[twsocket] TWSocketThrdServer - Bogus OnDataAvailable triggered when Closed.

Hello: I'm using TWSocketThrdServer and processing client data from within the OnDataAvailable event handler (client is set to LineMode=True). I've noticed that if the data transaction is completed and I call Client.Close from within this event, the event is called again with the previous Rece

Re: [twsocket] New ICS-V6 beta available - updated for RAD Studio 2007

You're welcome. But is there a change log somewhere? I wonder if we should upgrade even though we have applied the changes that has been published on the list. Best Regards, SubZero On 10/2/07, Francois PIETTE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There is a new ICS-V6 beta available. Updated for RAD

[twsocket] New ICS-V6 beta available - updated for RAD Studio 2007

There is a new ICS-V6 beta available. Updated for RAD Studio 2007. Still OK for Delphi 7. Thanks to Arno Garrels, Bjornar Nielsen, Fastream and many orthers for their help. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The author of the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare The author of the freeware Internet Component

[twsocket] Nested mail command?

Hi First of all thanks Francois for Wonderful ICS comps. -- I receiving a "NESTED MAIL COMAND" message when trying to send mail. Send stop and connection is closed. Everyone can help me about what causes this error? This is a error? Thanks. []s Mac

Re: [twsocket] Using SourceForge for ICS ?

SVN gets my vote. Darin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Francois PIETTE Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 12:55 PM To: twsocket@elists.org Subject: [twsocket] Using SourceForge for ICS ? Hello Guys ! I'm considering the option of pushing I

Re: [twsocket] Using SourceForge for ICS ?

Francois PIETTE wrote: > Hello Guys ! > > I'm considering the option of pushing ICS to SourceForge and I would like to > have your opinion. > That would be most excellent for me. > Does someone already have a real experience of SourceForge as a developper ? > Does the JVCL count as an exper

Re: [twsocket] Using SourceForge for ICS ?

Hello: I've used SourceForge before, and it is a nice environment for distribution and project sharing and participation. I will suggest you use SubVersion (SVN) -- it is a considerably better than CVS. As a matter of fact, it was designed to overcome some of the limitations of CVS. SVN and CVS

[twsocket] Using SourceForge for ICS ?

Hello Guys ! I'm considering the option of pushing ICS to SourceForge and I would like to have your opinion. Does someone already have a real experience of SourceForge as a developper ? The first decision is should I select CVS or SVN ? Any advice appreciated. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The author of

Re: [twsocket] Bug in OverbyteICSHttpProt.pas

Try with the change below. I checked with the URL you gave and it works (Tested with Delphi only), with or without NO_USE_OF_ADVANCED_HTTP_CLIENT_FEATURES defined. {$IFDEF UseContentCoding} // FContentCodingHnd.WriteBuffer(P, K); FContentCodingHnd.WriteBuffer

Re: [twsocket] Bug in OverbyteICSHttpProt.pas

I have pinpointed the problem to GetBodyNextLine: if FChunkState = httpChunkGetData then begin K := FChunkLength - FChunkRcvd; if K > N then K := N; if K > 0 then begin N := N - K;

Re: [twsocket] Bug in OverbyteICSHttpProt.pas

I just found out that I had displayheadercheckbox enabled and when the page could not be loaded due to bug in component code (chunked encoding), the header count is 0 so there a loop gets AV: if DisplayHeaderCheckBox.Checked then for I := 0 to HttpCli1.RcvdHeader.Count - 1 do /

Re: [twsocket] Bug in OverbyteICSHttpProt.pas

There must be a bug in my code as well as Francois' code when NO_USE_OF_ADVANCED_HTTP_CLIENT_FEATURES is defined and when HTTPtst demo is compiled with this component version, the below chunked encoding page raises an access violation: http://www.zaman.com.tr/webapp-tr/anasayfa.do Since I do not

Re: [twsocket] Bug in OverbyteICSHttpProt.pas

Hello All, I fixed the problem: http://www.fastream.com/ics/OverbyteIcsHttpProt.pas . Francois, please compare/check this and then include into the package. Regards, SZ On 10/1/07, Fastream Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Francois, I think we have a co