Re: [twsocket] Keeping a Responsive UI during THTTPCli Download

2007-11-11 Thread Robert Chafer
If it is asynchronous ... isn't a UI that responds the default? On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 09:25:31 -0800, you wrote: > I have a simple program that downloads a large file using the HTTP Client. > How would one keep the user interface responsive during a long asynchronous > download? > > I have tr

Re: [twsocket] Keeping a Responsive UI during THTTPCli Download

2007-11-11 Thread Francois PIETTE
>I have a simple program that downloads a large file using the HTTP Client. > How would one keep the user interface responsive during a long > asynchronous > download? > > I have tried a number of things and finally ended up adding a timer with > an > Application.ProcessMessages in it. Is there a

[twsocket] Keeping a Responsive UI during THTTPCli Download

2007-11-11 Thread Johnnie Norsworthy
I have a simple program that downloads a large file using the HTTP Client. How would one keep the user interface responsive during a long asynchronous download? I have tried a number of things and finally ended up adding a timer with an Application.ProcessMessages in it. Is there a better way to k

Re: [twsocket] How should an ICS web server treat this?

2007-11-11 Thread DZ-Jay
On Nov 11, 2007, at 11:24, Fastream Technologies wrote: > Ok. We have a URL rewrite part in our IQ reverse proxy ( > http://www.fastream.com/iqreverseproxy.php) but not for the web > server. Just > wondered if there was an easier way to do it. Maybe like Francois suggested: to extract meaning a

Re: [twsocket] How should an ICS web server treat this?

2007-11-11 Thread Fastream Technologies
Ok. We have a URL rewrite part in our IQ reverse proxy ( http://www.fastream.com/iqreverseproxy.php) but not for the web server. Just wondered if there was an easier way to do it. Regards, SZ On 11/11/07, DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 11, 2007, at 08:45, Fastream Technologies w

Re: [twsocket] How should an ICS web server treat this?

2007-11-11 Thread DZ-Jay
On Nov 11, 2007, at 08:45, Fastream Technologies wrote: > Sometimes I see URLs in CGI standard such as, > > < > http://www.opengl.allanpetersen.com/index.php/contents/Main/ > Programming/OpenGL.html EBF20EF23330}mid://0030/!x-usc:http:// > www.opengl.allanpetersen.com/index.php/contents/Mai

Re: [twsocket] How should an ICS web server treat this?

2007-11-11 Thread Francois PIETTE
> What if the system is generic and there is hundreds of folders and .php's? That is only a matter of information organization and search algorithm. There are plenty of technics to speed up searches. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The author of the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare The author of the

Re: [twsocket] How should an ICS web server treat this?

2007-11-11 Thread Fastream Technologies
What if the system is generic and there is hundreds of folders and .php's? Regards, SZ On 11/11/07, Francois PIETTE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sometimes I see URLs in CGI standard such as, > > > http://www.opengl.allanpetersen.com/index.php/contents/Main/Programming/OpenGL.html > > That h

Re: [twsocket] How should an ICS web server treat this?

2007-11-11 Thread Francois PIETTE
> Sometimes I see URLs in CGI standard such as, > http://www.opengl.allanpetersen.com/index.php/contents/Main/Programming/OpenGL.html > That has no "?" for parameters and instead params are listed after > index.php. > How should we parse the file name out of it? I have applications working with s

[twsocket] How should an ICS web server treat this?

2007-11-11 Thread Fastream Technologies
Hello, Sometimes I see URLs in CGI standard such as, < http://www.opengl.allanpetersen.com/index.php/contents/Main/Programming/OpenGL.htmlhttp://www.opengl.allanpetersen.com/index.php/contents/Main/Programming/OpenGL.html> > That has no "?" for parameters and instead params are listed after index

Re: [twsocket] OT - connecting 2 LAN's thru internet gateway

2007-11-11 Thread Francois PIETTE
>>> connecting 2 LAN's thru internet gateway >>> Is this possible ? >> >> Of course :-) >> >>> An idea's ? >> >> Unless I don't correctly understand what you need, it is simply a pair of >> routers having a VPN type connection between. This would be at layer 3 >> (IP). >> >> A remote bridge would a