zayin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks Arno. The speed increase was almost double.
>
>> Please let me know how it works for you, does it slow down
> performance when you have plenty of small files to transfer?
>
> Not sure. The files I am sending, normally just two, are all large
> installer files.
>
Hello!
> I have a couple clients now that have upgraded to Verizon "4G" and now
> the functions that use the ICS components don't work anymore for them,
> I'm guessing it's FTP upload but don't have any details on what the
> failure is. Just wondered if anyone had experienced this? From what
Hello,
Thanks Arno. The speed increase was almost double.
> Please let me know how it works for you, does it slow down
performance when you have plenty of small files to transfer?
Not sure. The files I am sending, normally just two, are all large installer
files.
> Maybe we should make these s
Arno Garrels wrote:
>
> My test: ICS 7.3 MB/s and FileZilla 12.0 MB/s in a 100 Mbit LAN.
> After I set DataSocket's winsock send and receive buffer size
> to 32768 (default 8192) speed notably increased to 11.4.
The receive buffer doesn't matter here of course :)
> I uploaded this changed Overb
Arno Garrels wrote:
> After I set DataSocket's winsock send and receive buffer size
> to 32768 (default 8192) speed notably increased to 11.4.
The reason for this increase is that TryToSent less often
hits socket error WSAWOULDBLOCK see also:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823764/en-us
--
Ar
zayin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using TFtpClient, version 7.12 to transfer a single file. The
> elapsed time is over 4 1/2 minutes. When I transfer the same single
> file with FileZilla the elapsed time is 2 1/2 minutes.
My test: ICS 7.3 MB/s and FileZilla 12.0 MB/s in a 100 Mbit LAN.
After I set
