Hello Mark,
When you call connect the function returns immediatily, but the
connection happens in background. So it is normal there is memory
allocated. Needed memory is not nececarely a leak.
---
Rgds, Wilfried [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html
http://www.mestdagh.biz
S
Dear List:
I am trying to set up an smtp client embedded within a c++builder program I
am writing. I am not sure what to fill in several properties
Username: the full name with domain or just the name, i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
just jon
Send mode: not sure what mode to use
Share
Hello,
tcpPort: TWSocket;
tcpPort.Connect
AQTime is reporting a memory leak after I call connect.
Has anyone run into this issue?
D2007 SP3 XP Pro SP3
5.25 is in the WSocket file.
Ciao,
Mark
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.eli
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
>> Can you reproduce those errors in a simple environment that uses
>> plain TCP/IP connections? Later today I will try as well.
>
> No, I can not reproduce any passive problems locally with a server on
> my development PC, or my local Windows 2000 serv
> Can you reproduce those errors in a simple environment that uses
> plain TCP/IP connections? Later today I will try as well.
No, I can not reproduce any passive problems locally with a server on my
development PC, or my local Windows 2000 server, or by accessing the
offending FTP server over th
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
>> I guess that won't make a difference, since if a port were
>> still in use an exception in Listen/Bind should be raised
>> and CommandPASV() should return the error.
>
> There is a table in the server which keeps track of which passive
> ports are in
> I guess that won't make a difference, since if a port were
> still in use an exception in Listen/Bind should be raised
> and CommandPASV() should return the error.
There is a table in the server which keeps track of which passive ports
are in use, although it won't help if another application i
Angus Robertson - Magenta Systems Ltd wrote:
> Is there any reason why I should not change it to
> use incrementing ports within the passive pool range?
I guess that won't make a difference, since if a port were
still in use an exception in Listen/Bind should be raised
and CommandPASV() should ret
> For some reason, the passive port pool does not allocate
> sequential port numbers, but continually re-allocates the same
> numbers
My client application swaps between two FTP servers when errors occur.
The second server is still IIS/5 and the logs show that passive ports are
always incrementin
> Is this the original ICS FTP server component with your latest
> changes?
Yes, not the socket server versions, and I'm not made any changes to
passive mode, ports or data connections, except the data source.
Angus
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please go
10 matches
Mail list logo
