Am Freitag, 10. Juni 2016, 12:39:20 CEST schrieb Craig Rodrigues:
> I hope you haven't lost interest in this, and are still willing to push
> forward.
Maybe in autumn. But I rather hope somebody else would continue with this.
--
Wolfgang
___
Twisted-Py
Hi all,
Since we're starting to get PRs from random people it's worth trying to
make the process as friendly as possible.
So, maybe instead of telling new contribtutors "PRs won't be reviewed
without an issue, see contributor guidelines" it would be better to say
"Thanks for the PR! I opened
Hi,
I support this approach.
I have a few small suggestions.
(1) Give the exact link of some reasonable text that you want people to
read. The contributor guidelines are accurate,
but the text is verbose. It takes a while to get to the text that
gives you the actual steps to follow.
On 12 June 2016 at 21:32, Itamar Turner-Trauring
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since we're starting to get PRs from random people it's worth trying to
> make the process as friendly as possible.
>
> So, maybe instead of telling new contribtutors "PRs won't be reviewed
> without an issue, see contributor g
> On 13 Jun 2016, at 01:04, Wolfgang Rohdewald
> wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, 10. Juni 2016, 12:39:20 CEST schrieb Craig Rodrigues:
>> I hope you haven't lost interest in this, and are still willing to push
>> forward.
>
> Maybe in autumn. But I rather hope somebody else would continue with this.
>
> On Jun 12, 2016, at 13:32, Itamar Turner-Trauring wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Since we're starting to get PRs from random people it's worth trying to make
> the process as friendly as possible.
>
> So, maybe instead of telling new contribtutors "PRs won't be reviewed without
> an issue, see con
