? It's pretty darn good and has pointers. I am moving
all the projects I can to lazarus.
The more third party support it gets the better. I would take a look as
lazarus 1.x could handle ICS no problem.
On Oct 25, 2012 12:14 AM, "Arno Garrels" wrote:
> Hoby Smith wrote:
>
> > N