Re: [twsocket] How does standby/hibernate affectsockets/ICScomponents?

Fastream Technologies wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "ICS support mailing" > Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 10:11 AM > Subject: Re: [twsocket] How does standby/hibernate affect > sockets/ICScomponents? > > >> Fastream Technologies wrote: >>>

Re: [twsocket] How does standby/hibernate affect sockets/ICScomponents?

- Original Message - From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] How does standby/hibernate affect sockets/ICScomponents? > Fastream Technologies wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Yes, the question is whether the

Re: [twsocket] How does standby/hibernate affect sockets/ICS components?

Fastream Technologies wrote: > Hello, > > Yes, the question is whether they would have any effect on state > machines.. For example, let's say a socket is connected. For example > a THttpConnection. What would happen if windows is standby'd? I can't tell you exactly what will happen, but I would

[twsocket] How does standby/hibernate affect sockets/ICS components?

Hello, Yes, the question is whether they would have any effect on state machines.. For example, let's say a socket is connected. For example a THttpConnection. What would happen if windows is standby'd? Regards, SZ -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please g

Re: [twsocket] Questions about FTPClient

Dan wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:twsocket- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno Garrels >> Sent: 31 March 2007 13:57 >> To: ICS support mailing >> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Questions about FTPClient >> >> Dan wrote: -Original Message- Fr

[twsocket] another architectural question

Hello, I've some application which sits between two networks. It get's queries to be carried out (not DB queries) from a PC and gets the replies from the other network. The replies are stored in a queue and shall be reported back to that PC originally asking (this is always the same PC). For c

Re: [twsocket] Questions about FTPClient

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Arno Garrels > Sent: 31 March 2007 13:57 > To: ICS support mailing > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Questions about FTPClient > > Dan wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mail

Re: [twsocket] Questions about FTPClient

Dan wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:twsocket- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno Garrels >> Sent: 31 March 2007 12:24 >> To: ICS support mailing >> Subject: Re: [twsocket] Questions about FTPClient >> >> Dan wrote: So obviously those keepalive packe

Re: [twsocket] Questions about FTPClient

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Arno Garrels > Sent: 31 March 2007 12:24 > To: ICS support mailing > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Questions about FTPClient > > Dan wrote: > >> So obviously those keepalive packets do not reset the timeout

Re: [twsocket] Questions about FTPClient

Dan wrote: >> So obviously those keepalive packets do not reset the timeout (where >> ever it happens) however sending some bytes may help, see above. >> > > Try sending the NOOP command periodically whilst > downloading/uploading. Most servers should support this. > Not sure > how the component

Re: [twsocket] Questions about FTPClient

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Arno Garrels > Sent: 30 March 2007 19:58 > To: ICS support mailing > Subject: Re: [twsocket] Questions about FTPClient > > Arnau Font wrote: > >> > >> Also, I'm having trouble with slow transmissions. W