On 12/02/2017 01:44, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
Yeah, this is a lack of test coverage for the 'default' case.
Technically it /is/ a regression, but it's probably pretty unusual to
use the default; point being, I don't think we need an emergency release
here.
Agreed. It's completely tolerable.
N
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 03:45 Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
>
> Yeah, this is a lack of test coverage for the 'default' case. Technically
> it *is* a regression, but it's probably pretty unusual to use the
> default; point being, I don't think we need an emergency release here.
>
The functionality that
Hello,
Since trial has stopped adding the working directory to sys.path, it seems
very sensible to also stop accepting paths as a way to specify what tests
to run. Instead, only package, module, class, or test method names should
be accepted.
Please add your thoughts (reasoned arguments, not +1s
Thanks Jean-Paul, that indeed did help! To restate what you said, we're
now allowing both authenticated and unauthenticated (anonymous)
connections, each returning a different type of Avatar. We then take a
look at what the connection is trying to do (handle outbound email vs.
handle inbound emai
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2017, at 6:59 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for highlighting those. I've put the link in the other direction
>> as well.
>>
>>
> Craig seems eager
