- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] FReadCount and overflows
> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> We do reset ReadCount while sending the objects to pool becaus
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We do reset ReadCount while sending the objects to pool because
> otherwise sometimes garbage is served. I know that this is a
> workaround not a fix.
Sure, otherwise you add bytes transfered in previous sessions to
the next client. What do you think is
Hello,
We do reset ReadCount while sending the objects to pool because otherwise
sometimes garbage is served. I know that this is a workaround not a fix.
Best Regards,
SZ
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Friday, February 23
Markus,
In latest versions, if you use D6 or better STREAM64 is defined
by default. Unless you transfered data volumes beyond 2^63-1 bytes
there won't be a problem ;-) Property ReadCount is reset to zero
before each transfer, so that has nothing to do with 7x24 apps.
---
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
ht
Hello,
while searching a serious problem in one of my apps I decided to run the
affected part from the IDE. It contains two TCP Servers built with
TWSocket (ICS V5.20, D2006).
As I checked it this morning the debugger told me there is some integer
overflow and when I looked at the line causing
Same test in the LAN, same result. Sometimes V6
was a little bit faster, sometimes V5. Overall it looks
like V6 was a little bit faster though. But that's just
my personal feeling ;-) I used the original Webserv demos
from ICS distributions.
---
Arno Garrels [TeamICS]
http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ov
Performance of V6 should not be noticabely different than V5.
Some operations are faster (Less hidden window creation), other are a little
bit slower (dynamic message dispatching). If you have a very fast network
and a slow processor, the difference may become significant.
If you have a profiler
Bjørnar Nielsen wrote:
> I'm using the latest ICS V6 and testing the THttpSrv-component.
>
> I'm doing the test on an old machine to see performance. It seems
> that the
> V6 is slower than V5. By that I mean that I get a faster transfer-
> rate from
> the server to a client (the same client on
Hello Bjornar,
We use multi-threaded v6 with NOFORMS;USE_SSL;NO_DEBUG_LOG;SECURITY_WIN32 in
defines and it shows ~15% faster performance. Then we do
THttpConnection-descendent object and thread pooling and get 3500
connections/sec on Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz 2GB DDR2. Apache makes a mere 2600
connect
I'm using the latest ICS V6 and testing the THttpSrv-component.
I'm doing the test on an old machine to see performance. It seems that the
V6 is slower than V5. By that I mean that I get a faster transfer-rate from
the server to a client (the same client on both test) with the V5 than with
the V6
> I need BCB5 code for DNS query with ICS. I should get two name servers by
BCB5 code.
> Do anybody have such code for BCB5?
Have a look at the cpp\internet folder. There is a sample provided with
ICS-V5: NsLook.
Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html
--
[EMAIL
Hi,
I need BCB5 code for DNS query with ICS. I should get two name servers by BCB5
code.
Do anybody have such code for BCB5?
Thanks in advance
Damir
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our web
12 matches
Mail list logo
