Re: [Twisted-Python] Twisted and Thread, thread not running when twisted app is running as service

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 4:46 PM Sereysethy TOUCH wrote: > I am on MacOS, it is a development phase, but deployment will be on Linux. > > It is hard to run dtrace/dtruss on MacOS due to the "system integrity > protection" on MacOS. I got some output but very limited information. > > So if there is

Re: [Twisted-Python] Twisted and Thread, thread not running when twisted app is running as service

On Thursday, 21 May 2020 21:45:44 BST Sereysethy TOUCH wrote: > I am on MacOS, it is a development phase, but deployment will be on Linux. > > It is hard to run dtrace/dtruss on MacOS due to the "system integrity > protection" on MacOS. I got some output but very limited information. > > So if th

Re: [Twisted-Python] Twisted and Thread, thread not running when twisted app is running as service

Hi, After I tested it on Linux, everything works fine. So I think the problem is related to MacOS restriction. I already reported the problem to the maintainers, because the library is supposed to work on both Linux and MacOS. But this new thread is killing the twisted main reactor. By the way I

Re: [Twisted-Python] [RFC] Drop support for Python 3.5 sometime after May 2021?

> On May 19, 2020, at 1:52 AM, Richard van der Hoff wrote: > > On 16/05/2020 06:56, Glyph wrote: >> >> >>> On May 15, 2020, at 8:40 PM, Craig Rodrigues >> > wrote: >>> >>> Maybe it would be OK to do one more release of Twisted and announce that as >>> the last

Re: [Twisted-Python] [RFC] Drop support for Python 3.5 sometime after May 2021?

> On May 19, 2020, at 5:41 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone > wrote: > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:33 AM Barry Scott > wrote: > On Monday, 18 May 2020 22:21:16 BST Tom Most wrote: > > > > > If looking improve process management in Twisted, I think that the > > lowe

Re: [Twisted-Python] [RFC] Drop support for Python 3.5 sometime after May 2021?

> On May 19, 2020, at 11:14 AM, Tom Most wrote: > > On Tue, May 19, 2020, at 5:41 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote: >> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:33 AM Barry Scott > > wrote: >> Why not waitpid for all children (pid=0 or pid=-1) in a single call? >> >> Because t