Re: [Twisted-Python] Test coverage requirements

On 26 February 2017 at 23:51, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking at some recent trunk commits (also, others) that seem to have > non-trivial untested code at at ReviewProcess. I can't tell if the codecov > reports are wrong or if the development process documentation is wrong or if

[Twisted-Python] trac spam

Tickets 9058 and 9059 are spam. I would have cleaned them up but it's not clear from the UI how (actually I clicked a "delete" button in the UI but the tickets are there so I guess "delete" doesn't mean what I think). Jean-Paul ___ Twisted-Python mailin

Re: [Twisted-Python] trac spam

On 27 February 2017 at 12:59, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote: > Tickets 9058 and 9059 are spam. I would have cleaned them up but it's not > clear from the UI how (actually I clicked a "delete" button in the UI but > the tickets are there so I guess "delete" doesn't mean what I think). I have removed

Re: [Twisted-Python] trac spam

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Adi Roiban wrote: > On 27 February 2017 at 12:59, Jean-Paul Calderone > wrote: > > Tickets 9058 and 9059 are spam. I would have cleaned them up but it's > not > > clear from the UI how (actually I clicked a "delete" button in the UI but > > the tickets are there

Re: [Twisted-Python] catching twisted pyqt segmentation fault

In general, detecting segfaults in arbitrary processes on the system probably isn't possible. Specifically, I looked up the docs for you ;). Attach a handler to the QWebEngineView::renderProcessTerminated signal :). https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qwebengineview.html#renderProcessTerminated

Re: [Twisted-Python] Test coverage requirements

> On Feb 26, 2017, at 3:51 PM, Jean-Paul Calderone > wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking at some recent > trunk > commits >

Re: [Twisted-Python] trac spam

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 5:49 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone > wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Adi Roiban > wrote: > On 27 February 2017 at 12:59, Jean-Paul Calderone > mailto:exar...@twistedmatrix.com>> wrote: > > Tickets 9058 and 9059 are spam. I would have cleaned

Re: [Twisted-Python] Test coverage requirements

On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 at 21:54 Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: > That said, it has been *improving* and if it keeps improving at the rate > it has been, I expect that we'd be able to put that coverage blocker back > in in another 3-4 months. Perhaps something to talk about at PyCon. > I think at least one

Re: [Twisted-Python] Test coverage requirements

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Tristan Seligmann wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 at 21:54 Glyph Lefkowitz > wrote: > >> That said, it has been *improving* and if it keeps improving at the rate >> it has been, I expect that we'd be able to put that coverage blocker back >> in in another 3-4 months

Re: [Twisted-Python] Removing support for old Python 3 versions

Yes, this is what my Raspbian system reports: Python 3.4.2 (default, Oct 19 2014, 13:31:11) [GCC 4.9.1] on linux ---Tom On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2017, at 3:29 PM, Tom Most wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz > wrote: > >>

Re: [Twisted-Python] Python3 twistd daemon for Ubuntu 14.04 alternatives

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote: > > Are you talking about building Docker containers on the fly? > > > I’m a bit baffled what gave you that idea after I’ve spent days arguing > for strict build/runtime separation? > I was just trying to figure out where you were having th

Re: [Twisted-Python] Test coverage requirements

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 3:33 PM, Jean-Paul Calderone > wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Tristan Seligmann > wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2017 at 21:54 Glyph Lefkowitz > wrote: > That said, it has been improving and if it keep

Re: [Twisted-Python] Removing support for old Python 3 versions

Perhaps we should add a Raspbian builder if this is a platform of interest to Twisted users. (And I do think it should be.) Are there big / fast raspberry pi emulators so we don't need to wait for the test suite to run on such a slow / small machine? > On Feb 27, 2017, at 3:38 PM, Tom Most wr

Re: [Twisted-Python] Python3 twistd daemon for Ubuntu 14.04 alternatives

Hi Clayton, On February 27, 2017 at 6:07:14 PM, Clayton Daley (clayton.da...@gmail.com) wrote: [SNIP] Obviously Glyph couldn't answer this question so his interjection came off as condescendingly unhelpful.  Perhaps it's not an impression he deserves, but he got off to a horrible start when

Re: [Twisted-Python] Python3 twistd daemon for Ubuntu 14.04 alternatives

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Clayton Daley wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:08 AM, Hynek Schlawack > wrote: > >> Are you talking about building Docker containers on the fly? > > I’m a bit baffled what gave you that idea after I’ve spent days arguing for > strict buil