Re: [twsocket] ICS for Linux Development

2005-09-03 Thread Erich Kuba
Hi Ari, I need this too all be working within 2 months or so. I am going to start with some research into the messaging side first, and then will start with the design. I envisage using some of the code --- like the low level stuff, but to reconstruct the object set. I have no intention of maki

Re: [twsocket] NO_ADV_MT symbol

2005-09-03 Thread Dan
- Original Message - From: "Francois Piette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "ICS support mailing" Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 12:30 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] NO_ADV_MT symbol >> > IMO it is better design to have all access to a given >> > component from only one thread. And in that case,

Re: [twsocket] ICS for Linux Development

2005-09-03 Thread Francois PIETTE
> IIRC the reason for the awkwardness was the assumption that async > sockets don't exist in Linux (which is simply untrue AFAIK - or am I on > crack?) and/or the lack of a messaging system such as in Windows. IMO Linux lack both true async socket, and messaging system. Linux has non-blocking soc

Re: [twsocket] ICS for Linux Development

2005-09-03 Thread Ari Sundholm
Hello Eric, hello everyone! > locks up (threading). In speaking to Ari Sundholm about this, he mentioned > that the design of the TICSSocket components is a bit awkward and that this > sort of thing was bound to happen. I fully concur with what he has said, > and feel that a total rewrite of the