My apologies for the continued rant, but I had another thought to share. ;)
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:31 PM, DZ-Jay wrote:
> Since a new compiler is an absolute unknown factor, it cannot be assumed to
> be supported by default.
If the only objection to using CompilerVersion is to avoid implying
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Olivier Sannier wrote:
> Yeah, that's the problem I have. Maybe it's humor for the "compile then
> ship" part,
It was humor. I was trying to make the point that just because
something compiles does not mean it is ready to ship. I never meant
to imply that adding
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:31 PM, DZ-Jay wrote:
>
> It can never be known in advance what new features will be added or which old
> features may be deprecated by a new version of a compiler; and whether any of
> it will break existing code or not.
Of course not.
> ICS, like many other components
On 05/09/2010 23:22, Jon Robertson wrote:
But then again, you must know what you are talking about...
Wow. I'm surprised by the hostility.
Sorry, bad day, you're the last one on the long list of weird remarks to
day...
Based on your JVCL experience, are you aware of anything that should
be
> But then again, you must know what you are talking about...
Wow. I'm surprised by the hostility.
Based on your JVCL experience, are you aware of anything that should
be reviewed in ICS for XE support?
Isn't JVCL is a little more dependent on the core VCL components than
ICS is? For the most
On Sep 05, 2010, at 15:06, Jon Robertson wrote:
> If ICS works in D2010, why can't the same source be recompiled in
> Delphi XE without change? Why must component vendors insist on
> forcing source code changes (even if just the .inc file) for every
> version, when there is very likely nothing i
On 05/09/2010 21:06, Jon Robertson wrote:
If ICS works in D2010, why can't the same source be recompiled in
Delphi XE without change? Why must component vendors insist on
forcing source code changes (even if just the .inc file) for every
version, when there is very likely nothing in the new ver
> Which problem do you have exactly ?
> I never had any complain about Delphi version detection.
If nothing else:
If no VER defines are detected, then assume the latest. Which, in
this particular case, would be VER210.
Even better:
Use {$IF CompilerVersion >= } conditionals to determine Delphi
If ICS works in D2010, why can't the same source be recompiled in
Delphi XE without change? Why must component vendors insist on
forcing source code changes (even if just the .inc file) for every
version, when there is very likely nothing in the new version of
Delphi that will break the components
So, while installing my copy of ICS (currently used in D2009 and
D2010) in Delphi XE, the compile dies on:
{$IFNDEF COMPILER7_UP}
Bomb('This component requires Delphi 7 or later');
{$ENDIF}
Why can't component vendors use more reliable means of detecting
versions of Delphi?
Which problem d
So, while installing my copy of ICS (currently used in D2009 and
D2010) in Delphi XE, the compile dies on:
{$IFNDEF COMPILER7_UP}
Bomb('This component requires Delphi 7 or later');
{$ENDIF}
Which reminds me of one of my pet peeves regarding third-party
components and Delphi upgrades:
Why can'
Hi,
I just checked in revision #586.
Log: Fixed a bug in the experimental throttle and timeout source which made
it impossible to use both features at the same time (EListError).
Renamed conditionals EXPERIMENTAL_THROTTLE and EXPERIMENTAL_TIMEOUT to
BUILTIN_THROTTLE and BUILTIN_TIMEOUT. It's now
Le 03/09/2010 23:03, DZ-Jay a écrit :
Fabrice, I do not have Delphi available at this moment, so could you
test the code below to see if it is treated as spam by SpamAssassin?
Hello,
There is a tools to check SpamAssassin score here :
http://www.mailingcheck.com/
Best regards,
-
Fabrice
Le 03/09/2010 23:03, DZ-Jay a écrit :
Fabrice, I do not have Delphi available at this moment, so could you
test the code below to see if it is treated as spam by SpamAssassin?
Hello,
There is a tools to check SpamAssassin score here :
http://www.mailingcheck.com/
Best regards,
--
Fabrice V
14 matches
Mail list logo
