How fast/slow this implementation works with thousands of
concurrent requests is of course untested. One DNS lookup may
take one or even multiple seconds in the worst case.
Shouldn't TWSocket have his own internal cache for DNS lookup ? Or maybe
instead of more complex TWSocket, maybe a compone
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Arno Garrels
> wrote:
>
>> Arno Garrels wrote:
>>> Fastream Technologies wrote:
Hello,
Has the IPv6 async DNS resolving issue been resolved? How
many socket/threads?
>>>
>>> There is a (hopefully) thread-safe ne
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Arno Garrels wrote:
> Arno Garrels wrote:
> > Fastream Technologies wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Has the IPv6 async DNS resolving issue been resolved? How
> >> many socket/threads?
> >
> > There is a (hopefully) thread-safe new class which provides
> > async lookup
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Arno Garrels wrote:
> Arno Garrels wrote:
> > Fastream Technologies wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Has the IPv6 async DNS resolving issue been resolved? How
> >> many socket/threads?
> >
> > There is a (hopefully) thread-safe new class which provides
> > asyn
Arno Garrels wrote:
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Has the IPv6 async DNS resolving issue been resolved? How
>> many socket/threads?
>
> There is a (hopefully) thread-safe new class which provides
> async lookups. One global object of this class is allocated in
> unit initializati
Yes of course but there is no NEW development going on for those systems
as it makes no sense. In other words when it comes time to replace the
hardware they are forced into upgrading the programs or run them in a
virtual environment.
>>I suspect that data comes from querying browser an or or MS
I suspect that data comes from querying browser an or or MS update
users.
There is still a *Huge* W2k installed base in industry, all those
machines and systems with it embedded. Heck, there are still many
DOS+Win3x based systems still running things in places. I even know of
one Comodor PET sti
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has the IPv6 async DNS resolving issue been resolved? How
> many socket/threads?
There is a (hopefully) thread-safe new class which provides
async lookups. One global object of this class is allocated in
unit initialization with the maximum number of thr
Hello,
Has the IPv6 async DNS resolving issue been resolved? How
many socket/threads?
Best Regards,
SZ
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Arno Garrels wrote:
> Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
> >> FTP also still not supporting IPv6
> >
> > FTP needs the EPRT and EPSV commands to su
